s0rinmark0v

236 Decks, 2,281 Comments, 457 Reputation

I am now adding some Ad Nauseam to my deck. Nice card for this type of deck

0
Posted 03 February 2015 at 07:28 as a comment on Ad Treasure Storm

Permalink

Good luck finding them...

1
Posted 31 January 2015 at 01:05 in reply to #532943 on Anti-Guild: Gruul Rules!

Permalink

Big creatures and nasty effects. I like it. Still not playing Gruul though. I'll stick to Dimir and Rakdos

1
Posted 30 January 2015 at 23:58 as a comment on Anti-Guild: Gruul Rules!

Permalink

1) No, not all of the cards need the Guild Emblem but most should. This is a guild deck after all. Besides, I've never seen a deck made entirely out of guild cards
2) No. Make it all rares if you wish
3) No. The usual amount of 60 is recommended unless you play Battle of Wits

0
Posted 30 January 2015 at 22:53 in reply to #532599 on Anti-Guild Challenge!

Permalink

Not trying to ruin this whole budget-hate, but besides the added cost of the 200+ lands in here, this deck is a budget deck. However in saying that, any deck based arouns Treaure Hunt is because it contains 8-12 actual cards

Also, if you're interested, I will make a not budget (or even very pricey) deck that is good and take back the hot page from budget decks!

-1
Posted 29 January 2015 at 07:28 in reply to #531289 on Deck of Wits and Stupidity

Permalink

Lets not go there.....

0
Posted 28 January 2015 at 08:38 in reply to #531289 on Deck of Wits and Stupidity

Permalink

Vintage/Legacy. Modern deck.
Good idea though

0
Posted 24 January 2015 at 23:45 in reply to #530085 on Deck of Wits and Stupidity

Permalink

I know how you feel. Funny enough, decks like this that make it onto the hot page for me are SO INCREDIBLY STUPID even by my standards and people love them, yet a serious deck with great potential goes by unnoticed

2
Posted 24 January 2015 at 23:44 in reply to #531289 on Deck of Wits and Stupidity

Permalink

Barrens came to mind before Chapel. They're also cheaper and gain life
I know they aren't the best of lands but could be very useful in the deck

0
Posted 24 January 2015 at 23:41 in reply to #530879 on I Am Sorin. Beware My Wrath

Permalink

Give up and start a new game. I am only a casual player too, but I would recommend putting draw into the SB

0
Posted 22 January 2015 at 01:29 in reply to #528883 on SUCK MY GOAT TOKENS!!!

Permalink

Adding swamps sounds good for a deck like this but it doesn't help most of the cards. In fact it hiders them! However it sounds like a good idea. If I had some X cards, then I would be SBing them

0
Posted 21 January 2015 at 10:42 in reply to #530110 on This is My Swamp

Permalink

Some days you simply need Healer of the Pride because you need to recover your life and if you have Warden/Attendant, your life total stays the same with Trading Post but with Healer you gain a life and have a 0/1 token. Not to mention that Warden/Attendant are only as useful as Suture Priest when they don't play any creatures. Decks without a lot of creatures are pretty common where I play

However, if you want some in an SB then I would highly encourage it

0
Posted 20 January 2015 at 01:12 in reply to #528883 on SUCK MY GOAT TOKENS!!!

Permalink

This is based on my old standard deck that I want to convert into modern. Which is simply replace some of the cards for a better modern version e.g. Shock for Lightning Bolt

0
Posted 20 January 2015 at 01:09 in reply to #529447 on Modern Rakdos Aggro

Permalink

Ok...... I am now back from my 12 day tour of the Pacific!
Thank you all for the help you have given me. For everyone who has commented about me needing Tutors for this deck, I am starting to agree with you. I am ...... was ...... in the middle of adding them into the SB in order to decide which ones to have mainboard but I went away and had no internet. Not that I wanted it...

And to answer someone's question from earlier, this was originally a troll deck that I didn't think would go anywhere like this.

0
Posted 20 January 2015 at 01:06 as a comment on Deck of Wits and Stupidity

Permalink

I didn't think of that.

0
Posted 07 January 2015 at 00:46 in reply to #527462 on Deck of Wits and Stupidity

Permalink

You can normally tell by the card used as the deck's picture. E.g. This deck uses Nivix Cyclpos which is OBVIOUSLY not standard. This is when you use NinjaStyle612's solution

0
Posted 06 January 2015 at 07:03 in reply to #526559 on Standard: $20 Izzet 4 Turn Win

Permalink

I am in the process of adding search cards into the SB sine so many people have told me to use them. If you could leave a list of Modern legal ones, then please do so I can add them

0
Posted 06 January 2015 at 06:58 in reply to #526937 on Deck of Wits and Stupidity

Permalink

Zombie Infestation. You certainly did your homework, genius

1
Posted 03 January 2015 at 02:10 in reply to #525398 on Deck of Wits and Stupidity

Permalink

It only adds the cost of the lands because there are 200 of them. The deck without most of them is about $30

0
Posted 03 January 2015 at 02:09 in reply to #525232 on Deck of Wits and Stupidity

Permalink

The deck has been untouched for months now. Memnite has probably forgotten about it and I for one don't go and change tags very often. It's not like Kahns just came out and Ravnica went while the deck was still hot

No point whining, dude.

2
Posted 03 January 2015 at 02:07 in reply to #526559 on Standard: $20 Izzet 4 Turn Win

Permalink

361-380 of 2,278 items