KingCurtis

I didn't see that Sanctum of all brings stuff from the graveyard.

Perhaps a Hall of Heliod's Generosity just for utility.

Maybe some Commune with the Gods to allow you to grab the right shrine in the early game.

Do you have a reason in mind for Ixalan Binding over Oblivion Ring or Journey to Nowhere?

I would also consider dropping an enchanted evening in favor of another Herald of the Pantheon.

I feel like I am obligated to recommend Aura Thief in any deck with Enchanted Evening in it.

I could do monument or privileged position as warchief isn't modern legal. I like Eldrazi Monument more, but I don't know that how I feel about the sacrifice component.

I made this deck for a friend and he enjoyed playing it.

Clockwork, you have a point. I have been on this site for a while now and I agree that the website needs to add another feature or something to really get players involved. I do also agree with what everyone else is saying about the declining amount of users. Although this is a long term problem that the website owners need to solve, we as users can make the best using what we have (See the last paragraph). In my experience with MTGVault I have found that players tend to view the critiques of others as a negative. It is important for people to remember that in most cases this is just friendly suggestions and that no one will make you alter your prized design (on the reverse side, keep the comments friendly and well-intended). Additionally, I can't say that over the years this site has always been full of life. Outside of select, well established, deck builders few people commented on decks outside of the occasional rarity. For most of my time here, it has been just posting decks for the amusement or benefit of the other users. I have come to learn not to rely on this site for answers to my questions and instead learned to seek them out on my own.

This does not have to be the case. If we can get everyone to work together, this website can be a great deck building tool. That being said, descriptions are important no only for other people to understand you decks, but also for you to understand what you were thinking 5+ years ago when you designed that Storm Crow tribal. I like many others am guilty of the lack of descriptions. I have begun to slowly add descriptions for my decks, but like many of the veteran users I have a long list ahead of me.

Overall, my advice to users would be to fully fill out all the information possible when building your deck. Properly cite original deck designs that gave you inspiration, so that their deck gets some attention as well. Comment and/or like these inspirational decks yourself. Like the decks that inspire you or those whose design you can't help but appreciate. Finally, always upvote those trying to help you. Even if you don't take their advice they took time out of their day to try and improve your design, it's the least you can do for them. Also engage with those that leave a remark about your decks, it makes people feel be better about commenting.

Astrolabe is nice, but I like the option of being able to return a potentially threatening creature to my opponents hand. Plus I find most players can get regular lands for almost nothing, but Snow-covered lands can be a small investment (see why this matters later in this monologue). As for Master of Etherium, I agree that that card seriously benefits from being in this deck. He was left out purely because the cost puts the deck over $40 (What I define as budget. Something you wouldn't know because I am about 200 decks behind on writing descriptions).However, I did add him to the sideboard for future viewers to see. Finally you comment did persuade me into adding Cranial Plating. I had been debating on adding it and you made me realize that it doesn't cost much and there is really no reason not to add it.

Sadly, I cant say that I've play-tested this deck. However I have run through the Sample Hand tab multiple times and it seems to aggressively take out the opponents life; rather quickly for what I consider a budget deck.

I did forget about skewer. It's a great budget burn spell

I don't have answers to those decks. Any ideas?

Hahaha. Same!

Honestly, I am content with 52 card pick up. This deck was designed around The Wanderer and because he/she/it only has one real ability I just went off that. Any ideas on working around this planeswalkers abilities?

While this deck has changed a lot since I first put it up (it was my first deck on this site!) I still like this little combo, unreliable as it may be.

I would suggest removing a Krenko, Mob Boss, the set of TukTuk the Explorer and all the Horlding Outburst in favor of two Ib Halfheart, Goblin Tactician, four Quest for the Goblin Lord and another Dragon Fodder. I think these changes will give your horde of goblins the power to be really threatening.

I was just thinking of making a bear tribal!

I like it, but in trying to keep the mana curve down slopping I don't know what I would remove. Maybe the Polyraptors?

Currently its under Rile

I agree, something I would also add would be a set of Cranial Plating so that your Etched Champion can hit hard

Tron lands are the three "Urza" lands. These include Urza's Mine, Urza's Tower, and Urza's Power Plant. Together the lands can produce up to seven colorless mana when on the field together.