Tree-ted!

by surewhynot on 16 December 2010

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (15 cards)

Creatures (1)


Instants (8)

Enchantments (6)

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

A fast-paced Treefolk deck. I've played this deck a few times against some friends and it crushes them. It starts fast, and then goes overwhelmingly fast.

This deck is also a submission for the Christmas deck challenge. AND it has a story! After endless decades of their brethren being chopped down and strung with lights and decorations (how humiliating!), the Treefolk have had enough! Don't even think about trying to chop these guys down, they're pissed! =]

Deck Tags

  • Tribal

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

31
Likes

This deck has been viewed 9,876 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

602042

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Not Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Tree-ted!

I never thought I'd find treefolk menacing... I now regret this.

1
Posted 16 December 2010 at 19:36

Permalink

Haha yeah I know! Glad you like it man. I love how their massive toughnesses (and indestructibility) flavorfully work towards the fact that they won't/can't be chopped down.

0
Posted 16 December 2010 at 20:09

Permalink

Also, long time no see dude. Welcome back!

0
Posted 16 December 2010 at 20:10

Permalink

Made a small change of adding in Bramblewood Paragon, and damn is the difference scary. =]

0
Posted 16 December 2010 at 20:28

Permalink

EGADS BAT-MAN! I'm slightly staggered by how much power that adds to an already dangerous deck.

1
Posted 16 December 2010 at 21:45

Permalink

Hehehe I know it's insane! The only thing I wish I could add is a way to make them all have Vigilance. It would fit perfectly...a bunch of pissed-off trees that smash everything in their way and can't be toppled. Plus, the absurd toughness that they all have would make it damn near impossible for anything to get through...

I gotta think on this one...

1
Posted 16 December 2010 at 22:00

Permalink

There we go. Final touches have been made. Quest for Renewal is arguably a better form of Vigilance and Oran-Rief, the Vastwood with Bramblewood Paragon is even more absurd than it was before =P

0
Posted 16 December 2010 at 22:10

Permalink

gasp! only two dourbarks??

1
Posted 17 December 2010 at 01:28

Permalink

All I need to be honest. Less is more =]

0
Posted 17 December 2010 at 01:38

Permalink

Alright, I did some trials with 4 of them and you're right...It works better. Making the change =]

1
Posted 17 December 2010 at 23:41

Permalink

Why do you have indomitable ancients in here the only way you have of playing him is with the leafcrowned elder. i mean its both a good blocker scratch that GREAT blocker but it can only do damage when you have doran out. But yes this is an amazingly powerful treefolk deck that only my elves could stand up against- but other then that it is extremely powerful but not as powerful but if you want to see stupid powerful i know a guy whos played magic since its been out and has a deck that is almost impossible to beat it will get you always on turn 2 if not it will get you on turn 3.

0
Posted 17 December 2010 at 18:20

Permalink

and also this deck put you in 1st place

1
Posted 17 December 2010 at 18:20

Permalink

Sweet. Yeah I have them in there as blockers that can do ~some damage~ but then they actually become my main offensive forces once I get Doran out. Also, the way this deck works, I have never had a problem dumping out the exact treefolk I want at any given moment =]

0
Posted 17 December 2010 at 18:26

Permalink

i'd suggest murmoring bosk (not sure spelling) so that you can play your dorans and such if they get stuck in your hand. you can also search for them with the harbinger. i built a treefolk deck for my friend, and he has the bosks just for a playset of maelstrom pulses, and you'd be surprised how handy that bit of removal is.... also, joraga treespeaker fits well in treefolk. hope i helped.

1
Posted 18 December 2010 at 00:21

Permalink

Well damn, all this running around X-mas shopping has scrambled my noodle...I thought I put those in. Well, all the same, thanks for reminding me! =]

0
Posted 18 December 2010 at 00:25

Permalink

Ugh...NO MORE! Seriously!

0
Posted 18 December 2010 at 19:26

Permalink

Hey check out my updated verstion of my ping deck its called flaming demise

0
Posted 18 December 2010 at 20:13

Permalink

how do you play Doran?

0
Posted 18 December 2010 at 20:23

Permalink

looks like the only way to play doran is 2 murming bosk

0
Posted 18 December 2010 at 21:03

Permalink

Leaf-Crowned Elder allows me to spew out Treefolk like crazy, and Treefolk Harbinger allows me to abuse that ability even more. I get Doran out turn 3-4 consistently. The Bosk is in case I get one in my hand.

0
Posted 18 December 2010 at 22:26

Permalink

Top thinking to create a Treefolk deck - Check out Elf-ish has left the building

0
Posted 19 December 2010 at 05:54

Permalink

amazing treefolk deck id add weatherseed treefolk in place of indomitable ancients. please omment on my decks not a lot of people do i think there good but want some opinions.

0
Posted 19 December 2010 at 11:32

Permalink

Nah, as I said in a previous post, with Doran's ability the Indomitable Ancients go from my prime blockers to my powerhouse attackers.

0
Posted 19 December 2010 at 13:50

Permalink

awesome deck, i too like the treefolk idea not to many people use it, like SOLO i dont have many comments, if ya could check out a deck that would rock. keep up the good wurk!

0
Posted 19 December 2010 at 13:08

Permalink

Commented for all of you gents. Glad you like the deck. =]

0
Posted 19 December 2010 at 14:12

Permalink

biermann1 has deleted this comment.

Posted 19 December 2010 at 18:57

Permalink

is there a purpose i'm missing to the snow-covered forests (as opposed to regular forests)? or do you just have them there for fun. Because if there isn't, there are cards from ice-age that benefit from you having the snow -covered land. however it's a small detail and you should be fine. but you do have a consistantly really good deck. <(^^)> <(^^<) (>^^)> <(^^)>

0
Posted 19 December 2010 at 19:02

Permalink

Mostly just for fun, those Snow-covered Forests are among my favorite Forest art. The other reason is this deck was submitted for a christmas deck challenge. The actual deck is in green sleeves and does actually have those forests =P

0
Posted 19 December 2010 at 19:19

Permalink

wow - I can't believe that didn't come to me
Christmas Deck
Haha nice

0
Posted 19 December 2010 at 21:14

Permalink

Haha thanks. Hey btw, with your name...Sprechen Sie Deutsch? =]

0
Posted 19 December 2010 at 22:42

Permalink

no, my name just happends to be of that origin, Je parle un peu de francais but that's all

0
Posted 20 December 2010 at 16:44

Permalink

Just added Cream of the Crop in. Holy hell is that card abused when I have Leaf-Crown out, good lord.

0
Posted 20 December 2010 at 16:18

Permalink

this is faster but my deck has one + flying

0
Posted 20 December 2010 at 22:45

Permalink

True. I'll have to put Plummets and Gravity Wells into my sideboard. =]

0
Posted 20 December 2010 at 22:48

Permalink

awesome deck i tried a crack at treefolk once i like tribal decks. can u take a look at my newest vamp list?

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=126996

0
Posted 21 December 2010 at 23:33

Permalink

wow! never thought treefolk could get so ridiculous! i mean with timber protecter..... almost seems unfair lol !

0
Posted 22 December 2010 at 00:16

Permalink

Yeah, Treefolk are one of the "Hidden Gems" of magic I think. And there's no almost about it, it is completely unfair =P

0
Posted 22 December 2010 at 00:32

Permalink

How about the legandary one that is G/B hybrid, indestructable, whenever you deal damage put the top card of your libary into your had, lose life equal to power and gain equal to toughness? Sorry, cant remember name. Otherwise, a really good and mean deck.

0
Posted 22 December 2010 at 05:54

Permalink

Well I thought about him, but odd as it may sound, I don't want to be putting too many Treefolk in my hand. It's way easier to cheat them all in than to play them from my hand =P

0
Posted 22 December 2010 at 14:42

Permalink

saproling of colnifor is good, but just isnt needed in a treefolk deck. i've tried it in mine, and surprisingly it just slows it down.

0
Posted 22 December 2010 at 17:56

Permalink

Exactly. As for your below post, may I point out the fact that in nearly any green deck Overwhelming Stampede is a disgustingly powerful card. Still, I'm a man who cares about the flavor of his decks nearly as much as the quality. Treefolk simply do not stampede, end of story. =]

0
Posted 22 December 2010 at 19:48

Permalink

oh, and i forgot one thing: Overwhelming stampede. though treefolk tend not to have the highest toughness, you'd be surprised how amazing it is in treefolk. and it's just disgusting when combined with Dauntless durabark....... [laughs evilly].......

0
Posted 22 December 2010 at 17:59

Permalink

Nice deck

0
Posted 22 December 2010 at 20:25

Permalink

Quick question. Does Oran-Reif, Murmuring Bosk, and Gaea's Cradle all count as basic lands? If not that would make a lot of those land retrieving cards suck.

0
Posted 27 December 2010 at 11:59

Permalink

Just looked into it and here is a snippet copied from the rules "Other lands are non-basic and may produce other combinations or amounts of mana, or may have other abilities." So all of those land are not basic and therefore you cant search for them.

You may have known this already and maybe I am just misinterpreting why you put those land retrieving cards in. One interesting point that I found is that Murmuring Bosk counts as a forest and therefore Treefolk Harbinger could be used to retrieve it because it specifies forest on the card instead of basic land.

0
Posted 27 December 2010 at 12:25

Permalink

Yeah, I have 16 things that count as forests, and a maximum 12 that I could grab with Cultivate/Khalni Heart Expedition. Truth be told the mana ramping I get from them is just an added bonus to the main reason I use them -- deck thinning. Dumping out all those lands makes my chances of spewing out treefolk much higher. =]

0
Posted 27 December 2010 at 14:42

Permalink

May I make one recommendation? Take out the Khalni Heart Expeditions and replace them with Sylvan Scrying. That card says land, not basic land, which would allow you to grab your nonbasic lands. Could make this deck much better.

0
Posted 27 December 2010 at 16:02

Permalink

It's a good idea, but the effect of 2 lands on the field versus just one in my hand is more appealing to me. Still, I appreciate the suggestion =]

0
Posted 27 December 2010 at 16:37

Permalink

I have a question for you. If you have a Bramblewood Paragon in play and you use the oran-rief to put a +1/+1 counter on a non-warrior creature would Bramblewood Paragon still give that creature Trample? I noticed that Bramblewood Paragon didn't say anything about the origin of the +1/+1 counter.

0
Posted 27 December 2010 at 19:08

Permalink

Yes. And, better yet, Oran-Rief says "that came into play", not "that was played/cast". This means my Kinship effect with Leaf-crowned works with it. The synergy is freakin' fantastic! =]

0
Posted 27 December 2010 at 22:08

Permalink

ok mr Shurewhynot, im thinking of ripping off this deck and take it to a legacy game day at my local store, in a scale of 1-10 how important would you rate the Gaea's cradle? it seems like that is the only real budget killer in this deck.. :7

(as i've told you earlier, this is one of your (imo) best tribal decks)

0
Posted 12 February 2011 at 03:34

Permalink

It's not very important to have really. In almost every case it quickly becomes WAY more mana than you can even think of putting a use to. I have it in there because it can allow an occasional jump in speed, and because I have them, but they aren't critical by any means. =]

0
Posted 12 February 2011 at 14:04

Permalink

Im also thinking of taking this deck and making it my own XD!! Would you bother replacing the cradle or no? Also, your amazing at making decks, could you help me with a dragons deck? I posted a deck challenge, would love to have you take a look!

0
Posted 13 February 2011 at 17:55

Permalink

tgtony has deleted this comment.

Posted 13 February 2011 at 19:17

Permalink

cards have been ordered, without the cradle though... might add an extra bramblewood paragon in its place :)

0
Posted 14 February 2011 at 07:42

Permalink

Great deck

0
Posted 06 August 2011 at 04:34

Permalink

would this deck work well in modern format?

0
Posted 10 September 2011 at 00:12

Permalink

Is it possible to play this deck without Gaea's Cradle? it's too expensive for me. Is there anything i can use instead of it?

0
Posted 08 August 2013 at 16:38

Permalink

Yeah absolutely. Cradle just adds a hefty boost in the speed of the deck, but even running just forests in its place works, the deck is still plenty fast. I often find that when I play this and I get cradle out, I have TOO much mana available...so you absolutely don't NEED it, I just happen to own them so I just put them in.

As to things that could replace it...there really are no lands that match Cradle...that's why it's so damn expensive. If I were you, I'd just run forests in their place or a land that is just fun for you to use.

0
Posted 08 August 2013 at 21:25

Permalink

Would´ve been downright insane if "Tree of Redemption" was a Treefolk :-0
´Wizards, make the change !´

0
Posted 19 August 2013 at 18:14

Permalink

I know...It would have been great! There's some other creatures printed recently where I just look at them and think, "Why isn't this a treefolk?"

0
Posted 19 August 2013 at 18:57

Permalink