sick nasty deck

by dkdonuts1 on 24 November 2009

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (0 cards)

No sideboard found.

The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

red and blue mix together to create stradegies that are very effective. red = choas, blue=control so u control chaos
this is NOT tornament quality!!!!!!

Deck Tags

  • Fun

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

0
Likes

This deck has been viewed 1,358 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

0320120

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for sick nasty deck

deck cool

0
Posted 24 November 2009 at 20:26

Permalink

There is too much going on in this deck at the same time. Just becuase some cards though might have the same abilities it is still pointless to add other cards-alike. Though this deck has a lack of consistancy i cannot give you a thumbs up, nor thumbs down. Please check out my deck!'

Ryusei's Revenge

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=34591

0
Posted 24 November 2009 at 21:52

Permalink

i'll try to take out some creatures and stuff like that

0
Posted 25 November 2009 at 07:41

Permalink

need more multiples of cards to make it more consistent. maybe also take out some lands. if you take out 3, your deck will be down to 60. 20-24 lands is usually a good amount. o and if you want to delete cards from your deck, click the x to the right of the card titles on the edit page. just mentioning that because you have some cards listed as 0.

0
Posted 27 November 2009 at 21:43

Permalink

yet another random pile of cards
why do people post these things

show us what you want to make of this , so people can help i mean this is senceless it's just a pil eof red and blue cards.

0
Posted 01 December 2009 at 04:17

Permalink