Steve

13 Decks, 77 Comments, 26 Reputation

Only suggestion, perhaps another bloodghast. Running 4 will give you a better chance of getting it earlier on, which is nice with bloodghast. All in all the deck looks pretty fun, captivators are really annoying in casual games.

I'd also like to say, that nobody's trying to be a dick to you or boss you around. The reason people are saying the things they're saying is 'cause you posted it as a tournament quality deck, so people are gonna suggest what'd be best to change if you actually are trying to win at FNM or something (and yea, i saw that you clearly stated that this is NOT the decks purpose. Anyway, that's the reason certain people are responding the way they are...

0
Posted 10 March 2011 at 21:04 as a comment on Vampires (Done Properly)

Permalink

Hehe, i just looked at your profile, your grammar is about as awful as this deck.

1
Posted 10 March 2011 at 20:53 in reply to #139523 on UNBEATABLE DECK

Permalink

It's spelled creature.

0
Posted 10 March 2011 at 20:46 as a comment on Black/Red-Madness

Permalink

Banding is an old ability that lets creatures attack or block as a group. Look up some old cards with banding, it's kinda funny how ridiculously wrong the reminder text is for the ability.

0
Posted 10 March 2011 at 20:43 in reply to #140291 on UNBEATABLE DECK

Permalink

*Facepalm (again)

0
Posted 10 March 2011 at 20:42 in reply to #140310 on UNBEATABLE DECK

Permalink

To everyone who believed my deck is serious, i'm sorry your parents dropped you as a child.

2
Posted 10 March 2011 at 16:13 as a comment on UNBEATABLE DECK

Permalink

Lol, read some comments, Sorry you thought this is a serious deck.

0
Posted 10 March 2011 at 16:11 in reply to #140224 on UNBEATABLE DECK

Permalink

Pfft, mine is legal though, unlike cards involving the ante.

0
Posted 10 March 2011 at 11:23 in reply to #139712 on UNBEATABLE DECK

Permalink

Made a few minor changes, Thanks for the comments everyone, i've been kinda busy lately so i was really surprised to log on here and see this deck front page (I facepalmed hard).

0
Posted 10 March 2011 at 11:21 as a comment on UNBEATABLE DECK

Permalink

How dare you.

0
Posted 10 March 2011 at 11:18 in reply to #139567 on UNBEATABLE DECK

Permalink

Holy crap, comments on this deck, where did they come from?

0
Posted 10 March 2011 at 04:10 as a comment on UNBEATABLE DECK

Permalink

I'm sorry that you thought this was a serious deck, apparently you have yet to lean the jokes concerning most of the cards in this deck.

0
Posted 05 March 2011 at 11:18 in reply to #138023 on UNBEATABLE DECK

Permalink

Well, there's the well know and unbeatable island+island+storm crow combo. And great wall makes it so your opponent can't use planeswalkers. You just need to read the cards better to understand how broken this really is.

3
Posted 05 March 2011 at 09:40 in reply to #137816 on UNBEATABLE DECK

Permalink

Alright, added 4, even if this deck is over 60 cards i don't think it matters with creatures this broken.

0
Posted 05 March 2011 at 09:38 in reply to #137828 on UNBEATABLE DECK

Permalink

Why not add a tutor instead of playing basilisk collar? Seems like that would be more effective.

0
Posted 04 March 2011 at 14:30 as a comment on Cthulhu! (;,;)

Permalink

Phyresis is black.

0
Posted 03 March 2011 at 19:16 in reply to #136697 on mono RED infect

Permalink

Thanks for the suggestions though, i think i'll test adventuring gear.

0
Posted 03 March 2011 at 19:14 in reply to #137253 on mono RED infect

Permalink

Because the land you pull comes in tapped.

0
Posted 03 March 2011 at 11:46 in reply to #137120 on White Warfare ww

Permalink

*facepalm

0
Posted 03 March 2011 at 11:45 in reply to #136923 on White Warfare ww

Permalink

Read the card, the Leyline hits an opponent's graveyard.

1
Posted 03 March 2011 at 11:40 in reply to #136822 on Vampiric touch

Permalink

21-40 of 72 items