flipperlord

25 Decks, 39 Comments, 0 Reputation

I know that i need the aquitects will... i actually had them in there at one time, but i have difficulty figuring what to take out... i appreciate the advice though.

0
Posted 14 July 2011 at 02:29 in reply to #179959 on Merfolk-Counter

Permalink

Word of Worship is not that good. Y do you have it?

0
Posted 23 June 2011 at 01:57 as a comment on Stall and boost

Permalink

That is a solid card... I will certainly consider it's addition

0
Posted 21 June 2011 at 02:16 in reply to #173412 on Ping Deck

Permalink

idk. If you get the liquid metal coating in your hand or soon afterward, you'll be fine, but if you don't, alot of your cards are boarderline useless. you may want to invest in some tutors to search for the coating. Final Verdict: This version is better if you start with the coating, but much worse if you don't get it. if you want it to really work, get the tutors

0
Posted 26 May 2011 at 05:02 as a comment on Green/Black Destruction

Permalink

It's fine, but this deck doesn't really have much of a win condition. I also think white is a bit out of place here. Silence isn't really that great here because you want the opponent to play spells; if you need white, make it your win condition.

0
Posted 25 May 2011 at 21:19 as a comment on Swerve To The Left

Permalink

the mox lets me have my hand on the field by turn 2. I think it will stay.

0
Posted 25 May 2011 at 21:15 in reply to #165716 on Artifact Attack

Permalink

this newer version is pretty weak in its number of creatures. You have just about as many enchantments as you do creatures, and since [assumingly] you want to do alot of attacking, you should probably downsize the enchantment number and up the creature number.

0
Posted 19 May 2011 at 01:24 as a comment on Rakdos Minions

Permalink

Why would I take out the sakura tribe elder? It's definitely better than diligent farmhand in this deck, and I already have a turn 1 suspend land fetch card. I will consider Belbe's portal as a replacement for Elvish Piper. The Piper is technically better, but the portal is immune to my boarch wipe effects

0
Posted 19 May 2011 at 00:45 in reply to #163875 on Praetor, New Phrexia

Permalink

hey thanks, i'll look at molten rain

0
Posted 22 April 2011 at 00:59 in reply to #155656 on Heavy Land Burn

Permalink

As of right now, I'm a Koth doubter in this deck lol. Please enlighten me.

0
Posted 21 April 2011 at 16:33 as a comment on T2 Tezz Grixis

Permalink

the deck seems ok.... the goblin outlander seems a bit out of place, but everything else seems to be fine. (you do know you can't use the slaughtermaster's activated ability right?)

fine deck... very offensive

0
Posted 21 April 2011 at 04:55 as a comment on Rakdos Minions

Permalink

ill think about the journals... thanks for the help :)

0
Posted 10 April 2011 at 05:00 in reply to #151347 on Exile

Permalink

"mtg starcity" on the internet gives the prices for all magic cards

0
Posted 06 March 2011 at 21:46 in reply to #138114 on Vampire-Creature Destruction

Permalink

it wasn't exactly cheap, but its not the worst either. I don't remember exactly, but i think it ran me about 80 bucks total. It's very effective at beating creature based decks, and what i really like about it is that, unlike most black creature kill decks, this one isn't weak against black.

0
Posted 05 March 2011 at 16:35 in reply to #138114 on Vampire-Creature Destruction

Permalink

wait im confused. Are you putting lust for war on your cinder pyromancers? cuz if you are then YOU take the 3 damage; lust for war is only for opposing creatures... im not saying you should take them out, but just so you dont misuse them

0
Posted 04 March 2011 at 16:33 as a comment on Mono Red-Aggressive Burn

Permalink

Love the zombies! I personally think you should put more of the zombie lords in and maybe one more good zombie, and then take out some of the other spells, and idk if you need three liliannas... maybe only two?

0
Posted 04 March 2011 at 16:27 as a comment on Destroy the Brain!

Permalink

eldrazi are ledgendary and they would both go to the graveyard if i made a copy of them

0
Posted 02 March 2011 at 12:01 in reply to #81262 on Eldrazi-Jund

Permalink

blightning?

0
Posted 21 February 2011 at 21:56 as a comment on Grixis

Permalink

manabarb's main purpose is to lock down an opponent. And how it locks them down is through damage. That's why its so great in burn decks.

0
Posted 11 February 2011 at 17:42 in reply to #126927 on Massive Burn

Permalink

y is blue my worst nightmare ? ... im more worried about red than blue... gae's herald is a good sideboard though

0
Posted 31 January 2011 at 00:05 in reply to #122838 on Aggression

Permalink

1-20 of 39 items

1 2 Last