Conspiracy X

by To9 on 23 June 2011

Main Deck (60 cards)

Instants (4)


Artifacts (4)


Enchantments (4)


Land (18)

Sideboard (0 cards)

No sideboard found.

The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

Here I wanted to utilize the red burst spells with X values. Especially with the two Shadowmoor pearls "Wort, the Raidmother" and "Rosheen Meanderer" to copy the spell and lessen its cost. I also have som goblins to protect a very slow deck and also something to sacrifice to Skirk Prospectors. Minds Stone is for card advantage and mana. Feedback is appreciated :)

Deck Tags

  • Burn

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

2
Likes

This deck has been viewed 1,597 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

400393

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Not Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Conspiracy X

You are aware that when you copy say for example a fireball for 5, the copy wont do anything because it copies the card and X=0?

0
Posted 23 June 2011 at 22:46

Permalink

/being such, i wouldnt bother with the wortmother. so i would take her and the dragon fodder out and put in geosurge and another rosheen meander

0
Posted 23 June 2011 at 22:49

Permalink

Yeah, I was a bit unsure about that, but then I read this on a forum post when I searched google:

"Casting a spell without paying its mana cost, like with Cascade, is not the same thing as copying a spell already on the stack, which is what Conspire does. When you cast a spell without paying its mana cost, you can't choose a value for X, so it's 0 by default, but when you copy a spell on the stack, you copy the value of X if applicable." Doesn't this mean that the Wortmother strategy is valid?

0
Posted 24 June 2011 at 00:15

Permalink

Huh, thats weird. I could have sworn that was the ruling. Oh well (: haha in that case, it looks just fine

0
Posted 24 June 2011 at 10:47

Permalink