i went for 1 wurm just because you pay 6 for 2 5/5 with trample, but its true that is hard to play it soon without mana ramp, and probably it wont be so important late game the way this deck is going. It's a great creature, no doubt of that. I think i'll try this to see what it needs, and in the meantime i'll build some sidedeck. thanks for your help, appreciated :D
Permalink
in a away the deck has a good mana curve, i need to test it to see if i rly need mana ramp or anything else.i think i'll go for 64 cards lolz
i dont work with counters so paralel lives would be better for this, yet i dont know if populate will be enough.
its a good point sir. i'll give you that and im convinced. ty :)
because that card says each player can target, if the opponent has something that can desroy or exile 1 it will work for all. and i'm trying to go around the creatures that put golems. thats why i took it, but if u can find a way to fit it in the deck im thankful :)
those cards are in the side deck but they are excluded from the entire deck. those are the results from filtering.with 4 rings i think i wont be needing mana ramp because there is a lot of uncolored mana on permanents. this is a deck only for fun obviously. but somehow i think it wont work out because its limited. i dont know what to do with it :S
i put them to work with the shaman ... but i think im gonna replace him with birds and put only 4 fecth. i agree, ty :)
i dont mind to sacrifice modern. the cost is high, but im planing to play without that kind of lands and the shaman. going to proxy it first either way to see if how it works and then i'll try to replace the expensive cards for cheaper ones and see if it's playable or not. ty for advice :)
http://www.mtgvault.com/toucas/decks/the-werewolf-2/
i tried one like that but extort didnt work very well like a winning condicion... so i reach this one: http://www.mtgvault.com/toucas/decks/bleh/ tell me your opinion ^^
well man.. i started a deck like that sometime ago and believe it wont work that way... i keep changing it till it came to this: http://www.mtgvault.com/toucas/decks/dredge-dredge-dredge/This works and has a high win racio. take some cards from here and see what u can build. check my other decks too and give me your opinion ^^
i started all this because of the myojins and i search for some combo to infinite mana of all colors. When i finaly got it i deleted 2 myojins and after what you said i think you're right. I can take the myojins out, they are good and interesting but not the best way to win a game. In the other hand white has some control and the enlightened tutor is the shit. x) i didnt go for blue because all the decks i built were blue, i rly like that color for obvious reasons, but there is no other way. If i want to win analising all kinds of decks i need to put blue to control and black to destruction. And the dark rituals too. i think i can let demonfire here. its a nice winning condicion. Other idea i had was to instead of blue put red and play with some rakdos. I have to find a away so nothing is missing. i apreciate you help, and i'm hoping in some feedback. Ty mate :)
nice one indeed. check out my decks, i have one U/B with discard too, but with hexmage/dark depths combo :D http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=409153
nice one, maybe 2 of them instead of "wall of denial". the way it was i was getting a lot of defense, maybe with that and more creatures i can win quicker. dont know if "sculping steel" would be a right choice here or not. i replaced leonin for more spellskite. i think it is better.
ca deck noob fds !!!