Playing with Dolls

by TheBiggestNoob on 21 June 2012

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (0 cards)

No sideboard found.

The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

just thought of this, i think its rather clever

Deck Tags

  • Experimental

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

4
Likes

This deck has been viewed 1,361 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

41001810

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Playing with Dolls

Found it very creative and looks fun, only downside is getting 4 cards from a 60 card deck is very unlikely. Otherwise you will be playing a burn/control until you get the dolls out. Some tutors may help you in the task of getting the dolls out. Anyways thats just my opinion and congrats on your creativity

0
Posted 21 June 2012 at 09:23

Permalink

Looks awesome man, I love the Blasphemous Act/Doll combo!

Like Eduardo mentioned however, you could use something to look for the dolls with, maybe Switch the Think Twice out for Ponder or even Forbidden Alchemy?

Your Creativity has spawned and Idea of my own version of this, but right now I am working on a different project and I'd love some input on it if you find the time :)

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=351830

0
Posted 21 June 2012 at 09:45

Permalink

Stuffy Doll decks are always fun.
Check out my deck: http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=265093

0
Posted 21 June 2012 at 13:04

Permalink

Into the Maw of hell is also a good combo with Stuffy Doll. Not only do you atomize your oponent but it also destroys a land

0
Posted 21 June 2012 at 14:32

Permalink

Are you insistent on making this Standard? If not, there's a number of ideas I can suggest

0
Posted 21 June 2012 at 15:59

Permalink