Trample Stompy (Plz Comment)

by TheNightAngel on 05 January 2011

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (0 cards)

No sideboard found.

The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

A deck based on tramplers...i hope I got it correct for Stompy :D

Surewhynot, if your out there, please comment lol ^^

Please comment everyone else!

Deck Tags

  • Stompy

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

4
Likes

This deck has been viewed 1,716 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

0000104

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Trample Stompy (Plz Comment)

I would use 2 less khani hydras and put 2 more stompers in. overall really good green stomp deck

0
Posted 05 January 2011 at 22:10

Permalink

i like it, i don't know if it's stompy cause i just joined today, and i don't know all the deck types yet.

0
Posted 05 January 2011 at 22:15

Permalink

In all honesty I would get rid of the Vengevines, They're not that stompy and you need to build a deck around them. (Oh and they're like $35 a piece so go sell em cause IMO they're garbage) :D

0
Posted 05 January 2011 at 22:25

Permalink

I have to disagree with this. Vengvines are an amazing card that (with llanowar elves and arbor elves) will definetely see play from the graveyard and is definetely worth the spot.

0
Posted 06 January 2011 at 07:18

Permalink

Vengevine is very much so a Stompy card. And well worth their price (to an extent...I think they should be 25 bucks).

This isn't bad, but it is missing a few things and has too many of other things. This is actually a good thing since we can just swap them out for each other! =]

Right now, you have too many fat-stomps. And between Terra Stomper, Rampaging Baloths, and Primalcrux (not counting Khalni since you're running a Creature-stomp and this is totally fine to run 4 of in this case)...I'd choose Primalcrux. The way you'll end up with this deck's set-up, those Primalcrux's will be HUGE.

So, by taking out the other fat-stomps, you have 4 cards to replace. Well, 2 cards you're missing is either 2 Skullclamps or 2 Infiltration Lenses. Take your pick.

The last 2 I think should take the place as 2 more Companions, but there's a few other things you could do instead.

0
Posted 06 January 2011 at 03:25

Permalink

OK, so Terra Stomper (which gave me the idea for the deck because when i saw it i was like:

AN 8/8 WITH TRAMPLE AND CAN'T BE COUNTERED FOR 6?????????????)

and then the Rampaging Baloths are out. When I put the baloths in I wasn't sure it was even going to fit but I ran with it. The main thing is Primalcrux + Khalni Hydra. 12 attack with trample right there, plus the khalni hydra is 20 damage if nothing is blocked. Yah...its big.

I didn't notice I forgot infiltration lenses (after playing I have decided I prefer them over skullclamps in most situations) and definitely putting in 2.

And putting in companions, thanks for the feedback!

1
Posted 06 January 2011 at 07:17

Permalink

No problem dude. I'm always glad to help out. And yeah, this deck is as good as I've seen them for beefing up Primalcrux. You have just 10 mana maximum among all your permanents that ISN'T green. That's pretty impressive.

0
Posted 06 January 2011 at 12:20

Permalink

I prefer Joraga Treespeaker over either Arbor Elf or Llanowar. After the second turn, assuming you played one turn one, it produces two mana instead of just one.

0
Posted 26 January 2011 at 13:11

Permalink

If you can, Try and work Rancor into there. It's kind of staple. :/

0
Posted 21 March 2011 at 04:40

Permalink

It's a staple of of Pump-Stomps, not necessarily Croma-Stomps like this one.

0
Posted 22 March 2011 at 00:30

Permalink

I tried the same thing but in standard-format.. A LOT harder ><

0
Posted 30 November 2011 at 11:43

Permalink