Elf Druid

by smrosson on 19 May 2011

Main Deck (60 cards)

Sideboard (0 cards)

No sideboard found.

The owner of this deck hasn't added a sideboard, they probably should...

Submit a list of cards below to bulk import them all into your sideboard. Post one card per line using a format like "4x Birds of Paradise" or "1 Blaze", you can even enter just the card name by itself like "Wrath of God" for single cards.


Deck Description

Very quick Elf Druid land control with overrun capability

Turn 1: Llanowar Elves
Turn 2: Elvish Archdruid or Priest of Titania + Wirewood Lodge
Turn 3: Tap forests to play a 1-2 mana cost elf, then tap Elvish Archdruid for 3 mana and play a 3 mana cost elf, then tap again for 4 mana to play more elves. (possibly 6+ elves by turn 4).
Turn 4: If Ezuri was played, use him to overrun. If Gilt-Leaf was played, you can steal lands (could win by turn 4 easily with multiple overruns)

Deck Tags

  • Creature-Based

Deck at a Glance

Social Stats

2
Likes

This deck has been viewed 1,528 times.

Mana Curve

Mana Symbol Occurrence

000056

Card Legality

  • Not Legal in Standard
  • Not Legal in Modern
  • Legal in Vintage
  • Legal in Legacy

Deck discussion for Elf Druid

would add elvish promenade and beastmasters ascension for 6 forests. and what about priests of titania?

0
Posted 25 May 2011 at 16:25

Permalink

what about mine elves and eldrazi deck? http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=176798

0
Posted 25 May 2011 at 16:28

Permalink

Elvish promenade is not making druids, and this deck is built to have elf druids in order to use gilt-leaf archdruid. Since it is creature-based I did not include beastmaster's ascension although I had it in there originally. Priest of titania is a good option to replace the two arbor elves maybe, but mana is definitely not a problem in this deck.

0
Posted 25 May 2011 at 16:35

Permalink

You have way too many lands. My deck had a similar build and ran only 17 lands. Add two more arbor elves and either some lords or a way to draw. The issue with this build, and this is why I no longer use the archdruid, is that its way too vulnerable, and too slow. Seven druids is a lot to get out unless your opponent just sits there, and the archdruid is a huge target; for me he would never last long enough to be any use, and then I was screwed because he is the only threat in the deck. Sorry to pick this apart, but I'm speaking from experience. Acetecisms also wouldn't be bad because you need to protect your creatures or its game over.

0
Posted 25 May 2011 at 17:09

Permalink