Kazzong

except heartstabber does not have fllash, nor is it limited to non-black creatures.

@ fluffyweresheep.
But, the qualifications that you seem to have implied were that BY ITSELF cast through time is a bad mythic, and by themselves, the other cards I listed are worse. But my question was why do you feel that Cast Through Time the worst mythic you have seen? Is it just because of the mana cost? Also, they did a fairly recent reprinting of negator, in a duel deck. Phyrexia vs the Coalition. It came as the Phyrexian mythic foil.

I see your logic on things here, but why is Cast Through Time the worst mythic, in your opinion? true it is expensive, but I am sure that I could find a worse mythic. etched monstrosity, phyrexian negator, abyssal persecutor, lotus cobra... ? Now, going on the assuption that by itself Cast through time is a bad card, then by that reasoning these cards are horrific to know they even exist. Particularly as "mythic rare" status cards.

Not trying to argue with you, just curious on your train of thought about Cast Through Time. although, like I said, I can see that you are trying to prove that even the worst mythics can be game changing cards. :) Which they are. For a while, I thought that Skaab Ruinator and Mirror-mad phantasm were Mythic crap status, but the deck type for which they truly shine hadn't been created yet.

That depends on what cards you run into.

I also have a myr deck, but it runs B/G not white. you chould check it out. :)

barrin's unmaking sucks pretty bad I hink.

Mana curve? Turn four-five you can have infinite Mana. However, the lands do landed fixed. Throw in some seat of the synods and some islands. Also, I would drop the mana leak for a hard counter, seeing as how mana is no issue. Maybe even some that would be less useful because of casting cost, but has a secondary ability of some kind. If not... Cancel or stoic rebuttal would be great. :)

Splintering wind should be here too.

Panters servant, and make everything white. Lands are not plains though, so they can't play any creatures.

Maybe, or maybe Bonfire of the Damned?

Hey man, chill out. I know the point and purpose if "decks" like this. And no, there is nothing wrong with debate, but I think that it should be on the forums, not here.

No moonmist? I think that it would be good in here.

What are you gonna do when new phyrexia goes out of standard?

the galvanizers untap each other, if you have more than one out, you don't need the voltaic construct. good deck though. The question is though... what are you going to do with the infinite mana that you can produce?

not a clue. I didn't like it, just commented. "decks" like this are stupid, seeing as how worlds "worst" cards are debatable, because almost any card can bemade good with the right deck. build a deck to suit it and it can be good.

oops, my bad. didn't read it correctly.

only if your opponent is playing 1 of 5 colors. but, yeah, it could definately be risky if they do play white. then it make you very ulnerable.

question... why whipeflare instead of pyroclasm? just to keep it standard?

sure, you could do that too. doing anything to give them a plains will work.

12? it is half of that... I am confused. Plus, you could cheat it out with show and tell, or something like it.