angus_02

106 Decks, 148 Comments, 13 Reputation

I like the suggestions, and yeah this isnt a normal deck.

1
Posted 20 June 2012 at 06:12 in reply to #266408 on BATTLE OF WITS

Permalink

I was actually thinking of removing red, leaving the kobolds (cuz they're free)

0
Posted 20 June 2012 at 05:43 in reply to #266408 on BATTLE OF WITS

Permalink

I haven't evem begun to think about the land base yet... right now i'm worrying about how the hell I'm going to get the cards I need when I need 'em.

0
Posted 20 June 2012 at 05:03 in reply to #266376 on BATTLE OF WITS

Permalink

I understand this is supposed to be a fun deck; but I'm sure you've realized by now that when your deck "poops on itself" (screws itself over) the game isn't fun. If you want to make this deck a lot better, read this:
Http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=346970

1
Posted 20 June 2012 at 04:22 as a comment on I can mill myself mum

Permalink

Sorry, one more, Vampire night hawk isn't in standard... yet.

1
Posted 19 June 2012 at 06:40 as a comment on Blood Sucking

Permalink

Also, Sorin's vengence is much too expensive and much too slow, i would greatly advise getting rid of it.

0
Posted 19 June 2012 at 06:38 in reply to #266005 on Blood Sucking

Permalink

If thT's how you want the deck to run, I would suggest more bloodlord of vaasgoth. Because that would enable you to drop 7/7 flying vamps. Also, when you're playing, don't sacrifuce a vamp you just created, instead I would suggest swinging them then sacrificing them. That way you can actually use them.

0
Posted 19 June 2012 at 06:36 as a comment on Blood Sucking

Permalink

You have arcane denial in here twicr.

0
Posted 07 June 2012 at 02:56 as a comment on Larceny

Permalink

Why only 47 cards?

0
Posted 07 June 2012 at 02:25 as a comment on jakira's slivers

Permalink

Feel free to share this explanation with other newbies. It will help them, and I won't have to see so many decks that are just a bunch of singletons.

0
Posted 07 June 2012 at 02:19 as a comment on How to make a decent deck.

Permalink

This deck will not be consistant at all; if you want to learn how tonmake a beeter deck read this:

Http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=346970

0
Posted 06 June 2012 at 23:31 as a comment on Dark Magic

Permalink

How are you possibly going to get the cards you need when there's only one in the entire deck? The consistancy of this deck is like that of steam. This deck is going to be hit or miss, and more often than not, you're going to lose and it won't even be close.
If you want to learn how to make a consistant deck read this:

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=346970

0
Posted 06 June 2012 at 22:59 as a comment on Blue Artifacts

Permalink

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=346970
Read it and your deck building will improve. For instance, this deck has WAY too many singletons in it.

0
Posted 06 June 2012 at 22:42 as a comment on andrew b/u/w

Permalink

May I suggest mind unboumd?

0
Posted 06 June 2012 at 22:38 as a comment on Archmage Ascension

Permalink

Not a bad combo! I like it, but not enough to change my deck.

0
Posted 06 June 2012 at 22:29 in reply to #262070 on squirrel culling

Permalink

Will they be in standard when M13 drops?

0
Posted 06 June 2012 at 22:27 as a comment on future Vamps

Permalink

Apocolypse chime

0
Posted 06 June 2012 at 10:31 as a comment on |-Worst Cards In MTG History-|

Permalink

If you want to learn how to make a decent deck, read this:
http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=346970

0
Posted 06 June 2012 at 10:13 as a comment on Power of the cat people

Permalink

Your mana curve is all kinds of janked, but it could work. I like the idea. Maybe only 3 of each titan, that way you don't get them instead of what you need?

0
Posted 06 June 2012 at 10:09 as a comment on ROFLstomp

Permalink

Your mana curve is all kinds of janked, but it could work. I like the idea.

0
Posted 06 June 2012 at 10:07 as a comment on ROFLstomp

Permalink

21-40 of 143 items

First 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Last