Sphinx-Pwn Wand

by Zanmor on 26 August 2010

Main Deck (60 cards)

Artifacts (4)


Enchantments (4)


Sideboard (0 cards)

No sideboard found.

The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

Second attempt at a decent Sphinx-Bone Wand Deck.
Still trying Braids to get it out earlier. This time with cascade spells. Comments and suggestions welcome.

Deck Tags

  • Combo

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

1
Like

This deck has been viewed 883 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

82012128

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Not Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Sphinx-Pwn Wand

This deck would be better if you could actually cascade into braids to get the bone wand out quicker. Plus there are sorcery and instant ones to trigger the wand and get more counters.

0
Posted 26 August 2010 at 18:35

Permalink

I don't see anything that can cascade into braids. Braids is a 4 cmc creature and all you cascade cards are 4 cmc. Cascade requires a card with a lower converted mana cost than the card with cascade.

0
Posted 26 August 2010 at 18:42

Permalink

Drakedew has deleted this comment.

Posted 26 August 2010 at 18:44

Permalink

I would recomend Bituminous Blast to cascade into braids and it's an instant

0
Posted 26 August 2010 at 18:44

Permalink

also there's Deny Reality which is a sorcery and enlisted wurm which is a 6 drop 5/5 wurm with cascade too.

0
Posted 26 August 2010 at 18:50

Permalink

Clockspinning is good for the wand.

0
Posted 26 August 2010 at 19:00

Permalink

You don't need to cascade into Braids, that wouldn't let you get the wand out any faster. Cascades are simply intended to get a free instant out there.

0
Posted 26 August 2010 at 19:48

Permalink

Kyocool has deleted this comment.

Posted 21 December 2010 at 12:15

Permalink