EthanLewis

148 Decks, 1,477 Comments, 183 Reputation

well am I ever glad to hear that!
Thanks sure, I'm glad you like the deck, but I'm also really thankful for the compliment! (:

the only thing this deck will have a problem with is valakut. besides that, I think I'll stomp everything else. lol

0
Posted 05 August 2011 at 17:30 in reply to #188875 on Green white, get@me

Permalink

noxious revival. its green but it uses phyrexian mana. and it puts it on top of your library.

0
Posted 05 August 2011 at 07:52 in reply to #188793 on Go long Ill throw a grenade.

Permalink

F** around, get killed.

Lol I'm just joking, I'm not that hard-up...

0
Posted 05 August 2011 at 06:23 in reply to #188720 on Cicatri et facies est Deo

Permalink

hmmm... for some reason my advice in the area of white weenie seems to be lacking.. a lot o.o

not sure I exactly like the whole ally thing. i mean, it's great if you're committed, but i feel like you're missing out on some of the greatest weenies! :P

mother of runes
kitchen finks
mirran crusader
...the 4th stoneforge LOL (i love this hoe)
jotun grunt would be kinda cool.


and i also think aether vial would be lovelyyyy here. it goes in any weenie deck, lol.

plus, no stp or pte? where's your removal? :O

i dont really want to suggest replacement values.. because that'd essentially be changing the deck. but those are some cards id seriously consider.

p.s. HOLYCRAP, i wasnt following you til today? weird i swore i was.
now I am, so it's all cool, LOL

2
Posted 05 August 2011 at 06:20 as a comment on White weanie

Permalink

No problem (:

and i think cabal therapies could easily be replaced with hymm, no doubt. but i think 4 is a bit overkill. maybe put it back to 3 and bump up the pulse to 4. i think pulse is a great card, and will help you more times than hymm. 7 discard spells is plenty, lol.

on that note, I think fluster storms could easilyyy be replaced with daze. I LOVE daze. i mean it screws storm so bad. SO bad, people dont expect it, it's essentially "free", and it's an easy side-out in some matches.
for jace, I'd consider taking out the equipment. batterskull is great with stoneforge, but by itself is pretty weak in legacy. weak for its cost, not for what it does, lol. dont get me wrong. :P

if you took out the 2 equips you could easily fit 2 jace. maybe even drop a daze for the 3rd?

up to you, but i hope I helped once again :'D

0
Posted 05 August 2011 at 06:13 in reply to #188662 on BUG Aggtrol

Permalink

Yeah, THAT was the central focus of this deck. <.<

0
Posted 05 August 2011 at 03:39 in reply to #188720 on Cicatri et facies est Deo

Permalink

i commented on 1, but your newest deck was tribal.. and like I said, not my forte. sorry man, but i left a nice few paragraphs on your other one (:

0
Posted 05 August 2011 at 00:11 in reply to #188583 on RUG-Vine

Permalink

i like 8 fetches.. i guess it comes down to preferance, though. I just like being able to fix my mana base with ease. and for 1 life, I think it's worth it. (:

flusterstorm to me is iffy. iunno, i see why it's so good in certain matchups, but as a maindeck slot i'd rather a mana leak or counterspell. even daze, catch 'em off guard, you know?

also I'm not sure how i feel about cabal therapy. i think in this type of deck it's just blindly firing into your opponent's hand. i think hymm to tourach could be better, but maybe just because I HATE seeing hymm across the board -.-

also, why no jace? i think you could deal without the equipment, honestly. jace as a 3 of in this build would be marvelous. (: bounce whatever creature opposes you.

once again, just my 2 cents, being a legacy newb and all, but those are the changes I'd make. (:
hope I helped haha

1
Posted 05 August 2011 at 00:10 as a comment on BUG Aggtrol

Permalink

haha yeah man i'll take a look. tribal isn't my thing so ill skip your wizards deck, but your newest 2 i'd be happy to check (:

0
Posted 05 August 2011 at 00:02 in reply to #188583 on RUG-Vine

Permalink

Ahhhhh, i see, I see.
I saw jacob van lunen's mono blue control, and he had 4 maindeck stifle. so i wanted to know why they were so good as to deserve a 4 of maindeck slot.

0
Posted 04 August 2011 at 23:30 in reply to #188029 on Standstill Depths

Permalink

...other worse decks starting standing a chance, LOL.
stoneforge was my favorite card next o vengevine.. and they went together so well : [

0
Posted 04 August 2011 at 23:26 in reply to #188583 on RUG-Vine

Permalink

...I hate standard. when they took away jace and stoneforge, the format got so shitty. : [
sure, it's healthier, but the decks are also a lot worse. LOL

0
Posted 04 August 2011 at 22:19 in reply to #188583 on RUG-Vine

Permalink

haha no worries, (: inkmoth is great in a meta without mutavault or mishra's factory, lol.

0
Posted 04 August 2011 at 22:11 in reply to #188583 on RUG-Vine

Permalink

I wanted an inkmoth for just a chump blocker in the situation where I couldn't block/kill an equipped hawk or something. lol. easy chumper, you know?

and bloodghast is good, but vengevine shall forever hold my heart. <3

0
Posted 04 August 2011 at 22:05 in reply to #188583 on RUG-Vine

Permalink

i agree, surgery + b,o. is nuts, but i mean, tarmogoyf by himself in such a limited format will win games.
id rather have a playset of tarmogoyf than a 2 card interaction that screws your landbase :/

0
Posted 04 August 2011 at 07:06 in reply to #188304 on Cicatri et facies est Deo

Permalink

...nuff said. LOL

0
Posted 04 August 2011 at 07:05 in reply to #188029 on Standstill Depths

Permalink

...that's actually a swell combo. sdt + bob.
it's my friends deck, so ill be sure to highly advise him to do so!

thanks again (:

but could you explain why stifle is so good in legacy? might seem like a weird question, but i dont see why it's so popular.

0
Posted 04 August 2011 at 06:19 in reply to #188029 on Standstill Depths

Permalink

4 colors? I think that's really ballsdeep, man. a bit too ballsdeep. if anything I'd ditch blue. yeah fatespinner is AMAZING, but tarmogoyf is so easily splashable, as is hide/seek for the fact it only requires 1 white mana. fatespinner takes 2 blue, and with the mess of black mana you need to hit the double black costs of this deck, I wouldn't risk it.

how many lands are you thinking on running?
i like luminarch... a lot, and I loveee bitterblossom. but i think fatespinner and counter balance can go... so can blue all together, really.

0
Posted 04 August 2011 at 02:53 as a comment on Cicatri et facies est Deo

Permalink

thats suicide.... o.o
iunno, we'll think of something. and yeah ill take a look (:

0
Posted 04 August 2011 at 02:49 in reply to #188242 on Standstill Depths

Permalink

Thanks man, and we actually considered hex, but it seemed so weak in the scheme of things, and a wasted slot.
(i say we because this is my friend's deck that i'm helping him design).
also, we were thinking about including tombstalker, like ragged suggested. but in that case bob really sucks. any suggestions? haha

0
Posted 04 August 2011 at 01:09 in reply to #188242 on Standstill Depths

Permalink

421-440 of 1,458 items