Discussion Forum

Deck Challenge: Obscene Mana

Hello again fellow deck builders! Today's deck challenge is another part of my series of "obscene" deck challenges.

This time your challenge is to design a deck that produces obscene amounts of mana *****WITHOUT CREATING INFINITE MANA*****

How much mana is obscene? Enough that you can pay for everyone else's turns in a 6 person multiplayer, and still have a bunch of mana left over.
Posted 01 December 2010 at 03:22

Permalink

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=120859

Old and everybody knows it produces enough mana, thought is not obscene

might produce in one turn (turn 3 or 4)+80mana more than enough to win
0
Posted 01 December 2010 at 08:31

Permalink

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=120864

Does this need 100 lands? no.
Does it want 100 lands? yes.
Did the original concept involve 900 lands? very yes.

Is this begging for land fall? yes.
Am I too lazy to add land fall? yes.
0
Posted 01 December 2010 at 09:13

Permalink

I can't remember the exact formula, but had an elf deck here once, and it made 1000 mana on each individual turn. It was the greatest example I had come up with for why mana burn should have remained in existence.
0
Posted 01 December 2010 at 10:11

Permalink

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=101851

Basically, best way to generate mana:

Gemhide + Reflex Sliver = Instant any color

Wild Pair = Dropping even more slivers

Mana Echoes = colorless mana like crazy.

I've dropped 6 slivers on one turn before, with 4 already out, so that was 45 colorless mana from that, with one Mana Echoes.

I then killed my opponent in one hit with the two Roar of the Crowd I had drawn :D
0
Posted 02 December 2010 at 18:39

Permalink

I got this idea from wanting to do a deck for both the Obscene Mana and Obscene Tokens deck challenges, but forgot to post it, so here ot is:

Obscene Token Mana
http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=122395

Although this deck probably doesn't count as Obscene.
0
Posted 06 December 2010 at 11:56

Permalink