Thatcher Revolt might go well in here.
Permalink
I play on MTGO and there is no option for Pauper EDH to my knowledge was why i was asking. Just if it was doable VS a normal Commander deck.
have you played many matches with this deck at all? does Pauper EDH stand a chance vs another EDH deck or is it just something fun to deck build?
I'd almost suggest pulling them. I made a deck similar a few days ago ill link below. The idea of the enchantments are smart. I just feel that the effect of giving other creatures haste, is a bit unneeded. I play pauper ALOT and I feel that either Trample or Hexproof would be something to look for rather then Haste. Getting to swing on the drop is nice but when the creature is big enough it wont mater. http://www.mtgvault.com/spaghettih34d/decks/defibrillation-pauper/
Im not understanding the Maze Rusher. Is it just for the haste? I feel with only having the 3 defense he is more on the weaker side in this deck, as no other creatures you have are multi coloured.
I think alot of your cards are a bit excessive. The druid/bell ringer combo would be okay if the cost of dropping that combo was a bit more cost effective but I cant see it being what your hoping to get. Flicker is generally best with control cards. I have created a deck myself awhile back that you may want to look at.http://www.mtgvault.com/spaghettih34d/decks/lets-bounce-standpauper/
I threw my own twist on the deck, I hope you dont mind. I gave you credit in the Deck Description section. http://www.mtgvault.com/spaghettih34d/decks/defibrillation-pauper/
http://www.wizards.com/Magic/TCG/Resources.aspx?x=magic/rules/PauperPauper Format
I like the idea. Since your not using the mana to drop the creatures though you may be able to add some big drops of other colours. Just a thought.
Another suggestion for removal might be Grisly Spectacle, and I would bring your Vedalken Entrancer up to 4
I feel it needs more removal/control. Possibly 4 Devour Flesh, since its a mill based win rather then damage based. and maybe 2 of each Essence Scatter/Negate or possibly just 2-3 Cancels.
Personally I wouldn't have the 2 islands. I would add in either a couple Simic Guildgate's or Simic Growth Chambers.
right on well it is looking good :) let me know how it works out for you.
I would say take out Bonds of Faith and switch them with Pacifism. I see you have added Righteous Charge, which is legal in Pauper, but not legal in Standard Pauper as it is currently listed as Uncommon in the current Standard bracket. For this I would suggest using Break of Day, 1/1 to all creatures and with a Faithful Hour to make all creatures indestructible. War Falcon's might be a good add to this deck seeing as majority of your creatures are soldiers.Another reason behind removing Bonds of Faith would be that your tokens are not considered Human. Therefore once enchanted they become passive. And with cloudshift added you wont want to enchant your other human creatures if you intend to bounce them they will lose the enchantment regardless.
alright, then my I suggest pulling out your green, and adding seller of songbirds or knights watch? possibly that beckon apperation? I feel that the green may just become a hindrance with only the 3 (that i feel are fairly unneeded), especially having 10 forest + the tap in guildgates.
Courser's Accord and Horncaller's Chant would be wise with the populate. Put in Arbor' Elf and Farseek to get a bit of ramp. Those with your Avacyn's Pilgrim and you should be laughing with those high cost drops.
love it. well done
I know its a pain :S if your going to use Vulshok Gauntlets why not try adding Accorder's Shield instead, the two combo well together.
Caranial Plating is banned from Pauper format unfortunately :(http://www.wizards.com/Magic/TCG/Resources.aspx?x=magic/rules/Pauper
Bioshift and Primal Huntbeast might be wise adding those in. One of the few creatures with hexproof in Standard Pauper format and you can move counters onto him. There is ALOT of removal in the format so hexproof tends to give a decent advantage.
41-60 of 66 items