Memnite

11 Decks, 118 Comments, 160 Reputation

If i wanted to play this deck properly with the inistrad block id just copy the izzet blitz decklist because the flashback and draw in that list is far more powerful than anything that m14 offers

0
Posted 01 August 2013 at 04:00 in reply to #385020 on Standard: $20 Izzet 4 Turn Win

Permalink

I dont think you understand how cipher works lmao

0
Posted 01 August 2013 at 03:58 in reply to #385034 on Izzet combo $17

Permalink

I like this a lot
Sort of reminds me of my Boros Burn
http://www.mtgvault.com/memnite/decks/standard-boros-burn-rush/

If it were me I'd take out the plains because I don't think it's worth splashing white and you're going to have a better mana base
To replace Boros Charm (which is a very good card) I'd play Skullcrack
I'd also take out Boros Elite and put in Dynacharge which makes all of Pyromancers tokens 3/1

1
Posted 01 August 2013 at 01:44 as a comment on black red burn

Permalink

You only need Nivix Cylcops to attack once to win
Hidden strings is therefore useless and young pyromancer is too slow to be of use

1
Posted 01 August 2013 at 01:32 as a comment on Izzet combo $17

Permalink

Hey thanks man, it's true arftul dodge is waaaaay better than teleportal but because I want the deck to be in standard after innistrad rotates I'm only using cards from Ravnica and M14

If you do want to play the deck with Innistrad cards in it (which i think is a much better version because Innistrad has really cheap ass draw cards which this deck loves, and it also has lots of spells with flashback)
Heres a link to a budget "Izzet Blitz" (you can also find the first version on the same website)
http://www.channelfireball.com/articles/woo-brews-izzet-blitz-updated-and-budgeted/

-1
Posted 01 August 2013 at 01:12 in reply to #385020 on Standard: $20 Izzet 4 Turn Win

Permalink

Im proud of you son

0
Posted 01 August 2013 at 01:07 in reply to #384915 on Standard: $20 Izzet 4 Turn Win

Permalink

Tribute to hunger rotates soon

What makes you think that I won't have my own counterspells?

0
Posted 01 August 2013 at 00:50 in reply to #384850 on Standard: $20 Izzet 4 Turn Win

Permalink

The thing is, with electromancer out both essence scatter and negate only cost 1 blue to cast
Yea I want to get more draw in here too but all the draw cards in standard are costly in terms of mana
Nivmagus is a good choice, i'll put it in the side deck

0
Posted 01 August 2013 at 00:48 in reply to #384972 on Standard: $20 Izzet 4 Turn Win

Permalink

I reckon I'm just going to put in dispels just so I can counter that 1 card that they use to try and shut down Nivix before he attacks

0
Posted 01 August 2013 at 00:46 in reply to #384970 on Standard: $20 Izzet 4 Turn Win

Permalink

Dont want Innistrad
Dont want artful dodge

0
Posted 01 August 2013 at 00:45 in reply to #384915 on Standard: $20 Izzet 4 Turn Win

Permalink

Putting in more pump cards is redundant haha
You only need the ones listed to 1 shot

I really dont like the rings either, 5 to cast, 5 to use but this deck needs a tutor card to find the last piece to your combo to win

0
Posted 01 August 2013 at 00:45 in reply to #384886 on Standard: $20 Izzet 4 Turn Win

Permalink

Yea while your deck might be better (MIGHT) it's also 150 dollars more expensive
GJ

0
Posted 01 August 2013 at 00:43 in reply to #377949 on Charming American

Permalink

Aetherize is a terrible card just saying

That's the reason I say to hold at least 1 counterspell before you attack

Jesus every deck has it's weakness I could say I can beat the top 8 Gruul Aggro deck with a bunch of fogs and azorius charm too buddy

Do you think Im trying to go pro with this $20 dollar deck?
This is obviously mainly for fun in an FNM environment if anything

0
Posted 01 August 2013 at 00:40 in reply to #384850 on Standard: $20 Izzet 4 Turn Win

Permalink

That's nice your $100+ competitive deck can beat my $20 peasant deck
Do you feel proud of yourself? :)

2
Posted 01 August 2013 at 00:37 in reply to #384680 on Standard: $20 Izzet 4 Turn Win

Permalink

"A deck that is extremely popular amongst seasoned players."
It's very rare to see a tournament in which pro players run mono-black
In fact the whole point of this Ravanica block is to encourage people to run duo decks

"The whole point of mono black control is to try to counter all the top meta decks by controlling everything while still winning through a bomb on the field."
I don't think this deck will perform very well vs the current meta

If you want a true monoblack take out the red and add any of the Lilianas
Get a full set of Desecration demons/Vampire Nighthawks/Doom Blades too

Please do not make up things like this to make your deck seem more impressive than it actually is

2
Posted 31 July 2013 at 14:20 as a comment on Mono Black Control v2

Permalink

Like I said we all make mistakes :P

0
Posted 31 July 2013 at 11:24 in reply to #384680 on Standard: $20 Izzet 4 Turn Win

Permalink

No problem, we all make mistakes

0
Posted 31 July 2013 at 10:43 in reply to #384680 on Standard: $20 Izzet 4 Turn Win

Permalink

Read its effect before you comment...
"and can attack this turn as though it didn't have defender"

1
Posted 31 July 2013 at 10:23 in reply to #384680 on Standard: $20 Izzet 4 Turn Win

Permalink

woah $3/$5 boosters from aus where...

0
Posted 31 July 2013 at 06:42 in reply to #382904 on Battleborn Hydras

Permalink

I thought about that but I was a bit reluctant
Even with Goblin Electromancer it costs so much to cast !

I can see where you're coming from though

Dragonform is like overloaded teleportal+dynacharge in 1

0
Posted 27 July 2013 at 00:53 in reply to #383271 on Standard: Izzet Token Ctrl Brn

Permalink

61-80 of 109 items