DedWards

1,288 Decks, 4,874 Comments, 1,241 Reputation

I got Savage to netdeck my deck? O.o

Thanks for the praise :D

I've actually spent a good few years building and rebuilding this deck. I find that adding a 3rd colour spoils the synergy of the deck.

0
Posted 14 October 2011 at 22:34 in reply to #206939 on Strong hold on Discipline

Permalink

You may find it silly, I find it a challenge :p

1
Posted 14 October 2011 at 22:29 in reply to #206990 on GW Knights

Permalink

I'm trying to make something similar, but I'm wanting to use the Lawkeeper to set up creatures for Royal Assassin.

0
Posted 13 October 2011 at 22:08 as a comment on Aggroll

Permalink

A friend runs Worldslayers in his mono green spider deck. He stalls until he gets both Worldslayer and Darksteel Plate on a creature, then removes as many blockers as posible and swings :)

Another thing you could do is equip Invisible Stalker with Worldslayer and Darksteel Plate :p

I've seen a game where Oblivion Rings where used to keep some of the permanents after Worldslayer triggered.

0
Posted 13 October 2011 at 06:50 as a comment on The Worldslayer ( Comments?)

Permalink

There's a small problem with that, I live in South Africa and at the current exchange rate $10 = R80 (about) and that's if I get someone to go halvies with me. It also excludes the postage and import costs :(

0
Posted 13 October 2011 at 06:26 in reply to #206273 on GW Creatures (Edit of my GW Knights)

Permalink

You need search for Liquimetal Coating, unfortunately there is none in standard (as far as I know)

0
Posted 12 October 2011 at 08:30 as a comment on NO LANDS FOR YOU!

Permalink

A guy in my group is using a similar deck to get his brother back into playing, but he has a set of Hero of Bladehold in his. Good [enter deity here] is the deck fast. My fastest pre rotation deck (my gobbies) was too slow to keep up :(

0
Posted 12 October 2011 at 08:10 as a comment on Balls of Steel

Permalink

You could always use land search to reduce the number of lands in your library, or a more destructive way would be to target yourself with a kicked Sadistic Sacrement.

0
Posted 12 October 2011 at 06:35 as a comment on Memory Loop

Permalink

I don't see why people play Remand
. It just delays, a strait counter would be better.

0
Posted 12 October 2011 at 06:27 as a comment on Merfolks

Permalink

Blazing Archon and Iona mainboard is imo a better option, but then again my group plays a lot of agro and / or creature heavy decks.

1
Posted 11 October 2011 at 15:15 as a comment on Legacy Reanimator

Permalink

Livewire Lash on an infect creature + pump spells = lots of fun (for you) :p

0
Posted 11 October 2011 at 15:06 as a comment on green infect test No. 1

Permalink

I didn't say she doesn't play them, I'm just saying that if they get removed or (for some odd reason) they don't get drawn, the deck is allot slower.

If I had vials, I'd use them in my elf decks.

0
Posted 11 October 2011 at 13:33 in reply to #206126 on Legacy Merfolk

Permalink

Everybody uses Stasis to form a total lockdown. Am I the only one that uses Mist of Stagnation? With Mist of Stagnation, you can untap while preventing the opponent from doing so with cards like Planar Void and make them enter the battlefield tapped with cards like Orb of Dreams. I actually do this in my deck Mist of Stagnation ( http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=93804 ) :p

As for your deck, I like the Falcons, vigilance is sometimes underrated :)

0
Posted 11 October 2011 at 12:06 as a comment on Keep your stuff tapped =)

Permalink

A lady in our group plays a very similar deck. I was very happy when I saw Mental Misstep getting banned (she ran them in her sb). This is a strong deck, but one of the weaknesses I find are the Æther Vials - if they don't feature, the deck is allot slower.

0
Posted 11 October 2011 at 08:41 as a comment on Legacy Merfolk

Permalink

The Exemplar I can understand, but the point of the deck was for the knights to be multicoloured.

0
Posted 10 October 2011 at 18:32 in reply to #205910 on GW Knights

Permalink

Just had an idea for the "DOR" part of the deck name - add some Door of Destinies. You name griffin and it'll be a "Griffin Door" :p

1
Posted 10 October 2011 at 17:34 as a comment on GRIFFFIN-DOR!

Permalink

I understand your concern, but this was just a rough idea that I wanted to link to a friend for his input (he's not a member on the Vault). As for the tapping, most creatures tap to attack, so I don't need to force tappaing too often :p If I ever make this (and I probably won't, the cards I'm missing cost way too much) I'll adjust the mana according to how playtesting goes.

0
Posted 10 October 2011 at 17:27 in reply to #205914 on Ded's Humans (BW version)

Permalink

I like the idea and would hate to face it. Mite I suggest adding the enchantment 'Lure'. Lure on the obliterator is just nasty to face off. You mite also want to add an alternative win condition, just in case.

0
Posted 09 October 2011 at 07:41 as a comment on Hunting with Nukes

Permalink

I have to ask, how the hell is pump (giant growth) greater than mana ramp (rampant growth) ??

You say the obliterator doesn't have value, have you ever gone against one? The removal exists, but that doesn't make the obliterator less valuable. Your argument makes all creatures not have a value.

This deck (as far as I can tell) is supposed to be standard and it looks like a good start to me.

0
Posted 09 October 2011 at 07:39 in reply to #205606 on Hunting with Nukes

Permalink

You got a point about the mana, but I think he's trying to make a standard deck and the cards you suggested aren't. I have to disagree about Titanic growth, yes it's a bigger pump, but Mutegenic can be cast for "free" and imo, that makes it a lot better.

0
Posted 09 October 2011 at 07:32 in reply to #205605 on Hunting with Nukes

Permalink

3,641-3,660 of 4,870 items