SJag

1 Deck, 26 Comments, 1 Reputation

Since its an infinite loop, its either a Draw per rules, OR (and this is more likely) its a guaranteed loss because its not actually infinite loop in that first condition that causes the loop to exit is you running out of cards to draw.

0
Posted 06 October 2011 at 23:54 as a comment on Draw Damage

Permalink

oh, well if thats the case, nm

0
Posted 06 October 2011 at 03:23 in reply to #204976 on Death Metal

Permalink

Unless im crazy, there are currently zero ways to get myr superion out onto the field.

0
Posted 05 October 2011 at 23:09 as a comment on Death Metal

Permalink

Hey Guys, since everyone in this deck seems to have great ideas, can you take a look at my deck and comment? i could use some expert eyes.

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=238830

0
Posted 29 September 2011 at 18:44 as a comment on The New White-Blue

Permalink

Seems like Snapcaster would pair really well with mimic vat, for a repeatable flashback ability...

0
Posted 29 September 2011 at 15:53 in reply to #203363 on The New White-Blue

Permalink

I realize im gonna get crucified for asking this, but with snapcaster mage, i see it as a really good card, but not stupidly broken card. Can someone please explain to me what makes it better than i see it as?

Since sorcery/instant cards only get flashback till the end of turn, and only get flashback when snapcaster enters the battlefield, this means that all sorcery/instant cards that you'd want to flashback cost 2 CMC (for the snapcaster mage cost) + the CMC of the card you want to flash back. If you dont flashback the card on the snapcaster comes in, you can no longer flashback the card later.

What am i missing here? To Flashback DOJ for example, is a 6 cost.

0
Posted 29 September 2011 at 15:45 as a comment on The New White-Blue

Permalink

Like i stated in a similar type of deck, Stony Silence in the sideboard will conflict with the Swords, as you cant equip them with Stony Silence out.

0
Posted 28 September 2011 at 23:36 as a comment on Invisa-Blade ( the new Caw-Blade??)

Permalink

Given all of the removal/artifact hate that exists in standard, im not sure the 3 swords would be enough to protect it.

0
Posted 28 September 2011 at 23:18 in reply to #203132 on Geistblade

Permalink

How do you plan on protecting your geist out of curiosity? since you have to attack with the geist to get the 4/4 angel.

0
Posted 28 September 2011 at 21:06 in reply to #203094 on Geistblade

Permalink

it seems like this deck could use some flying also, or ways to defend against flying.

0
Posted 28 September 2011 at 17:57 as a comment on Geistblade

Permalink

Stony Silence in the sideboard would conflict with the Swords, so i would remove them. Without the Swords, this deck isnt very strong i dont believe, since you are banking on your ability to equip the sword on the stalker.

0
Posted 28 September 2011 at 17:53 as a comment on Geistblade

Permalink

no Gatekeeper of Malakir?

0
Posted 22 September 2011 at 22:49 as a comment on Sac Attack!

Permalink

Why no tumble magnets?

0
Posted 22 September 2011 at 20:40 as a comment on U/W Tap Deck- Need Suggestions

Permalink

Probably a good replacement for Jace's Erasure, which doesnt by you alot in this deck.

0
Posted 22 September 2011 at 16:43 in reply to #202028 on Illusion

Permalink

Wurmcoil engines are always good in this deck, can be cloned by the images, can be brought in quickly by the architect, etc etc

0
Posted 22 September 2011 at 16:42 as a comment on Illusion

Permalink

Aren't all decks, "make your opponent lose the game" decks? :P

1
Posted 22 September 2011 at 16:41 as a comment on Lose, darn you!

Permalink

Why not add 4x Glimmerpost to speed up the Cloudposts?

0
Posted 19 September 2011 at 19:00 as a comment on Fast-As-Hell Eldrazi?

Permalink

Also, Mind Funeral would pair well with Mana Severance to mill yourself in two cards.

0
Posted 09 September 2011 at 16:05 as a comment on Mill yourself

Permalink

right, my bad, not RIGHT then, but the next time you had to draw (next draw step or when you played Trade Secrets, or Jace Archivist's Ability)

0
Posted 09 September 2011 at 15:46 in reply to #198972 on Mill yourself

Permalink

I assume that If you had Laboratory Maniac out already and then played Demonic Consultation and named say Mana Leak (not in your deck), you'd win right then.

0
Posted 09 September 2011 at 01:53 in reply to #198972 on Mill yourself

Permalink

1-20 of 26 items

1 2 Last