Ambulabo inter rectam insaniam..

by surewhynot on 25 August 2011

Main Deck (61 cards)

Sideboard (0 cards)

No sideboard found.

The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

"Walk the line between madness and brilliance."

Took my current Iso-Seek frame, and applied it to Snappy =]

Deck Tags

  • Tournament
  • Extraction
  • Iso-Seek

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

20
Likes

This deck has been viewed 21,080 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

1392030

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Not Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Not Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Ambulabo inter rectam insaniam lucente

This is the cheapest deck I've ever seen! Congrats, you are now the Budget King :)

4
Posted 31 August 2011 at 16:38

Permalink

I bet I could make a 1 cent deck.

0
Posted 16 September 2011 at 04:34

Permalink

lol you bastards =]

I've been looking for something that could better my Iso-Seek, but as of yet...this still just serves as a placeholder.

1
Posted 16 September 2011 at 04:44

Permalink

dagbaker has deleted this comment.

Posted 16 September 2011 at 19:45

Permalink

Hmm...Who's third party? (The third like on Savages comment)

0
Posted 17 October 2011 at 03:17

Permalink

Perhaps a bit late, but that third like would have to be me :P

1
Posted 23 October 2011 at 23:06

Permalink

I like the deck name. :) can't wait to see the rest of the deck. :D

1
Posted 20 October 2011 at 21:10

Permalink

LOL, only SWN could post a deck with no cards in it and get people to like it! Talent at its finest. :)

2
Posted 21 October 2011 at 20:36

Permalink

Dude, if we push SWN's deck with no cards in it to the front page, SOOOO many people will get butt hurt over it...

1
Posted 21 October 2011 at 22:13

Permalink

OHH YSH! But if it does, the (real) deck won't be noticed.

0
Posted 22 October 2011 at 06:03

Permalink

Holy crap...I should probably get this thing done finally...

1
Posted 22 October 2011 at 18:34

Permalink

There we go...Now it's actually a deck =P

1
Posted 22 October 2011 at 22:37

Permalink

Now it's 1000% better (which is actually 0...) :P

I like the deck. It's definitely not what I expected, and it's amazing because of that!

I made a Thraximundar EDH a while ago, and thought I'd let you know, since you did make one first. Check it out if you have a moment!

0
Posted 23 October 2011 at 05:57

Permalink

It is still better than most decks :D
Seriously, I've seen some very bad deck in the first page in the last few weeks. I wonder what's happening at the general level of the site.

2
Posted 22 October 2011 at 19:45

Permalink

Iso-Seek, Countertop and 'Snappy' all in one deck, why am I scared?

1
Posted 23 October 2011 at 08:08

Permalink

Ever since my Strong Hold on Discipline hit the front page, I've noticed Forbidden Orchard being used in peoples' decks more often. Is it just coincidence?

1
Posted 23 October 2011 at 08:10

Permalink

I've always liked Forbidden Orchard lol. People think it's cool that they get those little 1/1's, but usually it screws them over =]

1
Posted 23 October 2011 at 08:16

Permalink

Oh yeah! They think they don't have to play creatures (sometimes) so they play other things, and lose!

0
Posted 23 October 2011 at 08:28

Permalink

Orchard fits nicely in certain decks, usually combo. Cascade has been using it more often in Modern, I've noticed. Thought I was going against a net-decked Stronghold until I saw I saw them start cycling cards :P

1
Posted 23 October 2011 at 14:00

Permalink

SWN, I just noticed something amazing in standard! Leonin Arbiter makes Ghost Quarter good! Really freaking good man!

0
Posted 23 October 2011 at 21:49

Permalink

Jorentju_84 has deleted this comment.

Posted 23 October 2011 at 22:50

Permalink

I'm not going to lie, I actually don't care for Snapcaster in Iso-Seek. :/ It's great in some decks, but with NO Bant, I just think it's just kind of unnecessary

1
Posted 23 October 2011 at 23:44

Permalink

I'm not sure about Snappy yet. I've yet to get a chance to try this one out and see how it works =]

0
Posted 24 October 2011 at 01:22

Permalink

Snapcast Tutor to find pieces of the lock, block then extract, snapcast thoughtsieze for disruption - I reckon Snappy will work out. This is classic SWN btw :)

0
Posted 27 October 2011 at 03:44

Permalink

Yeah...after further testing, Snappy is straight up NARSTY =]

0
Posted 27 October 2011 at 04:10

Permalink

i will buy this deck when i got my first million

2
Posted 24 October 2011 at 01:37

Permalink

Just to be one of those douches who comments on the Latin and not the deck, Ambulabo would be "I will walk," Ambula would be the imperative " (you) walk."

0
Posted 24 October 2011 at 04:37

Permalink

I know =]

Latin grammar is goofy with phrases like this...trust me, the 'o' suffix denotes the proper thing.

0
Posted 24 October 2011 at 04:59

Permalink

k i might/ will probly get called a noob for this but... how does this deck win?

0
Posted 24 October 2011 at 05:59

Permalink

Eck! Dude, you're such a noob! He wins by making the opponent forfiet or by removing the opponents threats (and then some) from their library, with Seek.

0
Posted 24 October 2011 at 06:34

Permalink

Without the bitterblossom isn't smokestack more of a hinderence to you then your opponent?

1
Posted 24 October 2011 at 13:20

Permalink

Nah, I have Crucible for lands, and once I get a lock, I care little for my other stuff. Plus, I can choose to stop the Stack any time I feel I need to =]

The true art of playing Legacy is being willing to harm yourself if it means you will win. That's why Legacy players are magic's most dangerous players...we're freakin' lunatics =P

1
Posted 24 October 2011 at 19:58

Permalink

It's over ONE-HUNDRED!!!!!!!!

0
Posted 24 October 2011 at 21:26

Permalink

and here we are once again, looking at the top tier magic players and deck builders for advice. God I'm such a noob :p this will probablly be deleted before anyone even reads it or gets to check it out, but if not, I'm relatively new to magic, (only a couple years under my belt, all casual play) and am looking for advice on my EDH deck, first of its kind :). I'm not sure which of these guys would make a really good commander/general guy, so i ask you, the kings and queens of the vault, would you please help?
http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=251899
thanks again!

0
Posted 25 October 2011 at 01:55

Permalink

I just like that the word "rectam" is in the name. lol.

0
Posted 25 October 2011 at 16:36

Permalink

looking at this deck makes me swell with excitement. I LOVE IT!!! i have seen someone use the tabernacle for a long time. kudos to you

0
Posted 26 October 2011 at 02:51

Permalink

I jumped on the Snapcaster bandwagon, too. What doth life.

DX

0
Posted 27 October 2011 at 04:30

Permalink

I don't know if it's so much a bandwagon as much as it is everyone suddenly realized "holy shit this guy's good!"

1
Posted 27 October 2011 at 05:11

Permalink

I don't think it's exactly possible for this deck to lose. O_o holy shit.

0
Posted 27 October 2011 at 16:42

Permalink

Now I've played a decent share of games on both sides of extraction, and I can safely say, yes it can.
I've actually even managed to skunk extractors out with TES and Reanimator. (http://www.myfacewhen.com/329/)

0
Posted 29 October 2011 at 08:38

Permalink

TES...maybe, it's storm, but it's also damn fast.

Reanimator though? http://www.myfacewhen.com/i/450.jpg

0
Posted 29 October 2011 at 20:36

Permalink

I ran two dark rituals that day to test them out, I crapped a turn one Jin-Gitaxias game one :D Game two I boarded them out for Spell Pierces, and proceed to mop the floor by playing it as an Iona control.

0
Posted 30 October 2011 at 00:35

Permalink

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=253948 This is the list I was testing, it showed some... Interesting results, notably that the red splash is actually pretty boss.

0
Posted 30 October 2011 at 04:45

Permalink