dknight27

1,840 Decks, 2,576 Comments, 300 Reputation

i just posted the version of dstorm that closely resembles yours, its called ancient future, check it out

0
Posted 17 March 2010 at 00:20 as a comment on Storming Dragons

Permalink

old concept, new shot

0
Posted 17 March 2010 at 00:19 as a comment on ancient future

Permalink

whoops, and Kokusho, the Evening Star

0
Posted 16 March 2010 at 23:48 as a comment on Dragon Storm

Permalink

this is a rather strange dragonstorm deck. you have deviated from the traditional idea, which isnt necessarily bad, but i think this deck has a little room from improvement. I would take out taurean mauler, gigadrowse, remand, banefire, slight of hand, and manamorphose

and add in :
Boseiju, Who Shelters All,
intuition
Grozoth
pact of negation
mana vault (if you can get em)
brainstorm

that gives you more speed and precision for the win

0
Posted 16 March 2010 at 23:47 as a comment on Dragon Storm

Permalink

whats up my man, i love me a dragonstorm deck. i have 3 of my own. personally i would re-make this deck a lil bit. you dont need 12 dragons because the maximum you need to win is 4. i would drop it down to 8 or 9. 4 hellkites, 4 kokushos, and maybe 1 hunted aught to do the trick. that is enough dragons to win and will free up some card spots for you. i would also consider making this a black and red or blue and red deck. with black you can add dark ritual and some fantastic search cards. With blue you can add some search and counter.

here are some cards to look at that could help you.

BLACK:
demonic tutor, dark ritual, diabolic tutor, vampiric tutor, duress

BLUE:
grozoth, intuition, pact of negation, brainstorm

COLORLESS:
mana vault, mana crypt, Boseiju, Who Shelters All


these changes will speed the deck up quite a bit and will provide some protection, both of which will lead to more wins.

check out my main dragonstorm deck, its the first deck i posted

0
Posted 16 March 2010 at 14:00 as a comment on Storming Dragons

Permalink

duress is to get rid of any counters they r holding

0
Posted 16 March 2010 at 13:34 as a comment on rose war

Permalink

i prefer the double win

0
Posted 15 March 2010 at 22:55 as a comment on rose war

Permalink

i found it, the rule is as follows:

101.1. Whenever a card's text directly contradicts these rules, the card takes precedence. The card overrides only the rule that applies to that specific situation. The only exception is that a player can concede the game at any time (see rule 104.3a).

0
Posted 15 March 2010 at 21:54 as a comment on literal omnipotence

Permalink

hey my man, would you mind sending me a link so i can look at the rule that says the card is the ultimate authority, that you posted on my deck

0
Posted 15 March 2010 at 20:12 as a comment on Mono blue mill (comment)

Permalink

gotterdammerung, would you mind posting a link for me of the official rules, i need to be absolutely sure before i try this

0
Posted 15 March 2010 at 19:53 as a comment on literal omnipotence

Permalink

thats my boy, im goin for it

0
Posted 15 March 2010 at 18:27 as a comment on literal omnipotence

Permalink

hey my man, ive been gone a while, how have you been

0
Posted 15 March 2010 at 16:52 as a comment on Infinita Saproling Combo

Permalink

i would actually make the argument that due to space-times implicit nature, you could do this at a sanctioned standard event and the officials would be powerless to stop you

0
Posted 15 March 2010 at 16:31 as a comment on literal omnipotence

Permalink

oh, i forgot to mention that once you pull off the combo you can simply say: this combination is now a legal combo in the game of magic, and it was before the match started. That fixes the problem

0
Posted 15 March 2010 at 16:28 as a comment on literal omnipotence

Permalink

boom

0
Posted 15 March 2010 at 16:21 as a comment on literal omnipotence

Permalink

hipp, your a machine, ive been gone a while and i come back and youv almost caught me

0
Posted 12 March 2010 at 20:25 as a comment on bloodchief mill

Permalink

it probably is, but im not concerned with that

0
Posted 12 March 2010 at 20:18 as a comment on might or majesty

Permalink

ive been gone a while, its good to be back

0
Posted 19 January 2010 at 21:13 as a comment on minutes till midnight

Permalink

ya im pretty sure it works

0
Posted 31 December 2009 at 22:56 as a comment on maker's mistakes

Permalink

Yah. Me too, my man.

0
Posted 31 December 2009 at 22:55 as a comment on the omega

Permalink

1,661-1,680 of 2,573 items