DedWards

1,288 Decks, 4,874 Comments, 1,241 Reputation

I like the idea. But Forbidden Orchard should be replaced with something like City of Brass as the Orchid will end up supplying the opponent with a small army. Also you mite want to look into mass removal like Wrath of God so as to keep the opponent's board from getting too populated.

0
Posted 09 October 2011 at 07:23 as a comment on Kokusho the Druid

Permalink

I like the idea, but I have a few problems. 1) Obstinate Baloth can only be put into play for free if an opponent makes you discard it. 2) You have ALOT of discard to force the madness, but you don't have any draw to replenish your hand.

0
Posted 07 October 2011 at 06:22 as a comment on Madness

Permalink

Unusual is what I do :p

0
Posted 06 October 2011 at 21:38 in reply to #204178 on Strong hold on Discipline

Permalink

Interesting Tribal :)

I'm not sure why you're running 4 Konda's Banner, it's Legendary.

Also not sure why you're running Azorius Chancery, there's (arguably) better dual lands you could use (like Mystic Gate)

0
Posted 06 October 2011 at 21:35 as a comment on GRIFFFIN-DOR!

Permalink

I'm a little concerned about Myr Superion. I know Heartless Summoning essentially makes it 'free', but the Superion's 'only mana from creatures' ability worries me. Will the rules allow for him to be cast for 'free'?

0
Posted 05 October 2011 at 06:34 as a comment on IImpia Sordibus

Permalink

"thus the lazy land base" ? This deck actually looks 'simple yet effective', so the land base doesn't look too bad too me :p

0
Posted 05 October 2011 at 05:55 as a comment on IImpia Sordibus

Permalink

Trepanation Blade could add to the power of the Mindshrieker

0
Posted 03 October 2011 at 18:08 as a comment on Faceslapper.

Permalink

Glad to be of some form of help :)
23 lands (IMO) should be enough lands. I run 20 in almost all my decks (17 in my Goblin deck) and I've not had any problems with land. But that could just be me :p

Thanks for reminding me, I need to reconstruct one of my decks for tonight (we're playing Standard tonight).

It's still strange to see my sister's name on this site o_o

0
Posted 30 September 2011 at 14:09 in reply to #203618 on Tap That Ass (updated, 9/30 T2 legal)

Permalink

I like this, makes me want to design (yet another) Land Destruction deck :p

0
Posted 30 September 2011 at 12:03 as a comment on Innistrad Land Destruction - Suggestions?

Permalink

Definitely Ponder over Think Twice. The mana cost is what sways me first, then the rearranging of the library. Control (IMO any WU deck is control) shouldn't only control the opponent, but itself too and Ponder does exactly that. I'm more of an agro player, so I can only make decisions on WU from what I've faced against and I've always been more worried about the draw off a Ponder (and Preordain, but that's out) over strait draw.

0
Posted 30 September 2011 at 10:58 as a comment on Tap That Ass (updated, 9/30 T2 legal)

Permalink

Pallid Mycoderm has a nice ability: "Sacrifice a Saproling: Fungus and/or Saproling creatures you control get +1/+1 until end of turn."

So you sac all the blocked saps so that the others get bigger :p

0
Posted 30 September 2011 at 10:31 as a comment on Saproling horde

Permalink

Thanks. I love to make 'weird' decks and I especially enjoy it when I actually win with them :p

0
Posted 30 September 2011 at 07:23 in reply to #202917 on Strong hold on Discipline

Permalink

*sigh* The search lands reduce the number of lands in the deck during gameplay, thus reducing the number of unwanted land draws and increasing the chance of drawing more needed things (creatures, spells).

0
Posted 29 September 2011 at 05:12 in reply to #203064 on Short People

Permalink

I haven't had many problems with mine. I average a turn 3 / 4 Kokusho Nuke and I'm happy with that :p

0
Posted 28 September 2011 at 18:28 in reply to #202788 on Dragonstorm T1

Permalink

I like this. WB is my second favorite enemy colour to play (BG being my favorite). Personally I'd use Path to Exile over Swords to Plowshares in this type of deck as I wouldn't want to give the opponent life (I don't mind the extra land).

0
Posted 27 September 2011 at 19:18 as a comment on B/W Lifegain

Permalink

I'm not sure why almost everyone uses blue in their Dragonstorm decks... I lie, I know why, I just don't like it (personally) and that's why I made a strait red Dragonstorm deck ( http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=32108 ). Though in my build uses Rite of Flame and if memory serves, it's banned in Modern.

0
Posted 27 September 2011 at 19:06 as a comment on Dragonstorm T1

Permalink

If I ever do rebuild this (and I probably won't) I'd use things like the Annex, Ghostly Prison and Propaganda.

0
Posted 27 September 2011 at 09:15 in reply to #202224 on Strong hold on Discipline

Permalink

Ha ha ha, that's an awesome card :) I probably won't use it, 1- I don't have access to it, 2- I'm trying to keep this Modern legal :p

0
Posted 27 September 2011 at 09:05 in reply to #202242 on Strong hold on Discipline

Permalink

Unfortunately that wouldn't work as the creature doesn't leave play to re-enter and trigger the seeker / priest again. I actually had red in an earlier version, but found it slowed me down.

0
Posted 27 September 2011 at 08:53 in reply to #202307 on Strong hold on Discipline

Permalink

It'd be A LOT counter productive as I need the opponent to keep the creatures I feed him.

0
Posted 27 September 2011 at 08:45 in reply to #202395 on Strong hold on Discipline

Permalink

3,661-3,680 of 4,870 items