Thinker

I needed the name to verify with other sites. It is true that the middle initial wasn't needed but that is the reason why I would like the last name. Also, the Manasource did a video on this deck before you posted this deck.

Middle initial and last name please. Thank you.

I would but what other card could I put in this deck that I would want? Lightning bolt was the closest thing I could find.

Who's the creator?

I can always add Evolving Wilds but the only issue I see with it is that is that ut may be a little slow but I can always try it out.

Okay I guess that makes sense but we still don't know if the that is the case here.

Thanks for the comments. Also, why would I need mana ramp? The deck survives by itself really well before turn five and after you get your combo off their are almost no situations in which I have lost.

This kind of makes sense. You want to pay respects to the publisher of this deck because he/she introduced it to you and you do so by liking the deck. That makes sense but it seems a little unfair in my eyes as someone who hasn't thought of the concept for the deck is getting the credit for it. If anything this sounds almost like plagiarism, but that's just my opinion. I respect the deck being liked now.

I'm still confused why we're liking a concept that has been made multiple times before.

I like the concept of the deck but I still don't understand why Skitter of Lizards and Nyxborn Rollikicker are in the deck. Still +1. Also, congratulations on having the deck with the 2nd most likes on the hot page!(I'm trailing as I have the deck with the 3rd most likes Ahaha).

You do know that the concept has been around before. Also, why are we all liking a deck that has no difference from the original deck idea?(I don't mean to be mean or make you gain less likes just curious.

Dang man thanks. You really know how to play my own deck. Ahaha.

I would be running Beseech and Infernal Tutor, but the issue I have with Infernal Tutor is that it is very expensive and I like to keep decks as budget as possible(Heck, I'm even disappointed with this deck because it runs over $35). I also feel like Beseech aside from it's cost(in $) can be replaced with a three mana transmute card. However, Palace Siege is an amazing replacement for Conjurer's Closet, and because of it the credit of the deck belongs to you.

I like the concept and it seems that it would work even better in pauper since your two core pieces of the deck seem to fit into the format.

You mean Flash Hulk?

I think the deck works fine but I'd probably add the Renegade Doppleganger into the main board and take out Eater of Days. Also, I'd change Stifle into Glaring Spotlight, and remove Torper Orb for some more draw/search cards. You might also want to splash black in for Spoils of the Vault.

Dang I made a deck like this before but during that format I was able to bounce creatures. +1

No problem and yes you can combo Touch of Moonglove with Breaker of Armies, but deadly wanderings already gives him deathtouch. If you have anymore questions or would like for me to check out a deck of your just ask.

First, we were all new to this game in which we were all newbs. Now to answer your question. If your opponent blocks with multiple creatures then you get to choose how your creature assigns combat damage to their creature(s). Also, if a scenario like the 8 1/1 tokens occurred, then you get to deal ten damage to the opposing creatures in any fashion. Thus, all eight tokens would go down along with your giant because your giant would deal one damage to each of the tokens, and if it had trample, it would have two remaining damage to hit your opponent or one of their planeswalkers.

Cool concept but the deck seems kind of slow. Also, Tibalt is my favorite Planeswalker :) +1(for creative thinking not Tibalt).