Discussion Forum

Reverse Deck Challenge

Instead of me posting a deck idea for you guys to build, here's the idea: you post the decks on here that you would like tweaked and adjusted by others the most, and the challenge is for them to find a way to help make your deck better.

Rules of the challenge:

-Post only your top three decks to be tweaked.
-If you post a deck, you agree to do your best to help other's.
Posted 24 June 2011 at 10:00

Permalink

I'm a heavy casual player, and I've kept trying to make my first red deck out of my favorite card in the color, Confusion in the ranks. unfortunately, this has not been easy for me, but i've finally came up with a skeleton that i like. the problem is that it's not the fastest or most consistent deck that i think it could be. help would be fantastic because i really want to buy the final product.

Deck link: http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=200808
0
Posted 24 June 2011 at 13:17

Permalink

Sounds cool. Been looking for some help on these two decks I'm planning on taking to tournaments. The first is one I've never even playtested yet, but that I have the most hope for. It's an extremely quick UG Infect deck that is also highly consistent thanks to unblockable creatures and control. The second is my many-times playtested BG Infect deck that is so far undefeated in local tournies. Only problem is consistency and its openness to control. Any and all help would be appreciated very much :)
0
Posted 24 June 2011 at 22:02

Permalink

I forgot the links O_o

Here they are:
G/U Infect + Proliferate - http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=200827
B/G Infect - http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=200187
0
Posted 24 June 2011 at 22:03

Permalink

never mind here....
0
Posted 25 June 2011 at 01:23

Permalink

[QUOTE=heliosofcows]never mind here....[/QUOTE]

I commented on your deck twice dude. Sorry for trying to help apparently O_o
0
Posted 25 June 2011 at 14:17

Permalink

[QUOTE=SpippyTheInsane]I commented on your deck twice dude. Sorry for trying to help apparently O_o[/QUOTE]


sorry for the misunderstanding. when i said never mind here, it was because you can't delete your own posts and my second post was stupid in my opinion, thus the never mind here (as in ignore this post (not my first, but my second)). it was originally a different comment but i relaced it with that as a place-holder.
0
Posted 25 June 2011 at 15:01

Permalink

I'm a casual player and i usually just play with the magic club at my university and i only have a few decks. they usually do pretty good, not perfect but never too many problems. ive taken some cards out from all of these decks but i really havent been able to come up with good replacements. so maybe you guys can give me some help by telling me what cards to put in. and i don't have that big of a budget so the cheaper the better :)

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=62927

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=173489
* Need help with mana base and any other suggestions

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=121280

Thanks Guys!
0
Posted 26 June 2011 at 06:08

Permalink

I wanted to see how well this was recieved before I posted my own decks on here, but these are the two I've just built that I'd really like to make better:

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=174386
-R/G based around Ulasht, all creatures being both red and green.

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=175368
-Wolf/Elf/Ally deck, I am really loving the way this one is playing, but would be happy to see it improved.

Thanks!
0
Posted 27 June 2011 at 00:15

Permalink

i was recently going through cards with tap/untap related abilities and came across wake thrasher. i decided to build a deck out of him and here it is. the only problem is that while this deck can be fast, it's not very consistant. suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

Deck link: http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=201744
0
Posted 27 June 2011 at 03:11

Permalink

Made this one a few weeks ago and have been tweaking it almost daily ever since. It's my version of a Control/Extraction deck and I'd really love some input on it.

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=197990
0
Posted 27 June 2011 at 03:58

Permalink

Sorry, I'm breaking the rules and want you to look at 4 of my decks. This seems like a great chance to have others look at my decks and help me with them.

Red/Black Aggro
http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=188269

Red/Black Land Destruction
http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=142616

Black Demon Tribal *Note- I do not own Imperial Seal*
http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=189920

Red/Black/White Earthbind ABU
http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=142479

Thank you :)
0
Posted 28 June 2011 at 22:14

Permalink

If by breaking the rules you mean that you're posting 4 then its fine. If by breaking the rules you mean "Look at my decks even though I wont look at any of yours." then no.
0
Posted 28 June 2011 at 23:01

Permalink

Don't worry. I looked at both of your infect decks and the wake thrasher deck. I liked the Wake deck. He is a great card which on many occacions slapped me around like a sissy. I was thinking of making a deck to battle infect AKA Leeches :p
0
Posted 28 June 2011 at 23:51

Permalink

I was actually looking at things to do with Wake Thrasher and stumpled upon a way to put an infinite amount of counters on any permanent you control that already has a counter on it (Planeswalkers, charge counters, +1/+1's, etc...)

Built a deck around the combo and would absolutely LOVE feedback and help making it more efficient. Thanks guys.

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=202573
0
Posted 29 June 2011 at 05:21

Permalink

This deck was terrific, I like the infinite counters part.
0
Posted 29 June 2011 at 23:04

Permalink

here is my final submission:

Deck link: http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=203111

i need help with the win condition
0
Posted 30 June 2011 at 17:46

Permalink

this is my REAL final submission:

Deck link: http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=203952

In terms of speed and consistency, it's not really that bad. the only problem is...
again, the win condition
0
Posted 03 July 2011 at 16:27

Permalink