Standard Stompy.

by surewhynot on 16 November 2010

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (15 cards)

Creatures (1)


Instants (7)

Enchantments (4)


Land (3)

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

God I hate standard...That's why I decided to stomp all over it.


My other Stompy decks:

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=116250 <---My personal favorite Stompy

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=118142 <---Old(er)-school Stompy with more emphasis on pumps.

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=122687 <---Stompy that abuses math tricks based on the number 3.

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=122864 <---Stompy with Vengevine in it. That Vengevine just keeps coming.

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=123634 <---Elf tribal Stompy. Idea came to me when I looked at Mul Daya Channelers

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=124886 <---A more creature-based Stompy and the only one I have using Garruk.

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=127787 <---Eldrazi-based Stompy.

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=128224 <---Metal-Stomp. Artifact heavy Stompy.

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=130917 <---Horde-Stomp. Token swarm based Stompy. The last Stompy I'll make for a VERY long time. =]

Deck Tags

  • Stompy

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

11
Likes

This deck has been viewed 6,443 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

000068

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Standard Stompy.

WooHoo! I was worried I wouldn't be able to match the great number. 24/4/8/0/4/0/2! =]

0
Posted 16 November 2010 at 22:39

Permalink

I like the infiltration lens. nice touch. I don't know if the adventuring gear is worth it though.

1
Posted 19 November 2010 at 22:12

Permalink

The lens leads to some hilarious things, such as drawing into more pump-instants to dump into the trampler that it's equipped to. That said, the Adventuring Gear is absurd. It trashes people.

0
Posted 19 November 2010 at 22:48

Permalink

what about garruks packleader or garruk himself

1
Posted 05 December 2010 at 21:22

Permalink

Nah, both are too slow, the Packleader being the slower of the two obviously.

0
Posted 06 December 2010 at 00:54

Permalink

yer gessed as much just though i would ask packleader would give u some card draw mid and late game but i gess u dont want it to last that long

0
Posted 06 December 2010 at 09:59

Permalink

Yeah. More over it shouldn't last that long. Plus, Infiltration Lens is way better for card drawing.

0
Posted 06 December 2010 at 11:32

Permalink

Why have I never heard of Scute Mob??? I'm stealing this card for my green stompy deck. I dont see why you dont include Garruk... turn 4 play and untap two lands, turn 5 everyone gets +3/+3 and trample... thats what I call epic

1
Posted 06 December 2010 at 14:29

Permalink

I'm glad you like the Scute. It is really good. Now Garruk...You need to have him played to get 2 mana back. 4 mana for 2 mana and a possible (actually pretty likely) total bust? That's wasted mana right there. He's good, and sits snug on the edge of stompy/non-stompy...but in my opinion leans more towards non-stompy.

0
Posted 06 December 2010 at 14:53

Permalink

I like this deck... defiantly not too high costing for a green stompp deck and i love the Scute Mob in it. But what do you think about adding Explore to boost the power of landfall or adventure gear in this deck?

1
Posted 07 December 2010 at 22:14

Permalink

Eh, explore isn't very Stompy, neither is Cultivate. Harrow is amazing because it IS stompy and land acceleration. With those and the fetchlands, I have plenty of power behind that stuff. =]

0
Posted 07 December 2010 at 22:21

Permalink

These decks are amazing! i see that stompy revolves arround green alot...to be honest, this is the first time i've heard of it. but it's awesome, do you think you could build a good infect deck? i have one already but i dont think its that great....

0
Posted 18 December 2010 at 02:09

Permalink

Well, I was thinking of making an Infect Stompy if there are the cards for it in the upcoming sets. So far, I'm not satisfied enough.

1
Posted 18 December 2010 at 11:13

Permalink

You should.. i posted an infect deck for standard but it needs more to it. though it's good when me and my friends play every man for themself with 3 people, single play is kinda slow and 2 headed giant it blows.

0
Posted 18 December 2010 at 13:26

Permalink

Well like I said, if the next few sets offer some better options with green and infect, then I might try it. It's also a little bit complicated to figure out whether or not something has a Stompy-like efficiency with infect thrown into the equation.

I hope that the next set does end up with enough infect cards like that so that I CAN make an infect Stompy...that would be crazy. =]

0
Posted 18 December 2010 at 14:30

Permalink

Stompy seems sweet, lol, but in regards to the sideboard, why kozilek?

0
Posted 18 December 2010 at 16:13

Permalink

Mill decks. Stompy is obviously aggressive enough to usually tear these decks apart, but on the other side, the sort of reckless headstrong way of playing that Stompy has can make them vulnerable to those faster mill/control decks. With Kozilek in, they have next to no chance to win =]

0
Posted 18 December 2010 at 19:01

Permalink

ahhhh, makes sense! good thinking (:

0
Posted 19 December 2010 at 14:12

Permalink

ahhhh, makes sense! good thinking (:

0
Posted 19 December 2010 at 14:14

Permalink

so im building a somewhat similar deck just without the landfall element. Biggest problem is turn 4 wrath of god on me. I'm also deathly afraid of pyroclasm in turns 1-3. Also, you might consider nest invader. He's like basically a 2/2 for 1 mana with some added versatility. Finally, the only win condition i see is overwhelming stampede, garruk wildspeaker is a much more reliable and versatile option than that imo.

0
Posted 18 December 2010 at 18:02

Permalink

Overwhelming Stampede is overkill to be honest. Trust me with that one. Garruk is a weird dude to me...he can be argued to be both Stompy and non-Stompy, and both arguments make perfect sense. x_x

Nest invader is totally Stompy, no question about it. I've thought about using them before, but just never did. =/

0
Posted 18 December 2010 at 18:25

Permalink

oldschool has deleted this comment.

Posted 18 December 2010 at 21:20

Permalink

oldschool has deleted this comment.

Posted 18 December 2010 at 21:49

Permalink

Why nature's claim instead of naturalize?

0
Posted 18 December 2010 at 21:49

Permalink

Because that one mana can make a HUGE difference against control and/or prison decks. Plus, it's frickin' Stompy! Who cares if they gain 4 measly life?

0
Posted 18 December 2010 at 22:04

Permalink

this is great. the overwhelming stampeed goes good with it.
you should look at my stompy deck. here is the link.
http://mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=101456

0
Posted 19 December 2010 at 01:03

Permalink

I'm going to, for the most part, steal this deck lol, just to see how it stomps (no pun intended) my buddies. Gonna make some changes though. I personally prefer giant growth to groundswell. But other than that I think you can assume I like this deck :) surewhynot, I formally thank you for introducing me to stompy :) it's a sexy concept that suits my personality.

0
Posted 22 December 2010 at 00:16

Permalink

Hehehe, you're very welcome. As I've said before, one of the best compliments I can get is someone saying they're going to blatantly rip off my deck =]

And trust me, your friends will **** themselves. =P

0
Posted 22 December 2010 at 00:52

Permalink

I have a question: you obviously put a lot of thought behind your decks, so I want to know what the reasoning is behind not putting in Birds of Paradise. Considering that it's flying, in combination with Groundswell / Primal Bellow / Overwhelming Stampede, it would seem to me that it's worth not having the 1 power for 1 mana golden rule stompy decks tend to employ in this particular instance, no?

0
Posted 18 January 2011 at 23:06

Permalink

To be perfectly honest, because I flat-out forgot to use them XD

Thanks for the reminder, and yes...in a case where it's a mana producer and provides flight defense/aggression, the loss of power is acceptable.

0
Posted 19 January 2011 at 12:14

Permalink

caflori99 has deleted this comment.

Posted 18 January 2011 at 23:09

Permalink

Nice deck man, I played Stompy years ago when Pouncing Jags, Albino Trolls and Overrun were in their hay day. Just getting back into MTG I decided to throw this deck together from the "affordable" factor. I grabbed all but 1 card for just under 40 bucks, that one card being Verdant Catacombs, do you have a good substitution for this card? Just getting back into the swing I'm not really interested in spending 10-15 bucks each for 4 of these, doubling the price of the deck overall. Thanks.

0
Posted 29 May 2011 at 21:38

Permalink

To be perfectly honest, the deck will run just fine without them. They only increase the speed of the by a small margin, but since I already had some, it was an obvious choice for me. Really, if you want to save cash, they aren't necessary at all.

0
Posted 30 May 2011 at 04:30

Permalink

Yeah, that is what I figured. I just threw in 4 more Forests for now. Thanks man.

0
Posted 30 May 2011 at 16:18

Permalink

Nice Deck..Summon trap ? If you have a chance check out my thopter deck it needs help !

0
Posted 02 August 2011 at 01:59

Permalink