Cascaded Fury

by WiKkEdClOwN on 22 February 2013

Main Deck (53 cards)

Sideboard (0 cards)

No sideboard found.

The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

I really love the mechanic "Cascade" and I wanted a deck that abuses it. I wanted a fun deck that at the same time could hold its own and win games. The deck also has 4x Shardless Agent, 1x Etherium Horn-Sorcerer, and 2x Illusory Angel.

How to Play

Your early game is spent mana ramping out your colors. Sylvan Ranger, Coiling Oracle, Farhaven Elf, and Evolving Wilds are essential for this purpose. Ideally, you want to have out 2 Forests, 2 Mountains, an Island, and a Plains and you can cast every card in your deck. The most expensive card (mana wise) is Etherium Horn Sorcerer, so you know that the first spell you run into cascading is coming into play. Blade Splicer, Illusory Angel, and Man-O-War give you extra creatures and removal options (also man-o-war can bounce your own cascade creatures for reuse). Speaking of which, Shardless Agent, Bloodbraid Elf, and Etherium Horn Sorcerer are your cascaders. Faerie Imposter, Kor Skyfisher, and Man-O-Wars can bring those cascaders back to your hand for more cascading! So with all these creatures, what's the win condition? Glad you asked. Furystoke Giant can turn your army into a one shot kill, and is abusable with the return back to hand effects. Revillark is useful for reanimating your lost creatures back into play, and also abusable with return back to hand effects. The one card that breaks the deck has to be Predatory Rampage. I've explored options with Overrun and Overwhelming Stampede, and found Overrun is too mana restrictive in a 4 color deck, and Overwhelming Stampede isn't as useful when the creatures don't get over 3-4 power. Predatory Rampage allows my army to not only get bigger, but also forces my opponent to block and lose all their creatures potentially, and if they don't, then your army gets through for lethal (if not after blocks are assigned anyway). Even if you lose some creatures, the deck can recover from losses very quickly. Try this deck out, and you'll have a fun time.

Deck Tags

  • Cascade
  • Zoo
  • 4-Color
  • Creature-Based

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

1
Like

This deck has been viewed 992 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

8100618

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Not Legal in Modern
  • Not Legal in Vintage
  • Not Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Cascaded Fury

I appreciate decks that cost under $50 and still have a theme. That being said, I am curious as to how often your casting a cascade spell and running into a man o war or kor sky fisher just to have the creature bounce itself back. I'm betting your not bouncing the cascade creature because then your in effect paying a higher casting cost for a creature. I take it that your deck is suppose to get a few creatures into play before playing the Rampage. Long story short, I would revise the deck so that your cascade spells are less likely to keep your own creatures off the board. good luck

0
Posted 22 February 2013 at 15:47

Permalink

Bouncing my own cascade creatures and/or utility creatures is the point. A cascade creature runs into another creature (2 for 1), I get an effect like Blade splicer, then if I run into a faerie imposter or kor skyfisher its not the end of the world, I'll bounce my creature and replay it to get its effect again. If worse comes to worse for the skyfisher, I can return a land to replay on a later turn. I've had 5-7 creatures in play frequently by turn 5 thanks to cascade and bouncing. I will bounce my cascade creature any chance I can get, because the deck is setup to have the cascades run into another creature. Bouncing your own creatures is not as much of a drawback as you would think.

0
Posted 22 February 2013 at 15:57

Permalink