SwimmingBird

8 Decks, 35 Comments, 2 Reputation

Will you please stop spamming other peoples' decks to get attention?

0
Posted 13 April 2012 at 04:11 in reply to #247143 on First Turn Win (3)

Permalink

If you'd bothered to read the comments, that same thing has been said about 3 times.

Doesn't even matter. What are the odds that someone is going to run a card like that? If anyone designed their deck to be 100% advantageous against one deck, it's going to win. That can be said about any deck with any sort of weakness, which is just about every deck, not just this one.

Sorry for getting defensive, but I don't go around commenting on burn decks saying "LOL WITCHBANE ORB DESTROYS THIS DECK"

0
Posted 13 April 2012 at 04:08 in reply to #246951 on Relentless Rats

Permalink

Correct, especially experimentally, it can vary endlessly. But yes, the odds are very high. Playing against a friend of mine, I successfully removed 14/15 of his 4/4 saprolings from combat using 2 lost in the woods.

0
Posted 11 April 2012 at 01:20 in reply to #246626 on Lost in the Woods

Permalink

I was being facetious. And this guy takes first turn win pretty seriously if my judgement is correct. Look at his decks.

0
Posted 11 April 2012 at 01:16 in reply to #246273 on First Turn Win (3)

Permalink

I also need anything useful i can cast for < 3 mana

0
Posted 09 April 2012 at 21:19 as a comment on Relentless Rats

Permalink

What do you guys think about adding blue? Maybe some cancels and Mind funeral + any card that brings others from the graveyard to the battlefield?

0
Posted 09 April 2012 at 21:08 as a comment on Relentless Rats

Permalink

...What?

0
Posted 09 April 2012 at 20:50 in reply to #243248 on Relentless Rats

Permalink

Wow, thank you for the suggestion. It's going to take me a little while to finally sit down and go through all of the cards suggested in the comments to finally propose an updated and more efficient deck.

Also, I took a silent vow to never use dark ritual. I personally think it takes much of the fun and strategy away from the game. After all, it was banned for a reason.

But the future update will definitely yield interesting results.

0
Posted 09 April 2012 at 20:31 in reply to #246227 on Relentless Rats

Permalink

It's not that people disagree with the strategy and combination this deck takes advantage of, its the simple matter of winning on the first turn. The odds simply just aren't reasonable. If this deck was renamed something other than "First Turn Win" it would actually be quite respectable.

0
Posted 09 April 2012 at 20:26 in reply to #246273 on First Turn Win (3)

Permalink

*accept

And they are not random probabilities. It's correct.

0
Posted 09 April 2012 at 20:23 in reply to #246252 on First Turn Win (3)

Permalink

I also never said your deck was simple, just throwing that out there.

0
Posted 09 April 2012 at 04:18 in reply to #246179 on Relentless Rats

Permalink

Maybe because the idea behind this deck was simple? I made it hoping it would spur some conversation, lo and behold, it did.

0
Posted 09 April 2012 at 04:17 in reply to #246179 on Relentless Rats

Permalink

Also, your math is completely off. You obviously don't understand how probability works. Let me explain.

First card drawn, you have a 4/60 chance of drawing Progenitus. Second card, 4/59. Third - 4/58. Fourth - 4/57. Fifth - 4/56. Sixth - 4/55. Seventh, assuming you drew one your sixth, 3/54. Add the last two draws given that you drew Progenitus both times, and you get a whopping 5.69%! Those are the HIGHEST POSSIBLE odds of you JUST drawing two Progenitus your opening hand. Imagine what the probability of getting ALL of the cards you need in your opening hand would be. This is why first turn win decks are retarted. But have fun!

0
Posted 08 April 2012 at 23:39 as a comment on First Turn Win (3)

Permalink

Just because everyone has done it, or even thought about it, doesn't mean people don't want to talk about it, make suggestions, and share ideas on how to make this deck work better.

It got top page because it's interesting, not because I'm a good deck builder.

0
Posted 08 April 2012 at 16:57 in reply to #243924 on Relentless Rats

Permalink

No need, steel of the godhead serves the same purpose much better.

0
Posted 08 April 2012 at 16:52 in reply to #97974 on Bant: Unblockable Rafiq + Finest Hour

Permalink

Didn't really take you much thought to make this deck, did it....

1
Posted 08 April 2012 at 16:48 as a comment on br vamps

Permalink

It's a very unstable combination.

0
Posted 08 April 2012 at 16:35 in reply to #242962 on Best deck eva!!!

Permalink

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=320323

I've actually spent some time making a deck around Lost in the Woods.

You have to remember that this ability stacks because it triggers twice. If you have 2 lost in the woods out, you draw 2 cards for every attacking creature. If one of them is a forest, it gets taken out of combat.

I honestly feel as though my deck has some consistency and legitimacy, so please feel free to check it out and criticize.

0
Posted 08 April 2012 at 16:33 as a comment on Best deck eva!!!

Permalink

I think you guys have also forgotten about meddling mage...

0
Posted 08 April 2012 at 16:19 as a comment on Relentless Rats

Permalink

No. Bant is a shard. Multicolored blue white green cards are bant.

0
Posted 10 October 2010 at 12:52 as a comment on better next level bant.

Permalink

1-20 of 35 items

1 2 Last