Type 2 Enchantress

by Zaknafeyn on 27 February 2013

Main Deck (61 cards)

Sideboard (0 cards)

No sideboard found.

The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

2
Likes

This deck has been viewed 786 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

191012110

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Type 2 Enchantress

for an enchantress deck, this is kinda... devoid of enchantresses... O.o? if you want a t2 enchantress deck you want to keep this to white and green, and maybe blue for some control. you will have tons of draw though, so having a way to keep from discarding would be good, perhaps a "no max hand" card, or something to cheat lots of cards in quickly?

0
Posted 27 February 2013 at 10:37

Permalink

Liliana keeps you hand in limit, so no worries about this. Also, U, W and G - main colors. B - only for draw/discard (Liliana and Connections), R - Assemble the Legion. I'm planning to play 4 Assemble (3 as side option) - it is perfect vs control decks.
Main issues of this deck - how to get life, because aggro decks and draw with Connections are painfull

0
Posted 27 February 2013 at 13:15

Permalink

perhaps you misunderstand me. when you say "enchantress deck" I think of cards like Argothian Enchantress, mesa enchantress, verduran enchantress, etc... which all have you draw a card when you cast an enchantment. if you have more than a single enchantress out at a time that is at least a 2 for 1 draw every time you play a spell, plus your actual draw... so that means that you are drawing at least 3 cards per turn. are you gonna be playing 3 cards per turn?

admittedly though I got my formats mixed up, and forgot that t2 is standard, not t1. my bad. :)
so... perhaps not an enchantress deck, but an enchant deck. if this was t1 or 1.5 then there are so many ways to make the deck more interesting. although wandering wolf would be great in here I think, particularly with the ethereal armor. :)

0
Posted 27 February 2013 at 15:28

Permalink

Sure, that was my mistake call deck "Enchantress" :) Unfortunately, we don't have cards like Mesa enchantress etc at Standart game type. So i tried to save that decks tech - a lot of draw. I should name deck "Enchantments affinity" - in case of sphere of safety and ethereal armor ;)

Wondering wolf thery nice here, but he haven't hexproof like invisivble stalker. Also, stalker could draw cards with curiosity without etherial armor.
I want to build deck without any creatures - at my place players use a lot of removal cards, like supreme verdict etc. At the moment i try to use only stalker but almost finalize idea without them - only with assemble the legion
Thanks for your ideas, mate! :)

0
Posted 27 February 2013 at 18:49

Permalink

If you are worried about removal, you might sideboard some counters or Nevermore since merciless eviction and parasalene are some real threats to you. also, random thought... if you wanted to be gutsy you could actually run parasalene yourself, and combo it with faith's reward. bomb yourself, and get everything back... and gain a TON of life. :) for 7 mana, and a confused opponent. last thought that I had was that you could throw in azor's elecutors and you could have a decent win con with it with the sphere of safetys and most of the deck being enchanments.

0
Posted 27 February 2013 at 19:32

Permalink

Please check new build and comment it - http://mtgvault.com/zaknafeyn/decks/enchatments-t2-v2/
Discussion with you is very interesting and usefull, thank you

0
Posted 27 February 2013 at 21:15

Permalink

Ok, commented on the new deck. :)

0
Posted 01 March 2013 at 00:08

Permalink