DedWards

1,288 Decks, 4,874 Comments, 1,241 Reputation

Or I could use the green leyline that gives +0/+1, it stands a chance of being played for free :p

0
Posted 08 April 2011 at 05:58 in reply to #151171 on Destroy All Lands

Permalink

Early defence is a problem, but this deck was designed for multiplayer where politics should keep me alive long enough to get the combo out :p

0
Posted 08 April 2011 at 05:50 in reply to #151086 on Destroy All Lands

Permalink

Thanks for the suggestions, I'll look into them

0
Posted 08 April 2011 at 05:46 in reply to #151081 on Destroy All Lands

Permalink

Lol, that'd be funny :p

0
Posted 07 April 2011 at 16:28 in reply to #150794 on Standard Land Destruction

Permalink

The best part about Liquimetal + artifact hate is that I can kill almost anything, but I'll try lower the number for some Ancient Stirrings :p

0
Posted 07 April 2011 at 16:25 in reply to #150268 on Standard Land Destruction

Permalink

They're both good cards and I'll use the Ancient Grudge (if I can get any).

0
Posted 07 April 2011 at 16:12 in reply to #150704 on Destroy All Lands

Permalink

One of the state based affects make it so that if a creature has -1/-1 counters and it gets +1/+1 counters then you remove equal amounts of each from the creature, so the persister will come back from the grave with a -1/-1 counter and Juniper will put a +1/+1 counter on it resulting in it losing both.

0
Posted 06 April 2011 at 08:38 in reply to #149891 on BIG sacrifice

Permalink

Normally I'm against that artifact, but it'll work very nicely in this deck, thanks for the suggestion.

0
Posted 05 April 2011 at 23:06 in reply to #150422 on Destroy All Lands

Permalink

But with Shatter I can target creatures if need be.

0
Posted 05 April 2011 at 23:05 in reply to #150169 on Destroy All Lands

Permalink

Glad to see I've got some fans :D I originally designed this to prove that land destruction can be done in standard, but now that I'm actually going to build it I'll be modifying it ALOT to get speed and consistancy (with the help of playtesting). Speed and consitancy are the biggest hurdles for most decks :p

0
Posted 05 April 2011 at 13:44 in reply to #150268 on Standard Land Destruction

Permalink

Like I said earlier, I wasn't planning on actually making this deck, but seeing as how popular it's gotten I'll put it together and try out some of the ideas I've been given here. Pyroclasm will be one of the 1st.

0
Posted 05 April 2011 at 13:38 in reply to #150229 on Standard Land Destruction

Permalink

From what I can see, the familiars make things cheaper and because of this, Priest of Gix and Recurring Nightmare make a mana loop that then gets pumped into Exsanguinate.

0
Posted 05 April 2011 at 05:52 in reply to #150183 on trying something odd...

Permalink

The cards you suggested aren't standard and that the challenge I set myself with this deck 'standard' land destruction.

0
Posted 05 April 2011 at 05:39 in reply to #150025 on Standard Land Destruction

Permalink

I see what you mean. I'll play around with a few ideas and see how they turn out.

0
Posted 04 April 2011 at 19:17 in reply to #149804 on Standard Land Destruction

Permalink

Valakut ramp can't do much without the Valakuts out and Liquimetal Coating + artifact hate should take care of most anything else Valakut ramp can use to hurt me (like the green titan) :p

0
Posted 04 April 2011 at 18:03 in reply to #149804 on Standard Land Destruction

Permalink

I'm going to actually try put this deck together and try out some of the things people suggested here, so I'll take a look at some other artifact mana and try get a balance that doesn't affect the speed of the deck.

0
Posted 04 April 2011 at 16:16 in reply to #149722 on Destroy All Lands

Permalink

I lol'd at the deck name :p

0
Posted 04 April 2011 at 05:56 as a comment on Rare Candy

Permalink

Thanks, I like it when people like my deck ideas :p

0
Posted 04 April 2011 at 05:47 in reply to #149679 on Standard Land Destruction

Permalink

I currently can't afford any so they don't make it into any of my deck designs.

0
Posted 04 April 2011 at 05:44 in reply to #149657 on Standard Land Destruction

Permalink

I already knew about it, but the challenge I put to myself in this deck was to make it standard.

0
Posted 04 April 2011 at 05:41 in reply to #149431 on Standard Land Destruction

Permalink

3,961-3,980 of 4,870 items