Quasimofo

Holding spots for Urza, M. Besieged, Rebuild, P. Vista

You are correct, Azami makes for better card drawing.

I have still, to this day, not finished the 20 card sideboard for this particular EDH deck. Any and all suggestions would be most appreciated.

With all these long winded posts, I have decided to keep mine short and to the point. This deck is terrible, and you are a twit.

Decided to nix the old version of this deck and update appropriately with the changes I've made over time. This is the deck as it exists currently, and I am quite proud of it.

It is wonderful to see you have returned. As you can see, I have as well. I ask you as a fellow lover of all things dark and twisted, to look at my most recent deck. Although there are still some cobwebs to loose, I believe after all my truancy, I still have a knack for decks that cause great consternation. As well, I believe someone so well read as yourself would not only understand the deck's name, but get a chuckle out of it.

http://www.mtgvault.com/quasimofo/decks/oedipus/

If you'd be so kind.

I will get around to it once I'm no longer quashed by work.

Hello indeed...

This is quite the impressive 'aggravation for the sake of aggravation' deck. I must admit, however, that unless you are running a ChronoStasis deck, using Chronatog makes very little sense.

I daresay in that way I have you beat for hateful, nightmarish decks that use Chronatog.

For your viewing pleasure. http://www.mtgvault.com/quasimofo/decks/doesnt-play-well-with-others/

Lastly, while I enjoy Forbid as much as the next man, make note not to be too reckless with it. It would be most embarrassing to lose as a result of overzealous 'forbidding'.

Thank you for the kind words. Endrek always intrigued me, and so when EDH began to grow in popularity, he was one of the first commanders I tried. It has certainly changed and improved quite a lot since then. Phyrexian Tower might come in useful, so thank you for the recommendation.

Now that is some literature worth quoting!

I quite like this. It has a, well, 'smoothness' to it that is very appealing. My one concern is in regards to some items of your sideboard. While I can see both Wear/Tear and Abrupt Decay coming in useful, I worry about their costs. With Mana Confluence your only means of casting them, it leave me feeling you could run into a snag.

I daresay I am entirely unsure if he's a crafty troll or just a mere twat.

I apologize for the tardiness of my reply, but I've been most busy as of late. And as much as I would gladly give any advice I could, it appears the deck is nonexistent. Perhaps it was an incorrect link? The above Shakespeare deck link is clearly incorrect, so it's not out of the question.

While I am happy to oblige and offer what knowledge I can, I am admittedly only really knowledgable in all things control. If you would like some sound advice, ask my aggro playing counterpart, DoTheWumpus.

Indeed, they differ only in name.

Very well. Ask, and you shall receive.

http://www.mtgvault.com/quasimofo/decks/wibbly-wobbly-timey-wimey/

Indeed. You may still pay into the X cost of the spell, but a spell like Fireball, for example, would have its initial cost of one red (before the X) removed.

I actually have one if you are interested.

That's quite alright. Prison is a lesser known form of control magic, and I'm not entirely sure it can be done on a low budget, or at least as low as you aim to go...Though you have surprised us all on more than one occasion.

While I must unfortunately say this was not what I meant by Prison, it is quite a wonderful deck all the same. All in all, I'm satisfied. Well done my friend.