Mcholypotato

0 Decks, 74 Comments, 20 Reputation

Yeah...I don't think you know how sacrifice and regenerate mechanics work.

How did this deck make it to the front page when it doesn't even work!?

1
Posted 15 November 2013 at 02:11 as a comment on Door to... Winning?

Permalink

I wouldn't run just 1 of's of some of the lands. You only have one win condition and if just a single land is destroyed you're completely fucked. I have a similar deck to this but guildgates aren't the only win condition. Even in this deck you could run 2 of every guildgate and not get fucked on mana, so I would drop two selesnya guildgates and up the others.

http://www.mtgvault.com/mcholypotato/decks/spectrum-of-defeat/

0
Posted 07 October 2013 at 19:19 as a comment on The End of the Maze

Permalink

I like the idea of this deck a lot, nice job.

1
Posted 27 September 2013 at 16:07 as a comment on Presto-Change-O!

Permalink

I like it, reminds me of my bird deck but they play slightly differently.

http://www.mtgvault.com/mcholypotato/decks/to-kill-a-mockingbird/

0
Posted 26 September 2013 at 21:09 as a comment on birds 2.0

Permalink

Blowfly is a field wiper, I'd personally take out Corrosive Mentor. You don't need all your creatures to have wither.

Here's my wither deck that just rocks face to give you an idea of where I'm coming from. http://www.mtgvault.com/mcholypotato/decks/wither-in-bloom/

1
Posted 10 September 2013 at 23:03 in reply to #396048 on Noclevername,justagooddeck

Permalink

I'd also add dark ritual, getting 6 swamps is rather hard with no draw mechanics, land fetch, or mana ramp. 11 of your cards cost 5+ mana

2
Posted 10 September 2013 at 20:17 as a comment on Noclevername,justagooddeck

Permalink

Scar or Virulent Wound would be a nice addition

1
Posted 10 September 2013 at 05:39 as a comment on Noclevername,justagooddeck

Permalink

What is this? You only fulfilled half the Scott Standards for deck quality requirements; you have the Vampire Nighthawks but no Dungeon Geists. I don't even know you anymore.

0
Posted 07 September 2013 at 00:24 as a comment on bladed death

Permalink

Or better yet, just go to deck search and type, [Zombie Infestation] [Treasure Hunt]

0
Posted 06 September 2013 at 20:34 in reply to #394960 on Did I just win?

Permalink

This deck and variations of it has been posted so many times on MTGVault

0
Posted 06 September 2013 at 16:12 as a comment on Did I just win?

Permalink

I think you have far too many merfolk to make this a viable deck even in casual.

0
Posted 03 September 2013 at 00:16 as a comment on Merfolk

Permalink

I'm aware of that, but using braid of fire for one card is a waste of a card slot

0
Posted 28 August 2013 at 21:11 in reply to #392525 on Burn More!

Permalink

Braid of Fire is a nice card but you can only use instants or abilities with it because mana pools drain between phases, so all those sorceries with X in them don't benefit from Braid of Fire at all.

0
Posted 28 August 2013 at 18:35 as a comment on Burn More!

Permalink

You should put your commander in the sideboard, makes it a lot easier to tell who the commander is. I mean right now it's obvious since you have like 18 cards, but when you get to 100 it will be too much to search for a commander without being annoyed.

0
Posted 25 August 2013 at 21:07 as a comment on Commander

Permalink

I would add Scrapyard Salvo

0
Posted 19 August 2013 at 01:02 as a comment on Slag Fiend

Permalink

Oh and Dark Ritual might be a good idea for solid black so you can get some of the fatties out sooner or drop Dusk Urchins, Necro, or blowfly on turn 1.

0
Posted 31 July 2013 at 16:53 in reply to #384653 on What's Wrong With Wither?

Permalink

Looks alright; I'd drop some cards and put in Scar or Virulent Wound, those cards are pretty mean.

Have a look at my wither for some ideas.
http://www.mtgvault.com/mcholypotato/decks/wither-in-bloom/

1
Posted 31 July 2013 at 06:58 as a comment on What's Wrong With Wither?

Permalink

eater of days

0
Posted 18 July 2013 at 06:28 as a comment on Torpor Orb

Permalink

no I understand, we play very different magic formats so I suppose it's just not what I'm used to. Your decks are largely standard and I don't even know what's good in standard anymore.

0
Posted 18 July 2013 at 01:34 in reply to #379225 on GeneralM_ Read the description

Permalink

-_- Those are some of the decks that I'm talking about.

1
Posted 18 July 2013 at 00:26 in reply to #379225 on GeneralM_ Read the description

Permalink

21-40 of 57 items