arcanefighter

They did reprint terror, it was one of the remade cards, Doom Blade = Terror

Grapplehanger, that is some of the best advice ever, thank you for putting it out there: if you are going to actually build the deck keep it cheap. There tends to be a lot of snobbery towards people that build decks out of the cards they have which is why none of "my" decks are actual decks I own but are just ideas.

Are you lignifying your own creatures? If you have Doran down and lignify one of your opponents creatures you just made it a 4/4 relatively speaking. I would use Path to Exile or Doomblade for instant speed removal and Oblivion Ring or Pacifism for enchantment removal.

Dude, IDK what your talking about, that's a solid deck if its the one you actually learned to play from and it's standard legal. I'm assuming that you aren't making any changes to it but if you did I'd suggest replacing Lignify with path to exile or doomblade because with your Doran, the Siege Tower you would be making their creature a 4/4.

If you have time check out my Blazing Control Deck:
http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=27109

If your looking for something new to build try looking at the Lorwyn-Shadowmoor tribes, they always seem to provide plenty of options. Also, just try sifting through cards from the recent sets, I designed my last deck after reading Intimidation Bolt.

Thanks for input but I'm gonna try to keep the deck standard legal for now (I'll add that in the description) which rules out everything except Idyllic tutor and the stillmoon cavaliers. I won't use the stillmoon cavaliers because they have prot from black and white which makes it impossible to enchant them which is why I have the hags, they are not there to fight, there there to drop enchantments on. I use denial for combat. I'm not sure, I don't think Idyllic Tutor will do much to further my cause because I'm not going to search for a one mana enchantment.

I would suggest adding Sanguine Bond, Lifelink, and another Edge of Divinity. Sanguine Bond would be a really useful card in this deck because it makes it so when you gain life you opponent takes that much damage.

When I said cheap I meant how much it costs to buy the cards and this was only a first draft. I agree that Moonhold is to expensive and inefficient in this deck so I'm thinking about replacing them with 2 more Obsidian Battle-Axe, as for creature control, I think Crush Underfoot will work fine, I plan to add 2 more but with the Stinkdrinker Daredevils they will only cost one mana to play. Thanks for the input so far and let me know what you think when I update it.

Hmm, why do you have Mass Calcify in your sideboard and Wrath of God in your main deck, wouldn't it be better to wipe only your opponents creatures and not your own? Aside from that it looks good, I'd Throw in another Ajani Goldmane but thats just me.

Clarification of my above post: building an entire deck around one card. I think they need to add an edit post button.

I'm going to disagree with theenasty, building an entire deck is not a safe nor efficient strategy by any means, what you want is a deck that is built out of cards that complement several other cards in the deck so that way you are never restricted to one specific combo. Also, this strategy prevents you from getting hit with a thought hemorrhage and having your deck crippled in one blow. What you need is a theme and cards that fit well with that theme. I would take a look at some kithkin decks if I were you and then you should start to see how things fit and work together.

This deck looks quite simmilar to mine except I chose not to use Mossbridge Troll. If you have a wall of reverance throw in a retaliator griffin if you can, it your opponent will end up helping you pump your retaliator griffen up to trigger Mayael's Aria and the wall of reverance uses Retaliator Griffin to negate the damage. Check my deck out if you want:

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=20600

Yeah, I've added a Nemisis now, it is pretty sick and I'v only got to play it a couple of times so far. My favorite combo though is sigil tracer with mind funeral, it usaly gets about half of the deck.

Wow, this looks like a fun deck to play, constantly being able to wipe the field clean but having your creatures come back just fine. It would be real fun to play with this deck in a five person game, ill give it a thumbs up.

Dude, drop your artifact lands, if your far enough in the game that worldslayer wipes everything you have enough strength to finish it without lands, also, the kaldra set is a useless distraction, if you spend time trying to get that out your wasting mana that you could be using to build up to the finnish, the only way the kaldra set might be usefull is if you had more than one copy of each. If you drop the lands and the kaldra set you will have a much better chance at drawing the stuff you need to win.

If your interested in a really nice combo that I would recommend to almost any Naya deck and include in my own add a Retaliator Griffin or 2, that way if you can get a wall of reverence down at the same time as the griffin if you aren't 1 hit for 20 you nullify it next turn.

Thanks for the advice, I'll considering Murkfiend Liege if I ever try to gear this deck towards decking out multiple opponents at once but right now I think Merrow Commerce does the job.

I would advise adding 2 recross the paths, mabey in place of sprouts because with the average converted mana cost of that deck losing a clash would be hard. At the minimum I would throw in an overgrowth or two.

I'm not sure if your goal is to make a deck that uses the bringers or and indestructable artifact deck. I like the worldslayer-darksteel forge-mycosynth lattice combo but its to expensive, I would remove the artifact lands and add for of each of urza's lands. Also, you are focusing on to many things in the deck, if you cut the life gain (keep maby 1-2 Clearwater Goblets but remove everything else), remove the kaldra set, etc.. you should have a faster deck you will eliminate the clutter that slows you down and when you think, if the decks faster you wont need the lief gain that you got rid of.

I like this deck, it looks like it can stand up pretty well in casual play and its relatively simple so if you don't want to think it should be nice. Only thing I don't like is the cost of the mana base, for a deck as simple as this I would stick with basic lands for the most part.