MDStrawHat

110 Decks, 126 Comments, 9 Reputation

Madman i like your name but hope you don't do to much off the stuff. : P You wanna improve you're deck then why not size up against my elf decks I've got 2. Try and figure out if yours would beat mine and if not than think what/how to improve. It would help me to know as well so.

0
Posted 08 March 2010 at 20:17 as a comment on OMG! its another elf deck...

Permalink

Great Deck mate...mmm i wonder which card inspired this?!!!

0
Posted 08 March 2010 at 20:07 as a comment on TRADER, TRADER!

Permalink

Cool Deck i'd like to play it. + 1

0
Posted 08 March 2010 at 19:30 as a comment on Elf ramp face smash deck

Permalink

Looks like a very serious deck and i would love to play it with mine i'm a bit of a n00b... i say abit i started playing casually back in 1999 when mercadian masques had just come out, might do a tourney someday.

0
Posted 08 March 2010 at 19:26 as a comment on Something Old, New, Borrowed ,and Blue

Permalink

mmm i'm interested...... Looks complex and clever too

0
Posted 08 March 2010 at 19:14 as a comment on Yet Another Sneak Attack Deck

Permalink

Hi you commented on my Deck so im commenting on yours.

A Sound deck i think. A good ratio of creatures against other stuff. Child of Night might work that has lifelink and therefore might fit your deck

0
Posted 17 February 2010 at 07:23 as a comment on Vampires-Zendikar/ M10

Permalink

Please to anyone else who comments which would be better 2 Niv-Mizzet, the Fireminds or 2 Malfegors??

please don't decide on how good the card is individually but how good you think it works in my deck.

PLEASE READ ABOVE PLEASE READ ABOVE PLEASE READ ABOVE PLEASE READ ABOVE

0
Posted 16 February 2010 at 01:46 as a comment on Pirates of Fortune

Permalink

Megrim is a sick card don't get me wrong my only reservation is this. Although Megrim might seem like the obvious choice in this deck it doesn't fit. A crucial part of this deck is to be able to cast everything as quickly as your picking up this would slow things down. I'm far better off casting 3 other things than one of these its as simple as that (bannerets make rogue cards cheaper so). I also feel Cover of Darkness is unneeded. Two reasons being 1 that most of my creatures are already evasive and 2 Although you might not see it just by the card list this deck has a major swarm factor so i'll still get damage through by sheer numbers. Nor does cover of darkness replace cloak and daggers function. The Blackguard and Fortune thief are worth protecting in my mind. Anyway thanks for the suggestions but those are my reasons

@EVERYONE ELSE

PLEASE NO MORE COMMENTS ABOUT MEGRIM. THANKS

0
Posted 02 February 2010 at 06:51 as a comment on Pirates of Fortune

Permalink

Very well but i meant what happens when two players have prince of thralls out and a third player looses a permanent. Which of the two prince of thralls controllers gets the permanent of the other player?

0
Posted 02 February 2010 at 06:28 as a comment on Most annoying ping deck EVER

Permalink

Lol i like first of all i like the title. O my god i'd completely forgotten about Relentless Rats. I was about to comment about you having 30 but then i read it. that's insane. Well needless to say good deck. Must get a little boring to play though what? Pick up Relentless Rat. Cast Relentless Rat. Next turn. Pick up Relentless Rat. Cast Relentless Rat.....

PS please comment on my deck

0
Posted 01 February 2010 at 19:55 as a comment on relentles rats will kill your mother

Permalink

Looks like a great deck. Your planes walkers look very well protected by your other cards. 19 lands seems to work in your deck as your creatures are all mostly around 3 mana. Very tenacious too.

0
Posted 01 February 2010 at 18:59 as a comment on Rise from the Ashes

Permalink

Thanks for the suggestion. It would probably definitely make my deck more tenacious. I'll play test it and maybe replace it for cloak and dagger. Ive put it in the sideboard for now. It definitely has the advantage of protecting all my creatures not just one.

0
Posted 01 February 2010 at 18:41 as a comment on Pirates of Fortune

Permalink

Awesome Deck. Really awesome choice of cards. One thing though why didn't you choose argothian enchantress over veduran enchantress (maybe legality issue i guess). Life gaining in these kind of epic proportions would be difficult for any deck to deal with i think.

PS please comment on my deck. Thanks

0
Posted 01 February 2010 at 16:23 as a comment on Immortality.

Permalink

Nice Deck. Simple but not uneffective. Probably surprising how many decks would loose to this simple formula. Well balanced. Not to sure about wasting a spell just to untap Deep-Slumber Titan every time though.

PS please comment on my deck

0
Posted 01 February 2010 at 16:02 as a comment on Monsters

Permalink

Would love to play this deck on MTGO but not even signed up myself

0
Posted 01 February 2010 at 15:52 as a comment on March of the soldiers

Permalink

I'm Loving this deck. Really good once you have Knight-Captain of Eos out cause you can swarm attacking with everything without worry of them lashing back. I just love it. Chose cards with really good artwork too. Inspires me to make a soldier deck of my own. Catapult master is awesome too. One of me favorite decks.

PS Please comment on my deck

0
Posted 01 February 2010 at 15:31 as a comment on March of the soldiers

Permalink

First of all very well designed deck. I see you have the old horseshoe crab hermetic study thing going on. I feel every good deck needs some means of drawing cards which you've got in quicksilver dagger. I got a question for you. How does prince of thralls work in a three player when two people have it out and the third person loses a permanent? who gets control? anyways nice deck man

PS please comment on my deck

0
Posted 01 February 2010 at 15:08 as a comment on Most annoying ping deck EVER

Permalink

Nice deck. I always think that life gaining is one of the most powerful ways of influencing the game although i know some people don't think much of it. Also it can be surprising how many decks actually have trouble dealing with a deck heavy on fliers Surely there's something better than excommunicate though and 20 lands seems a bit sparse.

PS Please comment on my deck

0
Posted 01 February 2010 at 14:55 as a comment on Angelical Knights

Permalink

I did consider using megrim and i might add it. However, consider that for the most part(excluding noggin whacks) i have to deal combat damage to make them discard a card, my point being that stinkdrinker bandit gives +2/+1 for every creature that deals combat damage anyway. So i deal him plus 2 damage even when he has no cards plus Stinkdrinker bandit is rogue and therefore fits better. Still could add it though and have the noggin whacks do 4 damage a piece. I'll think it over. Thanks for your comment

0
Posted 01 February 2010 at 14:25 as a comment on Pirates of Fortune

Permalink

You could add that new Urge to Feed from worldwake

0
Posted 01 February 2010 at 12:20 as a comment on the vampire lestat

Permalink

101-120 of 126 items

First 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Last