Discussion Forum

Challenge:I win combo

Ok so here is a new deck challenge to abuse the platinum angel and shroud combo you can use any way to get shroud on it but it can't be reversed.Ex one that would work is the platinum angel and 2x greater auramancey combo but this deck must be :manab::manaw: and artifact. Try to make it as fast as possible and one more thing it has to be around $60-$70.Start working.:D
Posted 15 December 2010 at 01:20

Permalink

can it be :manab::manaw::manau:?
0
Posted 15 December 2010 at 02:20

Permalink

like this?
http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=125209
0
Posted 15 December 2010 at 02:42

Permalink

platinum angel and shroud is not a combo and doesn't let you win the game. It's just a stupid overcosted 4/4 flyer you gave shroud.
0
Posted 15 December 2010 at 07:43

Permalink

Screw :manaw::manab:

:manau::manar: is the way to go for Plat Angel abuse!
http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=125294
0
Posted 15 December 2010 at 09:03

Permalink

[QUOTE=SilverTabby]Screw :manaw::manab:

:manau::manar: is the way to go for Plat Angel abuse!
http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=125294[/QUOTE]

Tinker is restricted in vintage and banned in every other format man, you can't play 4.
0
Posted 15 December 2010 at 09:36

Permalink

Yea, I did that too. The only two rules I follow in deckmaking are the 4 of a kind rule and a "don't be a jerk" rule.
0
Posted 15 December 2010 at 15:47

Permalink

also, shroud protects from targeted removal but it does nothing to protect your angel from board wipes or forced sacrifices
0
Posted 15 December 2010 at 19:33

Permalink

[QUOTE=Seras]also, shroud protects from targeted removal but it does nothing to protect your angel from board wipes or forced sacrifices[/QUOTE]

or shooting it down in response to equip
0
Posted 15 December 2010 at 19:42

Permalink

For the love of god. You two really need to put down your $5,000 trade binders, get your heads out of your asses, and realize that (gasp :eek:) sometimes people build decks for fun.
0
Posted 15 December 2010 at 19:43

Permalink

[QUOTE=surewhynot]For the love of god. You two really need to put down your $5,000 trade binders, get your heads out of your asses, and realize that (gasp :eek:) sometimes people build decks for fun.[/QUOTE]

maybe you should keep your personal evaluations of who we are as players and people until you've been on the site for more than a month.

..and considering the two of us answer about 95% of ppl's questions on here, your attitude comes off as pretty ungrateful.
0
Posted 15 December 2010 at 19:50

Permalink

Ah, the good old "I've been here longer so I'm more important" line. Wonderful.

Answering "95%" of people's comments/questions does not make you a "hero" or someone worth celebrating. Let us also note that questions and comments can be answered without arrogance and a MASSIVE superiority complex, but instead with civility and humility. :D

Listen, there's parasites like you on every website. People who think, for whatever reason, they should be lorded over (Ask them how that works out. :D). While I find that endlessly entertaining, most other people find it annoying and monotonous, so my advice to you is to lighten up. You (and I) are really not that important...at all.
0
Posted 15 December 2010 at 20:02

Permalink

hum...what's your problem?

i did not state "I've been here longer so I'm more important" but rather asked that you get to us know a bit better before starting to insult us.

maybe you should take your own advice about "lightening up" considering you're the only one throwing around insults and personal attacks.
0
Posted 15 December 2010 at 20:09

Permalink

[QUOTE=Seras]hum...what's your problem?

i did not state "I've been here longer so I'm more important" but rather asked that you get to us know a bit better before starting to insult us.

maybe you should take your own advice about "lightening up" considering you're the only one throwing around insults and personal attacks.[/QUOTE]

Perhaps I could "get to know you guys", but current first-ish impressions are making that rather hard. The reason for my comment was that in this thread and in a few other threads I've seen recently, you both have come off as, well, arrogant.

And while there is the age-old rule of "don't judge a book by its cover", the reality is, everyone does, whether they mean to or not. So unless I'm greatly mistaken, and I'm willing to say I am, the current trend doesn't cast you in the best of lights.
0
Posted 15 December 2010 at 20:26

Permalink

i AGree, i really like making decks.
That is why my favorute tornement tipe is sealed deck or draft!
0
Posted 15 December 2010 at 20:56

Permalink

]people debating about a little bit of fun[/QUOTE]

=Review with Extreme Prejudice]Honestly, if you get 3 people together on the internet, they won't be able to agree on the color of the sky or whether eating broken glass is a good idea or not.[/QUOTE]
honestly most of my decks are for fun
]answer about 95% of ppl's questions on here[/QUOTE]
I try to answer more than 5% of the questions :(
0
Posted 16 December 2010 at 00:19

Permalink

Ok so its true a creature with shroud can be killed but its not like I said thats all there is, you can add cards and make it work thats the challenge. Next up this isnt a thread for for saying "Screw all other colors I like this." its a challenge work with it. Finally sorry to say I don't wan't any other colors, I pick for how uncommon it is to get a working deck... or at least a deck worth using.
0
Posted 16 December 2010 at 04:33

Permalink

This might work and it's a pretty cheap deck with Iona being the most expensive card at 6$. If Reanimate turns out to be expensive (I'm not sure, I thought it was cheap but it's a tournament card so...) exchange it for something like Animate Dead.


4 Exhume
4 Buried Alive
4 Dark Ritual
4 Phyrexian Arena
4 Sign in Blood
4 SmallPox
2 Reanimate

3 Vampire Nighthawk
4 Gatekeeper of Malakir
2 Platinum Angel
1 Iona, Shield of Emeria

1 Darksteel Axe
1 Lightning Greaves

4 Terramorphic Expanse
4 Evolving Wilds
14 Swamp
0
Posted 16 December 2010 at 08:09

Permalink