The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...
Start typing a card name and use the auto-complete feature to quickly select the card you're trying to add. Enter a quantity and add that card to your sideboard!
Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.
Gideon Tribal
Based off the idea from Tolarian Community College
This deck has been viewed 6,400 times.
NOTE: Set by owner when deck was made.
Tolarian Community College? I'm so happy someone made a list of this
Permalink
lol! I was thinking the same thing. Though it might actually work as a deck! ;)
It actually makes me a little mad that this deck isn't totally trash >.<
seems legit
nice, someone did it.
You realize that the legend rule applies to every single Gideon cast, so you'll only have one out at a time right?
I thought it was only for the same named legendary permanent. For example you could have out Jeska, Warrior Adept and Phage the Untouchable out, or both different named Braids out (or in this case a Gideon of the Trials out with aGideon, Ally of Zendikar and or a Gideon, Martial Paragon out as well). When did this change?
The legendary rule's the same. This is the planeswalker rule, which is slight different, but has never changed (I think). You can't have two or more planeswalkers with the same type on the battlefield, under anyone's control
that hasn't changed..and i don think it will cause that would make any game non-injoyable
the updated legend rule states that two players can have the same legendary anything at the same time. planeswalkers are not legendary and follow a different rule, which states that a single player can only have one of any type at any given time. casting a second gideon results in you having to sacrifice one of them
so wait, that mean that if one player controls a Ajani, then another cast one would that result in one of them going into the graveyard?
No, the walker rule was updated with the legend rule, for reference look up top 8 gameplay of any of the major standard tournaments ...
so, then does that mean that arifact or enchantment from betrayers of kamigawa that says "the legend rule dont apply" would also apply to planeswalkers
...holy balls you are correct! I missed this!
oh damn......that's....this game just got screwed
Wait, why does it apply to planeswalkers? I thought we said they were different rules...
mirror gallery does not apply.
oh okay, i wasn't sure
It's called the "planeswalker uniqueness rule". Just to put the correct name out there.
Also, im not so salty about this deck anymore. Im going to put in some of the new 2cmc bounce target permanent and watch my opponent try and instant speed flash in a Gideon on negative life. Then call a judge and watch the tears flow.
thats too savange
"I cast Gideon of the Trials, he resolves, then I activate his-*taps 2 islands*"Cyclonic Rift"
Umm, He enters the battlefield, so you don't have priority, so the person still gets the emblem. Or are you insinuating that you're swinging for lethal on the same turn?
Priority or not, once Gideon leaves play your opponent would lose. He can resolve all he likes honestly. The issue is a player trying to rush the other player by speaking fast to try and keep his opponent from being able to respond at all, which is a form of cheating. You have to allow your opponent ample time to respond between resolving a permanent and then activating an ability on said permanent. Not doing so would likely result in a judge call on the permanent's controller, resulting in a warning to engage in fair speed of play for both parties. I've seen it happen, and it's not fun for either player. Take your time to play. Don't rush like person A in my previous comment, because that's not fair play.
what the fuk drakeranes, once again proving u dont know rules n shirt lol. go read how priority works before u pull shit out of ur ass like "one who speaks faster gets to resolve his card first" or whatever the fuck u meant by that. lmao.
You've clearly never played in a professional setting if that's what you think. It states in the judges handbook that each player has to provide the other with a fair amount of time to respond once an action has been completed, and that not doing so can cause you to incur a penalty. It's an actual thing for someone to rush the other player to try and make a game swing in your favor. Maybe if you spent less time being an impudent little "shirt" you'd have read the rules and known it yourself
since you couldn't bother googling how priority works with planeswalkers, or in general, i decided to google it for you.After a Planeswalker resolves, its controller receives priority.December 15, 2011 | krizriktrWhenever a spell or ability resolves, the active player receives priority. This matters greatly with regard to planeswalkers. This is because immediately after a planeswalker spell resolves, its controller can choose to use one of its abilities before any other player will get a chance to respond. If the cost to use the ability increases the number of loyalty counters on the planeswalker, then by the time another player receives priority, this planeswalker will have additional counters on it.For example, immediately after Liliana of the Veil resolves, she will have three loyalty counters on her. Her controller can then use Liliana’s first loyalty ability at that time. Doing so will take her up to four loyalty counters because the cost of adding a counter is paid as the ability is put on the stack. Even if an opponent had Incinerate in hand, it would not be able to deal enough damage to Liliana to cause her to go to the graveyard. This is because by the time this player can play the Incinerate, Liliana would have already four counters on her. Even if Liliana were killed with one of her abilities on the stack, that ability would still resolve normally because it exists independent of its source like all abilities do.:)
Comprehensive rules116.3b306.5d606.3I'm sorry but if you're going to use proof, don't copy and paste from a forum. Use the actual rulings if you want to show me that I'm wrong please. Yes you are correct, it was a misunderstanding on my part about activating a loyalty ability. My original point though still stands in that even if he resolves, the emblem won't mean jack if he leaves play
You should look at my deck. It's a standard legal cycling budget deck.Here's the linkhttp://www.mtgvault.com/jacksonfoohia/decks/standard-cycling-30-budget/
to be honest this deck is non competitive to me and it just needs to go...
oh, so you cant publish anything except competitive decks in vault now?
It's sad that as Ixalan rolled in with its planeswalker rule change, this deck rotated out (mostly).
That's why you say screw it and go modern. Better utility that way