reaverOfCheesecake

19 Decks, 29 Comments, 6 Reputation

I like the sideboard of "-4 x forest" and "-4 x Mountain". That would make your deck only 56 cards if you were to shuffle them in :-D

2
Posted 01 March 2013 at 14:29 as a comment on Werewolves

Permalink

Ah, another loop deck. I really wish i could get some 'demonic tutors' into mine but they are way too expensive to buy lol.

'Crucible worlds' and 'Armageddon'... nice move.

Please take a look at this one and pass over some wisdom :-)

http://www.mtgvault.com/reaverofcheesecake/decks/infinity-deck/

0
Posted 31 January 2013 at 14:35 as a comment on Ultimate Infinity

Permalink

just out of curiosity, why not use 'fetters' instead of pacifism. I do like the defensive line which you can make using 'High Preist of Penance'

Please check out my loop deck and tell me what you think. there might draw some combo ideas from it ;-)

http://www.mtgvault.com/reaverofcheesecake/decks/infinity-deck/

*
Sorry, ignore 'fetters' remark. didn't realize this was a standard deck. Me feels like a fool :P

0
Posted 31 January 2013 at 14:28 as a comment on Infinite Extort

Permalink

nice concept. If you don't mind, please take a look at this one for a few other ideas :)

http://www.mtgvault.com/reaverofcheesecake/decks/infinity-deck/

0
Posted 30 January 2013 at 14:45 as a comment on Infinte Damage (standard)

Permalink

Me likes the populate and splice combination. I would recommend sidebording 'sundering growth' as the populate may only work if an enchantment or artifact is destroyed, which you cannot always guarantee will exist. Why not put 'vitu-ghazi guildmage' in as a replacement unless your playing against heavy enchant/artifact focused decks ;). Good job.

0
Posted 25 January 2013 at 01:19 as a comment on Splicer golem

Permalink

Nice deck.

I personally have ignored trample as i have found that populate generally allows enough creatures to be spawned to go around blockers... not to say that trample isn't a good idea as that's obviously your spin to aid the populate mechanic. I would sideboard "Sundering Growth" if I were you as you cannot populate unless an artifact is destroyed, which you cannot guarantee will exist. You could use "druids deliverance" when artifact destruction isn't essential ;)

0
Posted 23 January 2013 at 00:07 as a comment on Populate Selesnya

Permalink

Exchanged murder for "Kalitas, Bloodchief of Ghet". This effectively allows multiple murders while boosting the defensive line. Usually able to get this card out by turn 5 :) "Necrotic Ooze" can use the ability from the graveyard so the fact that it is likely to be sniped isn't too much of a problem.

0
Posted 20 November 2012 at 20:40 in reply to #300984 on Infinity Deck

Permalink

I share your love for Myr's my chum ... ((points at random snickering person) - don't be so immature!). I decided to go all out on a look deck myself and ended up making something pretty damn evil :P.

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=386065

0
Posted 12 November 2012 at 19:46 as a comment on Myr Deck Wins

Permalink

Murder was added back in... "Rain of Thorns" can still be used to terminate enchantments and artifacts. Murder is better used as an instant anyway i have found due to that fact that everyone plays aggressively against this deck.

0
Posted 06 November 2012 at 14:53 in reply to #300984 on Infinity Deck

Permalink

removed "Exquisite Blood" lol

0
Posted 05 November 2012 at 14:47 in reply to #300984 on Infinity Deck

Permalink

I recently turned this into a 70 card deck and removed the sideboard as it wasn't getting used (although "Temporal Extortion" can still be thrown in when needed). The reason for this is because I found that i was getting starved for swamp cards on the first hand more often than i would like. Also, "murder" only works on creatures which i found to be slightly irritating when the need arose to remove a key enchantment or artifact. "Rain of Thorns" was added to allow the "Oblivion Ring" to cycle and aid in controlling the game flow.

I am still debating whether keep "Exquisite Blood" but it really shouldn't be needed. I will test how the deck plays over the next few weeks but i suspect that it will get traded out for another land card.

0
Posted 01 November 2012 at 14:37 as a comment on Infinity Deck

Permalink

Thanks for the info. I am trying to keep the majority of the deck black but have made use of white and green on a very small scale. I cannot use blue I'm afraid but your info will help others so please don't feel that your advise is wasted. The second combo is an interesting synergy though.

1
Posted 30 October 2012 at 20:33 in reply to #299443 on Infinity Deck

Permalink

Cheers for the comments so far. I have edited the description to demonstrate how best to protect against flying creatures.

0
Posted 29 October 2012 at 19:02 as a comment on Infinity Deck

Permalink

agreed... unless i'm missing something in which case i am happy to be corrected

0
Posted 29 October 2012 at 14:49 in reply to #300138 on Vamp, Can't be stopped

Permalink

Edited in order to add 1 x "Rest for the Weary"; 1 x "Oblivion Ring" and 3 x "plains". The deck was running slightly starved in some cases so i decided to make it a 65 card deck :)

0
Posted 18 October 2012 at 13:48 as a comment on Long Live The Kitsune

Permalink

Damage prevention themed deck. Gotta love those fox clerics.

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=386230

Comments welcome

0
Posted 08 October 2012 at 13:32 as a comment on Post Decks Here!!!!

Permalink

I have just realized that "diabolic revelation" exists... This could replace "Increasing Ambition" and allow the deck to remove "Pull from Eternity". I believe that "Upwelling" and "Exquisite Blood" can then be put in their place.

It will remove the ability to remove a card from exile however which is a nice ability for a combo deck.

0
Posted 03 October 2012 at 13:55 as a comment on Infinity Deck

Permalink

Ah, I get it now... The more you know eh :-)

0
Posted 30 September 2012 at 02:01 in reply to #292297 on All your base are belong to us

Permalink

Not quite sure how a control deck is supposed to work but you get my vote just for the deck name ^.^

0
Posted 26 September 2012 at 23:11 as a comment on All your base are belong to us

Permalink

Hey all

Just a general opinion would be good

http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=386065
http://www.mtgvault.com/ViewDeck.aspx?DeckID=386230

Cheers

0
Posted 26 September 2012 at 23:08 as a comment on Post Decks Here!!!!

Permalink

1-20 of 24 items

1 2 Last