tomathan88

128 Decks, 238 Comments, 1 Reputation

also, just as a side note id switch out a plains for a mountain. =)

0
Posted 14 February 2011 at 22:59 in reply to #129294 on black gate

Permalink

hey man, remember me at all? took a break for a while but i'm back! found this new friend thing to be interesting. i'm now following you! if you want to follow me that'd be cool =) damn you got far while i was gone. almost to 400! im still at 114 =( i remember when you where there tho too. seemed like so much! haha.

anyways, on the deck, seems solid. it seems better know in the metagame with besieged and the new "fish" standard decks and boros. i always thought of making a deck like this for extended (as a r/w/u) to capture the power of wall of denial, and be able to to play counter-spells, but i never got 'round to it. you can make one if you want, just lmk if you do so i can check it out =P anyways good job keep it up!

0
Posted 14 February 2011 at 22:57 as a comment on black gate

Permalink

duh u are a konfused kat its edh

0
Posted 31 December 2010 at 01:16 as a comment on EDH Relentless Rats

Permalink

not unstopable. don't be cocky. people don't even play treefolk.

0
Posted 30 December 2010 at 23:24 as a comment on Treefolk (UNSTOPABLE)

Permalink

um aparently its extended.. what do u mean this can take out pretty much? maybe in a real sad casual...

0
Posted 29 December 2010 at 20:55 as a comment on Ally deck

Permalink

id suggest forked bolt over fire/ice. it's a good idea though.
sideboards are the most creative part of a deck, and shows whether you know what your doing or not. you should make one.

0
Posted 28 December 2010 at 18:13 as a comment on Help me Hurt you

Permalink

60 is better regardless. i can't see this winning any legacy tournament, but it sure is a lot of mana. into wolfbriar elemental. into wrath of god or firespout.

0
Posted 28 December 2010 at 18:10 as a comment on Manana Hammock

Permalink

i don't know what blake has to do with it...
but i do know kithkin isn't played in extended much any more..
and damn. people need to make sideboards. that's the most creative part of a deck.

0
Posted 28 December 2010 at 18:04 as a comment on Kithkin 4 Blake

Permalink

i would suggest underground sea; if this is a legacy deck, which it appears to be, there's no reason to play watery grave over it. also id take out urborg and tainted isle for an island and 4 polluted delta. you need at least one island if you end up playing a deck with a lot of wasteland cycle-throughs, or just wasteland in general. tainted isle isn't that great in general.

0
Posted 28 December 2010 at 18:02 as a comment on This Card B/U

Permalink

not really "insta-death" more like hope they don't have a doom blade or lightning bolt. i would suggest mind sculptor. might help.

0
Posted 28 December 2010 at 17:58 as a comment on R/G/U infect - turn 3 win

Permalink

aether vial isn't

0
Posted 20 December 2010 at 15:55 in reply to #106979 on Opposition (Legacy)

Permalink

i thot it was ok until i saw the sideboard. i thot it was standard. now it just looks terrible, no offence. looks fun, but thats about it.

0
Posted 18 December 2010 at 22:28 as a comment on Landfall of the godz

Permalink

and actually im too lazy but it is possible to make a goat deck. why dont u try it for 80th?

0
Posted 15 December 2010 at 16:21 as a comment on MOOOOOOOO!!!

Permalink

only 70? =P
no but really i have more. =)
and dknight27 has even more =0
i do like your ideas man keep it up.
although im surprised your decks get liked so fast. and suspicious. buts its all good.

0
Posted 15 December 2010 at 16:20 as a comment on MOOOOOOOO!!!

Permalink

i agree sorry bout being mean. the thing about the chasm though, is that it is an infinite combo. with zuran orb, you never take a thing, and without, you can always sac it instead of paying, then get it back with life from the loam. the non budget version uses alot more better cards tho. tabernacle, maze of ith, and most importantly the radishan port and wasteland. with those, you manaskrew them in the begining, then when they get stuff you chasm and maze of ith them. eventually u win unless they are combo or pull something off. either with man lands or damage lands are normally how u win (or worm harvest), this deck was cultivating valakut. it is also budget, so i didnt add the other crazy cards.

0
Posted 03 December 2010 at 20:03 in reply to #103005 on 100th Deck & 1 Year Anniversary

Permalink

you should see dknight27. over 300 decks by the hommie

0
Posted 03 December 2010 at 19:55 in reply to #103331 on 100th Deck & 1 Year Anniversary

Permalink

oh and the "enter the battlefield" applies to the third paragraph.

0
Posted 03 December 2010 at 18:33 in reply to #103572 on Please Read

Permalink

dont mind lifelink or deathtouch changes

kinda dislike trample change

and i always thought the "remove from game" shit was stupid. especially with pull from eternity, and cards like that if there are any. i mean, if it's out of the game, how the hell can u bring it into the game? that defeats the whole purpose. i think both "exile" and "cast" are more appropriate, and it kind of draws you away from the "its just a game" aspect. both "remove from game" and "play a spell" implies it is a game, and the other words bring u more into the magic world than just a game. whether that is a good thing or not, no idea. but i like it.

as for the attack damage stacking, i hate that rule change more than anything. this is what i have strongest feelings about, so u can count me in on this little survey/petition/thing.

0
Posted 03 December 2010 at 18:29 as a comment on Please Read

Permalink

ok. gamble gets the life from the loam. so does mulch (sort of). you can bring it back from the grave infinite times, so it works fine. crucible is good in this deck, and quite a few people play it, but i don't like it. if u try playing with the deck getting the mountains is not much of a problem, but ill raise it by one just for u. forests are very crucial to the deck, and i didn't want to lower my chances of getting one, but u could be right.

0
Posted 01 December 2010 at 17:46 in reply to #103005 on 100th Deck & 1 Year Anniversary

Permalink

uh... no... i can get fucken infinite by sacking it over and over again and bringing it back. you should look more at popular legacy decks dude. this is a famous deck, with, as i said, budget tweaking. sorry if i made u mad, but, cmon, dont just throw your "mine is better than yours" shit out there if u dont even noe the deck.

0
Posted 30 November 2010 at 23:27 in reply to #102918 on 100th Deck & 1 Year Anniversary

Permalink

21-40 of 234 items