NightmareVampire

26 Decks, 126 Comments, 0 Reputation

Don't have any fetches. Ad. Angel is actually to swing with, her landfall trigger is a bonus. I am running a lot of lands in this deck, so I never have a problem with landfall for her anyway.

0
Posted 29 March 2010 at 07:16 in reply to #59048 on UW Control/Jacerator Hybrid

Permalink

Only have 1 atm

0
Posted 29 March 2010 at 07:15 in reply to #59044 on UW Control/Jacerator Hybrid

Permalink

Also, your main deck is T2, while your sideboard is not. I would suggest picking a format and going with it.

0
Posted 22 March 2010 at 06:59 in reply to #57996 on Vampire kingdom

Permalink

This deck will show nothing, because you are only running 16 swamps with no fetches. 22 lands is the realistic minimum if you are running only basic lands.

0
Posted 22 March 2010 at 06:55 as a comment on Vampire kingdom

Permalink

That's basically what the side board is for. I might move some creature removal to MB...

0
Posted 19 March 2010 at 07:51 in reply to #57059 on Disruption

Permalink

Don't have comet storm. I will look at searing blaze.

0
Posted 09 March 2010 at 21:01 in reply to #55854 on Chandra Wins

Permalink

Yeah Font of Mythos and Howling Mine and Pyromancer normally go together well. I don't have those cards though :o(

0
Posted 09 March 2010 at 21:00 in reply to #55817 on Chandra Wins

Permalink

Lots of decks are running it. Go check MTG Salvation

0
Posted 09 March 2010 at 21:00 in reply to #55813 on Chandra Wins

Permalink

Woa. Interesting build. I am pretty much only good with T2 builds, so I don't have much to add except for this - maybe Nissa Rivane and Nissa's Chosen would work in here somewhere?

0
Posted 09 March 2010 at 11:53 as a comment on Elvish Urge

Permalink

The only thing I might suggest is trading Calcite Snapper with Sphinx of Jwar Isle if you can, as Sphinx is A) Flying and B) Works better as an attacker if you need him.

Aside from that, I like your build quite a bit.

0
Posted 13 February 2010 at 17:02 as a comment on UW Control

Permalink

Lunden - LOVE the Quenchable Fire idea. I am going to get on that ASAP.

DJGates - I thought about swerves, etc. But ultimately decided against it because I wanted to be more "burn oriented".

Thanks for the input! Keep it coming!!!

0
Posted 13 February 2010 at 17:01 as a comment on ***Please Comment!*** Control/Burn

Permalink

I would but I don't have the card. Plus I am trying to keep the deck as cheap as I can

0
Posted 09 February 2010 at 14:31 as a comment on White Soldier/Kor/Knight

Permalink

-4 Guul Draz

+1 Gatekeeper of Malakir
+3 Quag Vampires

0
Posted 09 February 2010 at 13:50 as a comment on Vamp v.2

Permalink

-2 Pulse Tracker
-4 Lacerator
-4 Disfigure

+3 Malakir Bloodwitch
+3 Quag Vamps
+4 Urge to Feed

0
Posted 09 February 2010 at 13:48 as a comment on Vampire Aggro

Permalink

If this is for play in an FNM-style format, you will want to cut it to as close to 60 cards as you can get.

You have a lot of 1x "Creature Type". Aggro decks tend to work better with 3x or 4x of a chosen creature. Since this is a vamp deck I would stick with Vamps (wall of bone, giant scorpion, etc aren't vamps).

You need to "focus" the deck a bit more. Do a deck search for other vampire decks to get ideas (you can just type the term "vamp" in and then sort by posting date).

0
Posted 02 February 2010 at 08:17 as a comment on Vampires-monoblack

Permalink

Thank ya

0
Posted 01 February 2010 at 06:38 as a comment on Legacy Vampires -Comment Please-

Permalink

Edited to include some creatures and some other burn spells.

0
Posted 31 January 2010 at 17:57 as a comment on Magnifying Glass (control/burn)

Permalink

Not a problem. I just try to give opinions based on what I have seen by playing a Vamp deck myself. There were a lot of cards that I had in my first deck that I thought would work great, and worked well in casual games, but when I came up against some stronger decks in tourneys I found that they didn't work as well as I though. Blade of the Bloodcheif is a perfect example. I loved the idea of that card, and it worked well in casual games that lasted longer, but when I played tougher decks I found that it just really wasn't as effective as I first thought. It was a huge bummer :(

0
Posted 28 January 2010 at 15:34 as a comment on Vampire Deck

Permalink

Sure thing, man. I always try to be helpful and not "pushy".

0
Posted 28 January 2010 at 15:32 as a comment on Blood Bond (T2 Vampire Combo)

Permalink

If you are playing competitively you are going want to cut this closer to 60 cards.

Also, Piranha Marsh makes the deck run slower and Kalitas is WAY more expensive than he is worth, plus you really won't end up using his ability that much in a competitive game. I would suggest

-4 Piranha Marsh
-3 Kalitas

+4 Swamp
+3 Tendrils of Corruption

To get it to 60 cards...

-4 Terramorphic Expanse (you are running mono black, so fetchlands aren't as important)
-3 Consume Spirit (you can sideboard these, and adding Tendrils, less expensive version of Consume)
-3 Blade of the Bloodcheif (I run a vamp deck that used to have Blade and it was not nearly as effective as I hoped it would be)

Mind you, all of these comments are based on the possibility of you playing in a competitive formant (FNM, other tourneys). If this deck is for casual I think naviis is right, you are probably fine.

Check out my Vamp deck if you want more ideas:
Deck link: http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=41374

0
Posted 28 January 2010 at 12:33 as a comment on Vampire Deck

Permalink

1-20 of 125 items

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Last