more gatekeepers, more tectonic edge, and why are you playing so many 1-ofs??? doesn't look consistent enough to me
Permalink
this deck looks good, but i don't know if just 2 jwar isle is enough of a win con...(caw-go had doj to deal with it, and they would save them and have a couple of spell pierce and mana leak waiting for you to try to stop them by that time) i would add more win cons. definatly creeping tar pits (unless they cost too much)
i am having a hard time seeing how you are trying to win (infect or damage) I would either go one or the other, trying both and just seeing how which one will get there first isn't really a good stratigy. it lowers consistency. if you are going infect, i would add inkmoth nexus to it. that card is rediculously good. (i am also a fan of sacred wolf. the art on it is fantastic and troll shroud is great) btw: http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=145645
is that a challenge i hear???
o-ring isn't standard
i don't think you have enough artifacts in this deck to play kuldotha rebirth
yah, add 4 more lands. this deck is defiantly for casual
... i think that made sense, and yah, because cards like doomblade, go for the throat, duress, and inquisition are all a dead draw in some matchups, which is why i am not playing a full set of each. any suggestions on more good cards i could play???
flame slash is good against the ever threatening wall of omens and overgrown battlements. so that would be a very good idea sideboard, but it would do next to nothing againt control decks. I like Red Sun's Zenith (although, it is no banefire) when you get alot of mana it is good, but in my opinion, that is were pyromancer's ascension comes into play lategame. (if you ever make it to "lategame"(rdw shouldn't make it to lategame)) I do love cumbust, but punishing fire is more against vampires and highborn. because when they try to combo off, you do too. I do like the idea of adding chandra's spitfire, and fling is a good idea too, what do you think is better, plated geopede, or chandra's spitfire???
thanks, i'll keep that in mind
what about calcite snapper and sturdy hatchling?
yah, the more of each creach you have, the more consistent your deck will be. and if you are going with vampires, white isn't really needed
all of these cards are standard except knight of the white orchid mainboard. (your sideboard isn't though) If you want it to be tournament quality, you might as well make a few changes to make it standard.
yah, that is a good idea. i wouldn't do it to my actual deck, because one of my teammates uses snow plains. but if he didn't, i would.
you might want to start throwing some split-lands in your deck. with multicolored decks, you can't let having the wrong lands get in your way.
what about vengevine, even if it doesn't fit the rest of the deck, it is so amazing with fauna, that its creature type is kinda irrevelant. (just an idea)
so you made this deck just for me??? awe thanks, that was so kind of you (blushes)
i would try marshial coup, it is better than phyrexian rebirth, so as long as your not goin for standard, it is a better choice
hey surewhynot, i was wondering if you had any advice on how to get known or "popular" 'cause i have been making some very good decks and almost no attention. any suggestions or advice for me? also I really like your decks (i am your 100th follower btw(i thought that was cool)) they are very fun
i would try to thin it out to be 60 cards. i would take out the divine offerings(it is more of a sideboard card), darksteel myr shouldn't ever see play (EVER) i will agree it can be good with tempered steel and equiptments, but I still think it is kinda weak. the Auriok Replica is kinda random, and i would have masters call mainboard. overall, this deck looks like alot of fun, but just needs a few more things worked out before it is perfect(you must have either 0, or 15 cards in a sideboard)
81-100 of 149 items