merfolk

by tony410 on 18 June 2008

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (15 cards)

Sorceries (3)


Instants (3)

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

A merfolk deck

Deck Tags

  • Control

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

0
Likes

This deck has been viewed 781 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

539000

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Not Legal in Modern
  • Not Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for merfolk

There is an infinite turn combo here you can use if you add wanderwine prophets. Also to make everything islands, try quicksilver fountain then when all but one land is an island, bounce it, everything stays islands.

0
Posted 18 June 2008 at 15:31

Permalink

i wold drop the familiar's ruse for 3 cryptic command, the 2 summon the school and either the 2 Aquatic's will or the 2 tideshaper for another ponder, another LOA, another island, and 1 more banneret. Also, the 3 spots where merrow harbinger is would be better use with something else, like some combination of venser/sower of tempation. I'd stay away from wanderwine prophets. A 4/4 for 6 mana is just too slow for T2. you have much better things to do with 6 free mana.

0
Posted 18 June 2008 at 17:24

Permalink

I agree with the cryptics, and the addition of more aquatic's wills but I don't think I'd drop the school and tideshaper can be a really great card cuz of its synergy with the lord of atlantis, also it can get you plains to play the school. Don't knock wanderwine, in my deck I drop them and I win, so I wouldn't say there are a ton of better things for 6 mana. Its a game turner, and even for 6 mana its not bad. I'm rather tired of people bashing it. Plus the bannerets help with the cost

0
Posted 18 June 2008 at 19:48

Permalink

The Bannerets really do. You may not heavily value them now, but wait. I have very rarely had to pay for the colorless part of any spell in a similar deck. I also agree that Cryptics will help. Remember that right now, decks like this in standard need to focus on playing too many threats, forcing your opponent to use up as much of his/her removal spells/counterspells as possible. After he/she is spent, you still need an attacker to kill with, but not a "kill spell."

0
Posted 18 June 2008 at 21:36

Permalink