God it's so refreshing someone who is not an idiot here. You do have 2x Din of the Fireherd in there however.Seems well built, I'd expect more defensive tools or some other degenerate combo/anything besides the ol' steal and sack.
Permalink
Why no fixing?Why not something like Abundant Growth instead of the farseek?
Why not win more games and go down to 60 cards?In most games, would you rather draw Knight of Glory or Consulate Skygate? The knight, so just cut the wall and increase the chances of drawing the knight. Repeat the thought process till your deck is 4 times as effective and 60 cards.
Hmm, why 65 cards? And I take it this from cards you have, else there is on reason in the universe to run only 2 bolts, 20 lands when your creatures are as expensive as 6-8 and Ordeal of Heliod
A worthy effort, but I can't see this working in modern. Any reason why the staples are missing?Dark confidantVampire NighthawkLashwritheLiliana of the VeilKorlashKalitas, Traitor of GhetGatekeeper of MalakirDismemberPhyrexian ArenaWrench MindMutavault+Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth ?
Wait, what? Top got banned. (one of us is an idiot here) I bet it aint me.Wait, what? Why not Snapcaster? (cash I'd imagine)
I think you'd want more creatures that mill you as well as more creatures that benefit from you getting milled.Oh, and a lot few gnaws, the card is only really good against burn or when you are about to turn the corner against an aggressive deck.As it is, you creatures that win games will be tiny and few, well, see for yourself, the draw sample hand button doesn't lie.
Me too actually xD Totally went over my head. Though, besides the obvious 2 mana counterspells it wants to be played in place of here - what else would you cut? Keeping in mind that Disrupting Shoal requires a decent distribution of mana costs.
Lovely xD
A very, very nice explanation. I have not played that much Grixis control in modern, not enough to be able to argue on the statistics of AV, but I can definitely see how this version of the deck would be better.Although, how do you fare against AV decks?
Hmm, an interesting take then. Although, delver decks are best when the aim of the deck is to capitalize on the sheer tempo the card gives.I would probably make something along the lines of a basic grixis control deck, be it with artifact lands or without. Not sure how I would improve this one as it stands.
I did not even see the delirium difficulty! Nice! Another argument for more Inversions, because they are tribal which counts too
How many people did MTGGoldfish inspire? xD You're the fifth person I saw building this today.That said, Dimir House Guard as a playset is something I love. The lack of Kalitas - not so much. Just as I am not a fan of the lack of either card draw, Lili or Inquisition.
Seems like a lot of work to make Angler work. And 3 colors in an aggressive deck in pauper seems weak too. Thoughts?
Finally! My kinda guy!Raven's Crime seems too many, although, I myself have played 3 in some metagames in loam decks.I hate to see Nameless Inversion as just a 1-of, I abhor it.Lili *feels* like it should be more than a 2of, but that might well be just as feeling.
What's path for?Ensnaring Bridge seems to have its job covered
The lack of Smallpox disgusts me xD
The focus of the deck being?
Bob and Lili would like to join, any reason why they weren't invited?
Fetch lands (even Evolving Wilds) for easier delirium.
341-360 of 1,250 items