That could work, thanks
Permalink
I've never been a huge fan of just playing decklists card-for-card, but if you think Delver would be a good addition in this shell, I'll go with it. What should I cut?
Okay, cool. Thank you for your input.
Do you think this deck is competitive in the current format? I want to get into modern, and this deck looks fun to play. Almost like a poor man's Storm.
Okay, thanks
That's a good idea, thanks. Do you have any ideas for the sideboard?
A deck should always be 60 cards, for the sake of consistency. Just cut it.
I'm not really a fan of Disciple of the Old Ways here. At best, it's a 2/2 for 1GR with First Strike, and it doesn't help your LD plan. Cut it.
No problem
This looks great, and supremely annoying. I would hate to play agains this.
I think that, in order to make a deck like this work, you need four Eidolon of Blossoms. I'd cut the Eternal Thirsts or the Dictates of Erebos to make room for them.
I feel like GS would work. If you can afford Scrublands, use those, obviously.
I love the deck, as Slivers are my favorite creature type in all of magic, although Goblins are a close second. However, I don't feel like BTN is main-deckable. As a three-of on sideboard, definitely. But I'd replace the copies in the MD should be replaced with one each of Constricting and Megantic.
Sweet, I was going to suggest that kind of deck.
Hey, is there any white or red enchantment removal in the current standard? If so I'd like to add it to the sideboard.
Nice compromise.
Yeah, I always run 20 in my 3CMC decks, so it immediately felt off to me.
Maybe it is. I've never played this deck, so I don't really know. I recommend trying it both ways.
Cool, I didn't know if 21 lands was a necessity.
I feel like you need 24 lands to make this work, since you don't have the luxury of accelerating with Manaweft Sliver. I'd cut a Thorncaster for another Swamp.
1-20 of 90 items