TheGreatGodLoki

You claim to know all these pro players, but when mentioned by them, or should I just say the one player you linked you said "I was mentioned as some guy" proves you really aren't anyone. So why you double down on saying all of this is beyond me.

You said you could get your buddy to write a follow up article, I said sure. That has yet to appear. You've mentioned you met other pro players, but they've never mentioned you. You mention you're a big name in your community, yet when googled/pressed for information you've either ignored or posted that Newgrounds video.

So at the end of the day, you either need to prove you're who you are, and I've said just send a link. Prove you were in a 10,000 player tournament, show me you know these pros. But time and time again you've failed to anything.

But that wasn't enough for you, because as I've stated you've used it as a way to gate people and label those who question you as a troll. So again and again. Answer my question.

People will come and go sure. But see, it's easy. You said you placed #234 in a 10,000 person tournament. So find that article and show me.

Too circular? Sure I mean, I guess asking for one basic need is too much. But at the same time you'll still hitting your chest claiming to this site what a god you are, what a pro player you are, what a miracle worker you are all the while living a false identity in your circle.

So how about you just prove me wrong. Answer my question.

Wicked. Answer my question and stop dodging it.


As for the entitled part? You're only entitled to gatekeeping if you're the pro you say you are. But since you haven't been able to answer the question then you're a fraud.

No. You're right Tylo, they don't have to prove anything. However, when you go out of your way to tell me you're a pro player, or know pro players, or been around pro players, or posted really high up in tournaments, and then have the audacity to use that as the basis of gate keeping, then I think I'm entitled to know who you are.

Without it, it's baseless evidence being used in an attempt to keep others in line.

Tylo, I neve claimed to be a reasonable and good person. I just pointed out exactly why I have beef with this man. And I've told him several times to either nut up or shut up his claims of his past.

Holy fuck that's absolutely hilarious Bask. Makes this comment I replied to you with absolutely more hilarious knowing it's all an act.

He did. He's claimed he's a pro. Wish I had saved those screen captures, however, a few comments down I had quoted his now deleted comment, but I will copy it to here. The " are his quotes, and the * are my replies to it


Let's break this down


"Here's a deal, if I manage to contact olle råde, and give him the full story and make him post a followup where I'm credited as wickeddarkman, will you then promise to improve your deck descriptions and join my good guy list ?"

** How about you leave me alone, and everyone else alone, and if you have questions about a deck you just ask. A lot of decks or self evident. This deck sure is. I don't think I needed to add one, but I felt like it since I felt strong about it before coming to my senses and realizing it's an awful deck**

"Olle råde happens to be a frequent 93/94 player in Denmark and he's often battling it out with a pro friend of mine whom I'm in touch with. I actually got the contacts to make him write a followup whe he gets to hear the "other side of the faerie tail"

** Make him write a follow up. Bro that doesn't even sound like legit. It sounds like you're going to beg him by saying "Look man, I know I dueled you once when you made that deck but please credit me"**


"I could even get a contact to thomas enevoldsen to have him confirm that I am indeed wickeddarkman.
He is one of those who called me wicked as I mostly went by my internet name during tournaments. I actually trolled the entire Danish meta by listing planeswalkerpoints for a whole year where it turned out I was the 12th best player. It caused quite a stir and I recorded all lists together in one major list to showcase it."

**I can //kinda\\ buy that nickname thing as cringy and made up as it fucking sounds. But whatever man. That next paragraph fucking killed me. Do you know how made up and smug you sound in that part? Bro I bet it boiled down to everyone wondering who the fuck the idiot going by "WickedDarkMan" is and when you said "I am" with a smug hoping people would be surprised, they looked at you awkwardly and said "Cool."


"I held the contest for my lotus & moxen to prove a point about manabases to convince others of how much impact they can have, and to really drive the point in, the contest was set up so the participants would have to think out of the box and produce something new."

**Did you also take the grand prize because you showed up with a "out of box deck"?

Oh and, before you delete your comment I uhh screen shotted it here for future reference. So uhh enjoy

https://imgur.com/a/GLHv8QA

So again, the question I've been asking you all week.

*IF* you're a pro player *WITH* connections to other pro players *AND* you've won multiple tournaments, then you'll have no problem telling me who you are. This is really where it boils down it.

See you seem to think you have this absolute power because you're some sort of "amazing" pro player, and that by proxy we should all bow down and worship you because of it because your knowledge is far superior to those of us non-pro players.

However, you keep dodging this question. You keep trying to actively *NOT* answer it. And because most of us don't take you at your word, and in fact ignore you, it makes you angry. It makes you so angry you label us as trolls.

I've never posted one incorrect thing about you, I've posted the same links, the same quotes, the same decks. Just because you cannot and will not ever back up what you say just causes you to lose your shit.

I read your stuff, and I answer back. You then delete it if you sense I'm correct *OR* to cover your tracks. You said "I've been working at a postal house" by anyones' comment grasp of the English language all the words you've use are in *PRESENT* tense. However, just now you accused me of reading it wrong. Now if you had implied you used to work there, or no longer worked there, you'd have said something more akin to "I *USED* to work a postal house" , but seeing as the only way you can speak is through your long cryptic, go nowhere deck descriptions, I can see why you got confused.

So at the end of the day you'll never escape me until your "parents" come and save you. Because someone like you should *NEVER* be doing what you're doing.

So tick tock Wicked.

Wasn't that hard was it fraud boy.

Thanks for the info. So what you're telling me is you were never a pro player. Got it. You're a fucking mail man.....

Now bare in Mind Krashx, he's been deleting all comments on there for better or worse. That despite multiple comments from NotADoctor, instead of heeding advice, he goes on a tangent about all he needs to work on is the land and rat count and then, as he puts it "the rest"

But not before delivering an essay on what the human condition is. In short, to deflect from the fact that NotADoctor pointed out valid and reasonable flaws in this deck, he wouldn't admit and instead used random words to express a random point.

When cornered again by NotA, he then went on again about land count and rats and then meekly mentioned "When all of these battles against the testdecks are done I will have a clear number of exactly how many rats the deck is going to contain, and then, only then I start to pick out cards to battle the metagame."

When a normal person would've started in reverse order, but by somehow magically editing rat numbers after losing 300 games will what you be weak to become clear.

Now even an "ex-pro" as we've all put would know, you design a deck AROUND a meta game/the most popular deck, or you start with answers to your decks most weakest points. He instead decides to ignore all rational thought, and tell us that (to paraphrase) "Is it my deck that is bad? No. It's the land and rat count that is" even someone with half a brain understands how deck building works.

In short, he's EITHER a shitty deck builder OR a non-important "ex-pro" player trying to boost his ego.

(and side note, whenever I question him about all of this he deletes, ignores, or responds in his self fulling prophesy paragraphs because he knows I'm right)

Now another deck of his to show similarities is this one (https://www.mtgvault.com/wickeddarkman/decks/mtgvault-tips-tricks/) where, again Notadoctor, proceeds to tell him exactly why his deck is wrong, why his deck won't work, and why his idea is flawed. Instead of accepting any of this, he proceeds to say **"In my experience, when you start winning with 1 deck, a local meta will adjust to it, and know to sideboard against you. I've been trying out different numbers of decks in the past and having 6 different decks was the perfect number for me when playing weekly for a whole year. All decks saw an equal amount of play, and I randomized the play pattern before even attending the tournaments, having the whole thing mapped out."**

So his whole "idea" on playing an awful deck is that he plans to shake up any meta game he goes to and to have everyone magically change their decks to beat this one and THEN he'll bring in a different deck which will give him an edge.

Let me speak from experience because it seems Wicked doesn't have any to begin with. I played BorderPost Restore Balance at my LGS for like 2 weeks. You know what happened on those 2 weeks? Nothing. No one edited their decks to face a random Restore Balance deck, but you know what they did do? Adjust to the new hotness, at the time, was Hollow One (pre faithless ban). You know why? Because unlike Wickeds awful mill deck which would cause them to *occasionally* lose 1 game, if they didn't prep for Hollow One and its popularity, they'd be going 0-3 constantly. They didn't care about *my* deck because it wasn't worth their time when even in a real meta it barely had 2 decks making any showing.

*ONE* deck will shake up a meta game *IF* the sudden popularity of it causes a shift. However what Wicked is saying is just untrue. Players will not, generally speaking, make adjustments for just *ONE* deck because it's a waste of their time, money, and resources to do so. I would not pull in protection in my SB against mill if I knew the other 5 most popular decks were jund. If he had ever attended a LGS or any legal WoTC sanctioned tournament, he'd know this. He'd have a basic understanding of how a meta game works, instead he attempts to disguise his lack of anything with long words and dazzling sentences hoping it'll be enough to stop you. NotA commented back with more knowledge and he's been quiet on it ever since.

This is where the divide lays with me.

At the same time, I can't. I've met people like him. They think they're the best people in the world, but when their 13 card combo doesn't work at their LGS then suddenly it's everyone else's fault but theirs.

And don't you find it weird that despite not owning this site, not being a mod on this site, or have any sort of bearing on this site he has his own set of rules.

That in large is a huge issue for me, that I cannot use this site because some on here has decided it's theirs now. That if you don't follow this imaginary set you'll be forever labeled as a troll. Weird huh. Because last I check I can post, comment, and do whatever I want on here and some dude shouldn't be the end all be all.

And this relates to why you won't tell me who you are why?

I don't delete because unlike you I got nothing to hide.

You can keep deleting my comments but that only proves my point. If you truly have nothing to hide then you'll have no worries about telling me who you are.

But until then you'll never see the end of me. Do you think Brian Kibbler hides on Reddit? Do you think LSV hides on Twitter? No. Because unlike you they have nothing to hide and no one has sent them dead cats in the mail

Just answer my questions and this can all end Wicked.
You're either a fraud or a no name *"ex pro"*

Tick tock

Psh. Go for it bro. What happens when they realize it's just me.

You mean those that got tired of your gate keeping? I don't take responsibility for this. What I do is my own responsibility. They are doing it on their own.

They're tired of your constant gate keeping, constant monitoring, and constantly nagging.

YYou misconstrued my "bad deck" sentence. There's 'bad' for stuff like matchups, meta, and consistency. And there are 'bad' decks where you know it won't work (see my Strixhaven Stadium jank) but still convincing others that by adding a singular card you'll suddenly warp the meta game on its head (see the majority of Mill decks that NotaDoctor commented on) .



Nice to you, but only until you mess up by his rules and forget to add deck descriptions, sideboard, or refuse his list offer.

My decks are weirdly viewed because I occasionally post to LGS discord with them when I'm seeking advice.

It's not that his decks have a possibility of a 85% win rate. It's the fact he deletes any comment that gives advice or tells him his idea won't work.

If he's an "ex-pro" then he should know that a rat deck will not work, will not draw the opponent off balance, and will not magically solve its problem by adding just flying defense.

He claims to have this otherworldly knowledge, but cannot back it up in any deck building lists he provides. Ideas are fine **if** backed up by some sort of competent deck structure. However, peddling awful deck ideas and claiming they'll work, they're amazing, and they'll throw anyone off balance is not only misleading but downright awful to anyone who takes his shit seriously.