Destruction of Worlds

by TezBlackheart on 14 March 2012

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (4 cards)

Sorceries (4)

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

A Hybrid of R/G/B to make a perfect harmony of PAIN!!!

Deck Tags

  • Land Destruction

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

1
Like

This deck has been viewed 1,476 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

00123224

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Not Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Destruction of Worlds

Crucible of Worlds

0
Posted 14 March 2012 at 06:21

Permalink

Not at $22 a pop... Legacy and now Modern are abusing that card.... Though it would be great for me, it doesn't work well enough. I don't mind losing land (Terra food). More the better. I need 4 land at the most. 3 just to get the vore out and then 4 to keep the spells pumping... more land=fodder for the ants.

0
Posted 14 March 2012 at 06:38

Permalink

I would like the suggest replacing some of your higher CMC Sorceries like Despoil or Wreak Havoc with Stone Rain, Seismic Spike, or Molten Rain, but having options instead of just destroying land is a good idea.

I wrote a comment on your Draw-Damage deck about this, but again, your deck is "expensive" because of the dual-lands. Like what I said before: if you have those cards and this is one of your actual decks, then don't take them out, but if you don't, don't include them. I wouldn't be very inclined to make this deck knowing it's going to burn a decent hole in my pocket for minor luxuries.

Although, Terravore is extremely necessary, and never even consider taking it out.

Lastly, since you're going to be using a lot of sorcery's, I might suggest Magnivore. For a Lhurgoyf, it's effective, but since it's red, it is hardly used (because most burn spells are instants), so it may spice the deck up a little.

Regardless, I like the deck in general. The path to victory is quite interesting, and... well, I just like it!

0
Posted 08 April 2012 at 04:52

Permalink

I like how you think... Mag might be very interesting to abuse... Definite Sideboard and a possible maindeck if I think changes is need to be made...

0
Posted 01 May 2012 at 02:35

Permalink

Sorry, I made an error. I meant to say "So never even consider taking it out" instead of "and never consider taking it out".

Just... a slight nitpick on my part <:P

0
Posted 08 April 2012 at 04:54

Permalink