Seeing Double

by surewhynot on 23 June 2011

Main Deck (60 cards)

Artifacts (3)


Enchantments (6)


Land (22)

Sideboard (0 cards)

No sideboard found.

The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

I've wanted to make a deck like this for a while now, and with Phyrexian Metamorph, I finally decided to make it -- A copy deck!

Deck Tags

  • Fun

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

19
Likes

This deck has been viewed 13,049 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

045000

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Seeing Double

sure i got a question, its not bout this deck but i makin a blue/white infect deck and im still undecided is paying 2 life worth giving your opponent 3 or 4 infect(creature is unblockable)

0
Posted 24 June 2011 at 01:25

Permalink

I'm going to assume your referring to mutagenic growth. In my unexpert opinion I would say it is worth it because they need to deal 20 damage to you while you only need ten and infect decks are supposed to be fast anyways.

And nice deck idea here :P

0
Posted 24 June 2011 at 01:52

Permalink

kk thank you metal i forgot how to post on the forum and i figured sure would be a good judge, and if not people will read his page cuz he is surewhynot

1
Posted 24 June 2011 at 02:13

Permalink

Paying life, if it means it will make you win, is always good. This is something that separates Legacy players from Standard players more than the available card-base IMHO. A Legacy player isn't afraid to kill themselves if it means their opponent is killed first. Take the card Dismember for example. A lot of Standard players think it's not that good, a lot of Legacy players think it's amazing.

0
Posted 24 June 2011 at 03:41

Permalink

here is link to my blue/white infect. incase you want to see it
http://www.mtgdeckbuilder.net/Decks/ViewDeck/103912

0
Posted 24 June 2011 at 02:14

Permalink

Just took a look at the deck, very nice. I would suggest Tempered Steel if you can find a good place for it =]

0
Posted 24 June 2011 at 03:50

Permalink

omg this looks like so much fun. i can not wait to see what funny things happen with this deck! :D

0
Posted 24 June 2011 at 04:34

Permalink

Great bulid love the idea. Im trying to build sumthin similar but with tokens and its blue white i never thought about followed footsteps tho.

0
Posted 25 June 2011 at 14:26

Permalink

hey sure.....i wanted to ask this question before, but i know youll look at the comments of this deck, also btw, amazing deck as always, you always know the right mix of messing with someone and shitting on them at the same time.

ive looked all over, you seem to be the Stompy deck champion of the ages, and i really really love the idea behind it, what is the TRUE definition of stompy? i have a very good idea, but i dont want to make a stompy deck just to have its stompy-ness disproved by others....weird as this request sounds, id really love to hear the answer

0
Posted 26 June 2011 at 01:02

Permalink

I consider myself very good at making Stompy decks, but I actually learned from my buddy DoTheWumpus. I'd be happy to help, but you should ask him too.

The true definition of Stompy is mana efficiency perfected. The idea is to get the absolute most out of the littlest amount. For example, a 2/2 for 3 mana is inefficient. Both its power and toughness are 1 lower than its mana cost, and thus it is 2 'wasted mana'. Now think of Rogue Elephant, the card that gave Stompy its name. A 3/3 for 1 mana and you have to sacrifice a land. That's 6 total between the power and toughness for just 1 mana! Or...5 'surplus mana' yes, you have to sacrifice a land, but the original Stompy deck was so insanely efficient that it only needed to use 10 lands. These decks are now called 10L Stompys.

Anyway, that's the idea of Stompy. Supreme efficiency in every way. So...a word of advice is to have some means of card drawing that is of course efficient. This is because with all that efficiency, these decks can't even really keep up with themselves!

1
Posted 26 June 2011 at 01:48

Permalink

@_@ Flusterstorm... I want a playset...

This is a pretty awesome deck, and incredibly unique

0
Posted 27 June 2011 at 00:49

Permalink

You don't even know dude. I'm strongly considering using them over Spell Pierce in my Extractions. It's that good. Oh, and it just craps all over Storm decks =D

0
Posted 27 June 2011 at 01:42

Permalink

I think it definitely takes the place of Spell Pierce in eternal formats. It doubles as an anti-storm tool, and functions in the general pace of a game better than Spell Pierce usually.

I am seriously expecting another false shift like with Misstep though, it'll just deal with a few decks, but it will leave the door open for a lot of shiny new jank builds.

0
Posted 27 June 2011 at 02:32

Permalink

I love jank builds! They're the most fun for an Extractor =]

0
Posted 27 June 2011 at 04:27

Permalink

Problem with my jank is that it all winds up ending it's arguments by saying 'and I play nether void', which while a good way to get people to scoop, isn't really a problem for your decks since you can just deal with my ghasts.

I have been looking for some sort of nice recursive beater that can go alongside them, but really they'd all wind up an even greater liability. :|

0
Posted 27 June 2011 at 04:33

Permalink

Yeah...that's why Extraction is so good against Reanimator...your decks basically work by putting yourselves in our crosshairs =P

0
Posted 27 June 2011 at 04:38

Permalink

but when we win against y'all, it's just that much sweeter. Shame it barely ever happens...

0
Posted 27 June 2011 at 04:41

Permalink

I love Phyrexian Metamorph even more than I love Mimic Vat. Both in the same deck? Now that's a sweet deal.

0
Posted 27 June 2011 at 11:35

Permalink

I've always thought about doing a clone deck with halimar excavator... might as well give it a try

0
Posted 27 June 2011 at 14:44

Permalink

I love you idea and I came up with my own clone deck and I want to know what you think of the concept of it. Please comment and compare to yours.
http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=200371

0
Posted 28 June 2011 at 05:04

Permalink

...But why are there lightning bolts in a blue deck?

0
Posted 28 June 2011 at 06:34

Permalink

the lightning bolts are flusterstorms

0
Posted 28 June 2011 at 16:49

Permalink

here is the excavator clone deck!

0
Posted 28 June 2011 at 07:54

Permalink

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=201914

0
Posted 28 June 2011 at 07:55

Permalink

I personally love lighthouse chronologist! My question is that if you have x out at once, when an opponent finishes his/her turn, will they alll trigger giving you x amount of turns?

Also as a side note, i'm trying to get into legacy a little and built a reanimator. its called Dead Rising. Would you mind checking it out??

0
Posted 28 June 2011 at 16:51

Permalink

The effect of having multiple Chronologists out is cumulative, you'll get additional extra turns.

And I can take a look, sure. Always happy to see someone try out Legacy =]

0
Posted 28 June 2011 at 19:34

Permalink

thats pretty freakin sweet i must say.

haha thanks! i'm going to be trying legacy exclusively for a bit so check up on my decks if you will! :)

0
Posted 28 June 2011 at 20:43

Permalink

Ok so the new m12 card phantasmal illusion should be in this deck... Just saying

0
Posted 28 June 2011 at 22:24

Permalink

Maybe a liquid metal coating so you can turn things into artifacts for metemorph to copy?

0
Posted 29 June 2011 at 06:32

Permalink

Hey there is a new card Phantasmal image it is pretty much clone except it has the "When this creature becomes the target of a spell or ability, sacrifice it." + its an illusion and it only costs (1) U

0
Posted 29 June 2011 at 07:04

Permalink

Oh man I love illusions. I've had an illusion tribal for years now. Now that they've added new ones AND a friggin' lord! I'm happy =D

0
Posted 29 June 2011 at 07:07

Permalink

So, I made a standard tribal, you should take a look =)

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=205898

0
Posted 08 July 2011 at 03:17

Permalink

well the name definitly suits the deck lmao. wow i really like this deck man nice

0
Posted 29 June 2011 at 23:12

Permalink

what do you think of rite of replication?

0
Posted 30 June 2011 at 02:08

Permalink

I have 4 of them in the deck so...

0
Posted 01 July 2011 at 00:25

Permalink

me and my best friend built a clone deck a couple months ago standard legal its pretty fun made it green blue with some infect thrown in and acidic slime too nothing worse than a clone on a mimic vat lol

0
Posted 03 July 2011 at 10:02

Permalink

Hello Surewhynot,

As always beautiful. I have nothing constructive to say in regards to this deck, however, I noticed you have Gigadrowse in this deck and not your "Id tap that Deck" (which again, is my fav of yours!)....any reason why? Just curious.

Also, I noticed you having a conversation on Stompy decks up above....I appreciated the definition as I have made a black stompy, but was unsure if it really was in fact stompy at all. I was wondering if you would give it your magic touch. Unlike most decks I build, I would actually like to own this deck and not just play with the idea so your input would be very appreciated.
http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=180173

0
Posted 06 July 2011 at 03:54

Permalink

My tap deck is about tapping enemies and keeping them tapped. Gigadrowse is more of a reactionary version of that idea, so I used a different card in its place.

Glad you like this though. =]

0
Posted 06 July 2011 at 04:42

Permalink

have fun vs a creatureless deck...

0
Posted 06 July 2011 at 07:27

Permalink

<_<

yeah....

0
Posted 06 July 2011 at 07:41

Permalink