xreverie8

38 Decks, 123 Comments, 22 Reputation

Hey man, your Vampire deck looks pretty awesome. I just restyled mine and am looking for some constructive feedback.
The original version was received extremely well and I hope this new one will do the same.

http://www.mtgvault.com/xreverie8/decks/this-deck-sucks-20/

0
Posted 07 February 2014 at 13:44 as a comment on Death's Reap

Permalink

Be sure to check out the newest version of this deck and give feedback.

http://www.mtgvault.com/xreverie8/decks/this-deck-sucks-20/

Thanks a million

0
Posted 07 February 2014 at 05:39 as a comment on This Deck Sucks!

Permalink

Any suggestions are greatly appreciated. If you comment on this deck with some good constructive criticism, I will gladly comment and help with any of your decks.

0
Posted 07 February 2014 at 05:21 as a comment on This Deck Sucks! 2.0

Permalink

I would personally choose Bloodline Keeper. Sangromancer does fit the deck's synergy, but I think Bloodline Keeper's ability make it a much stronger deck.

1
Posted 31 January 2014 at 18:23 in reply to #433245 on Unholy Vampire Slaughter

Permalink

Also, Soul Stair Expedition. great card that I think fits with your deck's style

1
Posted 31 January 2014 at 18:16 in reply to #433170 on Unholy Vampire Slaughter

Permalink

Looks like you are getting some awesome feedback on this deck. Just to strengthen my suggestion for bloodghast, remember he is a vampire and can be affected by the other vampires abilities. you can attack constantly with him, there is no point in holding him back because he cant block, that sounds even more impressive when we can take into consideration he can be returning as a 4/3, or 6/4, or 8/5 depending on how many bloodline keepers and nocturnus you have on the field.

hell, in late game, he gains haste if the opponent is below 10 life. He could return and immediately swing for lethal damage!

I would choose bloodghast hands down because he creates some really big pressure for your opponent to deal with over, and over and over again. it gets even better if you have 2 or more of him on the field.

1
Posted 31 January 2014 at 18:15 in reply to #433170 on Unholy Vampire Slaughter

Permalink

This is a very different take on a Vampire Deck. Two thumbs up for being original.

My only suggestion is maybe replace Reassembling Skeleton with Bloodghast because he continues to come back from the graveyard with landfall and will also benefit from bloodline keeper and Vampire Nocturnus making him a returning threat, while the Skeleton is more or less a returning chump block.

here is my vamp deck.
http://www.mtgvault.com/xreverie8/decks/this-deck-sucks/

1
Posted 31 January 2014 at 12:59 as a comment on Unholy Vampire Slaughter

Permalink

Captivating Vampire is the only one I see who doesn't fit in here. All the other vamps have life link or deal some kind of direct damage to trigger your exquisite/sanguine combo. Maybe switch him out for 4 Kalasrtia Highborn?

Other than that, This deck look like a lot of fun! Captivating vampire is so good he doesn't really even need to fit the synergy of the deck lol.

Here is my Vampire deck, let me know what you think.
http://www.mtgvault.com/xreverie8/decks/this-deck-sucks/

0
Posted 29 January 2014 at 16:35 as a comment on A Vamps Life

Permalink

Suggestions are greatly appreciated.

0
Posted 27 January 2014 at 19:32 as a comment on Devotion to Slaughter

Permalink

Deck looks awesome. Maybe sideboard hexmage for when you play a deck where her ability is useful. I would replace her with gatekeeper of malikir. He would slow down your mana curve though, but has a pretty aggressive affect.

Check out my Vampire deck and let me know what you think. Our decks are pretty similar. But yours is a bit faster.
http://www.mtgvault.com/xreverie8/decks/this-deck-sucks/

0
Posted 26 January 2014 at 15:30 as a comment on Modern Vampire Aggro

Permalink

I like the way you think. =D
http://www.mtgvault.com/xreverie8/decks/anowons-toll/

0
Posted 26 January 2014 at 15:23 as a comment on AnowonEDHTribalVamps

Permalink

What mechanic are you focusing on?

0
Posted 24 January 2014 at 20:08 as a comment on Vampires

Permalink

yeah, this deck isn't fast at all but it is fun to play with. it is Midrange on a good day lol. But i had everything i needed for it and I just spent $15 to complete it, so $15 for a fun tribal deck.

I was thinking about some angelic walls

0
Posted 24 January 2014 at 16:21 in reply to #430587 on Angels

Permalink

I don't have very many of these cards, but it was an idea for something to build in the future. I have a soft spot for stompy decks. I think it would run relatively well, and built it around a very simple mechanic.

Play big eldrazis as fast as possible, and let them use their annihilator. then swing.

0
Posted 24 January 2014 at 16:16 in reply to #430583 on Gods don't die, they slumber.

Permalink

I might try to get some of the asceticism. might trade out predators rapport.
Thanks for the advice.

0
Posted 23 January 2014 at 20:58 in reply to #430536 on Hydras

Permalink

And, if primordial, kalonian, or corpsejack get any interaction, I often win the game with 100+ life using predator's rapport.

0
Posted 23 January 2014 at 20:38 in reply to #430536 on Hydras

Permalink

well the 2 drops in the mana curve is actually around 6 considering the hydras with X in the mana cost. It focuses on midgame monster drops that usually win the game with one turn when combined with rogues passage, mage slayer and Jarad.

Its always fun to make a hydra the exact size as someones life total, then second main phase sacrifice it with Jarad.

it takes about 3 to 4 turns to get the hydras in play at the size I'm happy with. Games usually don't last longer than 10 turns. And I can surprisingly pump out hydras at the same rate a lot of people can play removal.

0
Posted 23 January 2014 at 20:36 in reply to #430536 on Hydras

Permalink

Mainly Modern. Sometimes standard, but that isn't nearly as fun.

0
Posted 23 January 2014 at 16:15 in reply to #430344 on modern vampires

Permalink

I totally agree. My deck is more midrange and turns on around turn 4 5 and 6. After it turns on, it gets exponentially unmanageable for the opponent. By turn 5 or 6 your deck is probably at its peek.

You argue a good case for the red. Just not my taste is all =)
Keep up the good work, awesome deck.


0
Posted 23 January 2014 at 15:58 in reply to #430344 on modern vampires

Permalink

My personal opinion about Vampire decks, ditch the red. The only things involving red mana are stormkirk, falkenrath and terminate.
Bloodline keeper is one of my favorites. as well as Anowon the ruin sage. Also think about draw power to make sure the deck doesn't run slow. Sign in blood and read the bones.

Here is mine. I am 100% happy with mine and it runs like a beast.
http://www.mtgvault.com/xreverie8/decks/this-deck-sucks/

0
Posted 23 January 2014 at 05:57 as a comment on modern vampires

Permalink

41-60 of 104 items