Ankh

8 Decks, 76 Comments, 0 Reputation

Cho-Manno + Pariah = You should flog yourself for coming up with such an obvious combo.

0
Posted 23 July 2007 at 10:33 as a comment on

Permalink

This is a nice, focused, simple, cheap deck. I also like the lack of Wellwishers.

0
Posted 23 July 2007 at 06:44 as a comment on Sneaky Elves

Permalink

This deck lacks focus. I can see that it likes to destroy creatures. You'd be better off finding just a few cards that do that at a reasonable casting cost and adding four of each of them. Terror and Dark Banishing are two good ones. So are Reprisal and Swords to Plowshares.

From there try to avoid adding cards that you just think are cool. A really cool card may not actually be the best for your deck. Restrain yourself.

0
Posted 23 July 2007 at 06:42 as a comment on

Permalink

I went and actually put this deck together, and in the process I found some stuff that might work better. Here is what is actually in the deck now.

0
Posted 18 July 2007 at 23:20 as a comment on Donate Mirror

Permalink

It's catastrophe.

0
Posted 18 July 2007 at 08:09 as a comment on Catastrophe

Permalink

Why the Tresserhorn Sinks?

0
Posted 17 July 2007 at 19:46 as a comment on Millstone

Permalink

Where is your caps lock button? Find it and turn it off.

This deck wouldn't work in an actual game. The creatures are too expensive.

0
Posted 17 July 2007 at 19:44 as a comment on

Permalink

Tokens touch the graveyeard briefly before going out of play, so they do trigger effects that are triggered when creatures go to the graveyard.

0
Posted 14 July 2007 at 06:13 as a comment on infinite win

Permalink

It's infinite, not infinate.

0
Posted 13 July 2007 at 17:19 as a comment on infinite win

Permalink

That's a good idea. It would lessen the chance of my opponent deciding to switch their hand with the cards on the mirror.

0
Posted 12 July 2007 at 03:54 as a comment on Donate Mirror

Permalink

This is a deck made by Dr. Seuss. Cool.

0
Posted 10 July 2007 at 07:55 as a comment on Ebony And Ivory

Permalink

All direct damage, no imagination. Try building a real deck. It's a lot more fun to play against.

0
Posted 09 July 2007 at 20:32 as a comment on BURN

Permalink

I made decks like this when I first started playing magic. That was before I learned that there is more to the game than winning as quickly as possible. This deck is incredibly boring.

0
Posted 09 July 2007 at 20:30 as a comment on Cheese

Permalink

I like how simple it is. Put out creatures and make them bigger. Some mana acceleration might be a good idea though. Green is good for that.

0
Posted 07 July 2007 at 08:01 as a comment on Green Deck Test

Permalink

I didn't put in many creatures, but there is a lot of mana acceleration, mostly to keep Naked Singularity in play, which is there to stop people from doing things. The primary goal is to basically mill my opponent, and the secondary goal is to prevent him or her from hurting me. The ensnaring bridge/bottle cloyster combo is a bit cheap, but it works. The scepter is there in case my opponent somehow thwarts my attempt to donate the mirror to him or her.

0
Posted 07 July 2007 at 07:58 as a comment on Donate Mirror

Permalink

Having 4 lone wolves in the deck is ironic.

0
Posted 29 June 2007 at 18:22 as a comment on HAZUKA

Permalink

It's spelled variety.

0
Posted 23 June 2007 at 10:07 as a comment on black variety deck comment please

Permalink

This isn't a deck. It's not really even half a deck.

0
Posted 22 June 2007 at 19:34 as a comment on funfunfunfunfunfunfunfunfunfun

Permalink

I see the rituals now. I'm satisfied.

0
Posted 22 June 2007 at 19:32 as a comment on Black

Permalink

Oh yeah, and this deck is not a "highlander" deck. It is named after highlander in that it makes me immortal, at least as far as damage and loss of life goes.

0
Posted 22 June 2007 at 19:25 as a comment on The Highlander

Permalink

41-60 of 76 items