Stomp'd

by surewhynot on 15 November 2010

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (15 cards)

Creatures (1)


Instants (7)

Enchantments (4)


Land (3)

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

Stompy deck. As in, AN ACTUAL STOMPY. Oh, and it stomps alright. I personally love this deck and am surprised that I forgot to add it until now. Stompy decks are big, ugly, but they aren't afraid to get dirty to get the job done...and they do. Just remember -- No foils. =] Let me know what you all think!

If any of you want Stompy explained, just ask...seriously it's embarrassing to see so many decks wrongly called stompy.

My other Stompy decks:

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=116626 <---Standard-legal Stompy

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=124886 <---A more creature-based Stompy and the only one I have using Garruk.

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=118142 <---Old(er)-school Stompy with more emphasis on pumps.

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=122687 <---Stompy that abuses math tricks based on the number 3.

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=122864 <---Stompy with Vengevine in it. That Vengevine just keeps coming.

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=123634 <---Elf tribal Stompy. Idea came to me when I looked at Mul Daya Channelers

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=127787 <---Eldrazi-based Stompy.

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=128224 <---Metal-Stomp. Artifact heavy Stompy.

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=130917 <---Horde-Stomp. Token swarm based Stompy. The last Stompy I'll make for a VERY long time. =]

Deck Tags

  • Stompy

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

15
Likes

This deck has been viewed 7,737 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

000078

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Not Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Not Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Stomp'd

I love it, but again I warn you, the fetch lands are baaaad juju. Should probably side in an eldrazi in case of Mind Funeral.

1
Posted 16 November 2010 at 01:06

Permalink

Yeah, naturally. I actually haven't gotten around to making my sideboard for this and a few of my other decks. Any that are either empty or have a bunch of Cheatyface (which I do carry around in my deckbox) have unfinished sideboards.

0
Posted 16 November 2010 at 01:10

Permalink

I use Relentless Rats myself, though cheatyface is much more amusing.

1
Posted 16 November 2010 at 01:14

Permalink

You bet he is! When my opponent has to take a phone-call or goes to the bathroom, they often come back to a swarm of 15 2/2 flyers =]

1
Posted 16 November 2010 at 01:25

Permalink

Oh man, I'm beginning to think Khalni Hydra is a dark horse newcomer to the lovely world of Stompy. It's just such a sudden looming presence that your opponent is almost never prepared for. =]

0
Posted 03 December 2010 at 02:57

Permalink

Congratz to raggedjoe for entering the world of Stompy. Also thanks to him for putting an idea in my head for a new deck (which I will make later...too damn busy now =/ )

0
Posted 06 December 2010 at 18:48

Permalink

Apologies to Deathtyrant for pushing his deck off the top list, but damn am I happy to have a Stompy deck on Top Decks.

0
Posted 08 December 2010 at 00:07

Permalink

^^ I love how your last two comments pushed this deck onto the top decks list :)

1
Posted 08 December 2010 at 10:36

Permalink

Eh, the last one did I think. The deck kept getting liked...so I knew it would happen sooner or later, but the waiting was killing me. =P

0
Posted 08 December 2010 at 10:38

Permalink

={ my old-school stompy fell off the upcoming list

0
Posted 08 December 2010 at 17:15

Permalink

waith an all green deck u can run 4 of thos hydras

0
Posted 09 December 2010 at 00:59

Permalink

this is accually a great deck. you should look at my deck and tell me what you think. you could get ideas for this deck too.
http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=101456

0
Posted 09 December 2010 at 21:27

Permalink

what about sythe tiger instead of rouge elephant? -1 toughness but you get shroud

0
Posted 09 December 2010 at 21:32

Permalink

If it had "super-shroud" then I would in a heartbeat. However, since I also can't target it...not my preference. That said, some people probably wouldn't mind it, and it IS a stompy card =]

0
Posted 09 December 2010 at 22:11

Permalink

BrianWW has deleted this comment.

Posted 11 December 2010 at 17:07

Permalink

So, I'm new to deck names and stuff... What is "stompy" REALLY? :-)

0
Posted 11 December 2010 at 17:09

Permalink

Stompy means that you use mana to its perfect efficancy every turn. Wasted mana is "shameful". It's one of the reasons that stompy is so fast. Additionally, stompy is big and ugly for as low a cost as you can find. The modern day stompy staple creature is Leatherback Baloth. It has no abilities at all, but in my standard stompy it's on the field turn 2 as a 4/5. The first stompy staple was Rogue Elephant...a 3/3 for 1 green that made you sac. the land you used for it. As far as I know, this card is where stompy got its name. In a Simpsons episode, a "rogue elephant" named Stompy is terrorizing the town.

Stompy is obviously mono-green.

Stompy also almost never has anything that costs more that 4-5 mana. The exception to this is things that allow you to cheat them in, or VERY RARELY things that are like...6 mana but are very powerful in the deck. Again, this is rare and you need to be positive it's ok. Even then, only 2 of them could be allowed in. There's been some in the past, but the new best one in my opinion is Khalni Hydra.

Stompy usually has lots of crazy pumps. A stompy deck should be able to kill someone with it's "mana elf" if it wants to.

Stompy has some consequential card drawing. What this means is it forces the opponent to decide whether to get hit hard or give you card advantage. Old school stompy used Skull Clamp. Now that card is taken up by Infiltration Lens.

Now, to go back to the perfect mana effieciency thing. This doesn't just mean using every last bit of mana ever turn. It also means getting the most out of that mana. For example, in most cases a 2/2 or 2/3 for 3 is thought of as 1 or "1/2" wasted mana. Or a 1/1 for 2 is another 1 wasted mana.

So when you pay 3 mana for a 4/5 like Leatherback...well that's 3 mana "surplus" and none wasted.

0
Posted 11 December 2010 at 17:31

Permalink

Now, I've made the argument before (and am sort of making it again after seeing one dude's deck) that Naya (actual Naya, not just the colors associated.) could be loosely considered acceptable as Stompy despite being multicolored.

A prime example of this is Woolly Thoctar. He's essentially a backwards Leatherback Baloth.

Remember, this does not mean Naya is stompy. It simply means that some Naya-based decks could, in my opinion, be Stompy.

0
Posted 11 December 2010 at 17:37

Permalink

Got it! Thank you sir!

PS: Love the deck challenges you post. Very fun reading.

0
Posted 11 December 2010 at 22:54

Permalink

Thanks dude, I appreciate it. And I hope that my explanation helped you to understand stompy and maybe even make one of your own. =]

0
Posted 12 December 2010 at 00:13

Permalink

hey iv seen how many decks you have and i like alot of them, can you take a look at one of my decks and see what you think? http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=123847

0
Posted 13 December 2010 at 17:31

Permalink

I have a stompy deck of sorts its called what a load of baloths it actually trys to creat as many creatures as possible and swamps my opponent with creatures but many aspects of it fit your description of stompy, I've been very concious of mana curve I use mana elves and few cards cost over 4 those that do have a way of giving me more than one creature and so present excellent value for there mana cost, check it out if you will !,
I must say I like this one scute mob is a personal favourite ,well done

0
Posted 13 December 2010 at 17:47

Permalink

dtoutain has deleted this comment.

Posted 17 December 2010 at 09:29

Permalink

Ok, so I'm new to the Stompy concept. Would Kalonian Behemoth be considered Stompy? 7 mana, granted, but a 9/9 with shroud.

0
Posted 17 December 2010 at 15:58

Permalink

Yes, and no. Kalonian Behemoth is in a list of cards called "Fat-stompy". They're above the normal restrictions Stompy has on mana costs (max 4-5), but are undoubtedly Stompy in nature. These guys are sometimes still included in a Stompy if they work well enough and it's truly worth it to the player (but never more than 2 are added).

I have a deck called "Chunky", which is not really a stompy deck, but what I would make if "Fat-stomp" was a real Stompy sub-type.

0
Posted 17 December 2010 at 16:36

Permalink

hey surewhynot, i love the deck im a huge fan of skullclamp, i use it in my fungus decks. Idk if you play type 2, but would you be willing to check out my u/w control deck i play in standard? maybe give me some pointers, get second almost every week cant quite push for first

0
Posted 19 December 2010 at 13:02

Permalink

Why have two Arbor Elves and two Llanowar Elves? is this a strategy i dont know about. cause I'd figure 4 Llanowars would be safer on the off chance you lose your forest's

0
Posted 02 February 2011 at 15:53

Permalink

It's a way to protect against certain types of removal, etc. Things like Memoricide, Extirpate, Maelstrom Pulse, etc.

0
Posted 03 February 2011 at 00:07

Permalink

Why do you use Nature's Claim over Naturalize I would think you want your opponent dead ASAP

0
Posted 03 March 2011 at 20:09

Permalink

4 life is nothing to Stompy. One extra mana efficiency as well as one turn faster artifact/enchantment hate is much more powerful than you might think.

@ mcphattus, I'll give it a look =]

0
Posted 07 March 2011 at 22:40

Permalink

I hear that your the master of stompy's do you mind looking at mine and helping me out.

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=157901

0
Posted 07 March 2011 at 18:03

Permalink

I really love this deck. I basically stole it for my own. :) Although I'm not sure about the Rogue Elephants. I'm afraid it will slow the deck down too much and there's only 18 lands as it is. In mine I've put Kavu Predator because I play against a lot of white decks but I'm thinking of Elvish Herder for their awesome ability.

0
Posted 13 March 2011 at 20:00

Permalink

Unless you can do well with dropping a single land on your second turn, a 3/3 on turn one will give most people a heart attack. This guy doesn't just kill-swap with a Goblin Guide, it kills them! If you feel shakey about the 18 lands, then take out 2 of the 4 Overwhelming Stampedes and put in 2 more lands. Obviously, you need to be careful with Rogue Elephants, but once you get the "feel" for them, you'll see why this great deck style was named after them (sorta). Kavu Predator is an excellent Stompy creature, especially if lifegain is dominant in your meta. As for EH...I've heard arguments for and against him for use in Stompy. I think it really depends on the type of creatures you're running. With this deck...I don't really think he's needed. You have a TON of trample threat in this deck. =]

0
Posted 13 March 2011 at 22:17

Permalink

Well I'm definitely getting three to go in mine. Taking out some Overwhelming Stampedes would be taking the icing off the stompy cake, hah. I think this deck works like a beast and I very rarely lose with it. The only decks I've had trouble with is black decks with Blood Seekers. Thanks for replying! :)

0
Posted 18 March 2011 at 16:42

Permalink

nice deck check out mine I am new to magic so any help you can give would be great http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=176125

0
Posted 23 April 2011 at 15:41

Permalink

I am no stranger to Magic, but I am new at effective deck building. If you and your friends don't mind please check out my projects if you find the time. Here is my stompy contribution:
http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=180766

0
Posted 08 May 2011 at 03:46

Permalink