Simple vintage infinite mana.

by Zanekiller on 17 June 2009

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (0 cards)

No sideboard found.

The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

1st to at latest 4th turn kill, If you dont kill them by the 4th turn you either dont know how to play magic, Or your really unlucky.

Deck Tags

  • Combo

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

0
Likes

This deck has been viewed 1,281 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

033000

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Not Legal in Modern
  • Not Legal in Vintage
  • Not Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Simple vintage infinite mana.

ive always liked the 0 cost artifact and all the possibilities with them, but despite considering myself a reasonable magic player, i havent exactly figure out how you would win so quickly with the deck. please explain

0
Posted 17 June 2009 at 05:55

Permalink

With tinker, candeleabra and the dual lands, this deck is intended to get lots of artifacts in play and generate mana to tinker exchange / pay for Collosus. Izzet and Dimir power inf mana if needed.

This deck is vulnerable to artifact hate, but can still accomplish a lot in one turn with the right draw. A couple of mana drains might be a good addition to have some protection...

However, regardless of format, most casual still follows vintage restricted rules. Tinker and Tol Academy probably shouldn't have a set of each... aside from that, interesting deck!


0
Posted 17 June 2009 at 21:17

Permalink

The main point of the deck is to generate inf mana then deck the opponent with braineyser or skyscribing.

0
Posted 18 June 2009 at 01:20

Permalink

Does no one use the Monolith combo with Stroke of Genius anymore? I know its old, but its still good damn it!.

0
Posted 15 May 2010 at 18:17

Permalink